Forget Peterson and Ramsey

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

I've seen plenty of legit insider info from people without a "blue check mark". That might be one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

Yeah cause that person had 100 followers yup they have real info lol

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by Showtime

Yeah cause that person had 100 followers yup they have real info lol

Quit acting like you’re some twitter guru just because you know how to copy and paste.

[notorious]

Of course, 2 Chiefs 1sts is damn near 2 2nds....

[TimBone]

Originally Posted by notorious

Of course, 2 Chiefs 1sts is damn near 2 2nds....

Doesn't matter. You cant keep trading away first round picks. At some point, you rely on those picks and their low salaries to be the base of your team.

For every first round pick you trade, you're basically going out into free agency (or whoever you traded the pick for) to replace the player you would have taken with that pick. The cost of the player in the trade/free agency is going to cost much more than the draft pick would have.

Basically, if you keep trading away picks for expensive veterans, its gonna put you in cap hell.

[Dante84]

Chadiha is friends with Veach if I remember correctly. Both him and Riddick are tied in.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Dante84

Chadiha is friends with Veach if I remember correctly. Both him and Riddick are tied in.

Chadiha generally likes the Chiefs. He's one of the better ones on espn. Terez is carefully about saying things. If he says we're in or out as opposed to saying he knows nothing, I'd trust it.

I'm OK with the draft haul we gave up for frank Clark. But I'm generally not a fan of giving up first rounders let alone for a rental.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Chadiha generally likes the Chiefs. He's one of the better ones on espn. Terez is carefully about saying things. If he says we're in or out as opposed to saying he knows nothing, I'd trust it.

I'm OK with the draft haul we gave up for frank Clark. But I'm generally not a fan of giving up first rounders let alone for a rental.

Personally, I think the smartest thing they could do is make the deal. Sign Ramsey long term, tag and trade Jones to recoup value.

I can replace a DT much easier than finding an elite level CB.

[Chris Meck]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Personally, I think the smartest thing they could do is make the deal. Sign Ramsey long term, tag and trade Jones to recoup value.

I can replace a DT much easier than finding an elite level CB.

I could not disagree more.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Personally, I think the smartest thing they could do is make the deal. Sign Ramsey long term, tag and trade Jones to recoup value.

I can replace a DT much easier than finding an elite level CB.

You keep saying this, I don't think it's the case.

You can find an elite DT without a first round pick? Pretty tough, especially a team that hasn't shown it's really able to ID DL in the draft.

[Jerm]

Originally Posted by O.city

You keep saying this, I don't think it's the case.

You can find an elite DT without a first round pick? Pretty tough, especially a team that hasn't shown it's really able to ID DL in the draft.

Chris Jones went in the 2nd lol....

[Mecca]

Meanwhile Howard in Miami responded to the Fitzpatrick trade like this...

pic.twitter.com/wLbhtqqNv5

— Xavien Howard (@Iamxavienhoward) September 17, 2019

[Dunerdr]

I’m not really buying any of the rumors right now one minute we’re in then we’re out. We have an obvious need an obvious “soft window” with Mahomes on a rookie deal.

[O.city]

As much as I like Ramsey, it just doesn't make sense.

You're talking 2 first rounders and a massive deal. Probably wise to let someone else do that if you're plan is to keep Chris Jones.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by O.city

As much as I like Ramsey, it just doesn't make sense.

You're talking 2 first rounders and a massive deal. Probably wise to let someone else do that if you're plan is to keep Chris Jones.

I could make the argument finding a top of the line CB is much harder than finding DL in todays game.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Mecca

I could make the argument finding a top of the line CB is much harder than finding DL in todays game.

Then I'd counter that top of the line Cb isn't as necessary because of the rules of the league and you can't really be that aggressive back there anymore.

So having a DL that can be dominant against the pass always takes precedence