|
|
View Poll Results: Patrick Mahomes II starting every game in 2017 would have been... | |||
Better for the Chiefs in both the short term and the long term. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
66 | 46.15% |
Better for the Chiefs in the short term, but worse in the long term. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 5.59% |
Worse for the Chiefs in the short term, but better in the long term. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 18.88% |
Worse for the Chiefs in both the short term and the long term. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 13.29% |
I'm incapable of thinking clearly due to my excitement about the game tomorrow. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 12.59% |
Sorry, but I don't read English. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.50% |
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $1544497
|
Not only that, but a playoff loss of his own could hit his confidence. Media and fans only memory of Mahomes would be a playoff game he was unprepared for. That's a long offseason. And not ideal considering that many fans and in the media weren't sold on getting rid of Smith. Unnecessary to rush him. We gave Mahomes his own offense built around him and a full offseason to prepare. Frankly, judging by the way the Chiefs approached the offseason, I think they expected him to have a bumpy first few games.
|
Posts: 48,667
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|