Herm Edwards will interview for Arizona State HC job

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Buehler445

****ing horseshit. He was and still is, if you’ve listened to a word he has said on ESPN, absolutely ****ing clueless on how you score points against a defense. Accordingly, he can’t know anything about scheming because he is openly clueless about offense.

Solaris was his ****ing guy and he hated Gaileys Palko stuff.

Solari wasn't his guy. He was Carl Petersons.

There was talk that if he stayed one more year he would have kept going with Gaileys pistol and spread. No indication whatsoever that he hated the offense. Except because you don't like him. And I don't know what Gailey has to do with Palko. Gailey ran a college offense with the Chiefs.

[Buehler445]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Solari wasn't his guy. He was Carl Petersons.

There was talk that if he stayed one more year he would have kept going with Gaileys pistol and spread. No indication whatsoever that he hated the offense. Except because you don't like him. And I don't know what Gailey has to do with Palko. Gailey ran a college offense with the Chiefs.

I didn’t say shit about Palko. Where is that coming from?

Maybe Solari wasn’t his guy but he wanted what Solari put out.

I know he hated what Gailey was doing because he would go to a press conference and talk about running the ball, controlling the clock, and playing tough power football and then a day later Gailey is out there throwing passes to the QB split out wide.

You really think that if Saunders’ system (with a ****load of power run game) is a “circus offense” that he loathed so much that a shitload of gadget plays and QB scrambles isn’t?

Come on man. I get it that you’re the last guy on the planet that doesn’t think Squirmin Herman Mother****ing Sack of **** Edwards is pure fraud doesn’t mean he was the least bit progressive offensively. He never said anything in any conference ever about attacking weaknesses or creating matchups. He’s too stupid to understand it. It’s reinforced by his “analysis” on ESPN. It’s always “if you’ve got a guy that can throw 40 times and not turn it over you’re going to be hard to beat”. He gives no indication as to why teams can throw it 40 times without turning it over and others can’t. He’s just too stupid to understand scheme.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Buehler445

I didn’t say shit about Palko. Where is that coming from?

Maybe Solari wasn’t his guy but he wanted what Solari put out.

I know he hated what Gailey was doing because he would go to a press conference and talk about running the ball, controlling the clock, and playing tough power football and then a day later Gailey is out there throwing passes to the QB split out wide.

You really think that if Saunders’ system (with a ****load of power run game) is a “circus offense” that he loathed so much that a shitload of gadget plays and QB scrambles isn’t?

Come on man. I get it that you’re the last guy on the planet that doesn’t think Squirmin Herman Mother****ing Sack of **** Edwards is pure fraud doesn’t mean he was the least bit progressive offensively. He never said anything in any conference ever about attacking weaknesses or creating matchups. He’s too stupid to understand it. It’s reinforced by his “analysis” on ESPN. It’s always “if you’ve got a guy that can throw 40 times and not turn it over you’re going to be hard to beat”. He gives no indication as to why teams can throw it 40 times without turning it over and others can’t. He’s just too stupid to understand scheme.

Show me a quote where herm rejected Gaileys pistol offense toward the end of the season. He started the season embracing his typical r2p2 but he seemed extremely supportive of the offense once Gailey started running it. Youre making this shit up that he at all resisted what Gailey was doing.

[Buehler445]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Show me a quote where herm rejected Gaileys pistol offense toward the end of the season. He started the season embracing his typical r2p2 but he seemed extremely supportive of the offense once Gailey started running it. Youre making this shit up that he at all resisted what Gailey was doing.

You couldn’t pay me enough to go back through Squirmin Herman Mother****ing Sack of **** Edwards’ press conferences.

But good luck pushing the narrative that Squirmin Herman Mother****ing Sack of **** Edwards was embracing and encouraging to a progressive offense. If you’re going to forget about all the nonsense he spewed here and after he went to ESPN be my guest. But good luck, man. Enjoy the fight. It will be you against the world.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Buehler445

You couldn’t pay me enough to go back through Squirmin Herman Mother****ing Sack of **** Edwards’ press conferences.

But good luck pushing the narrative that Squirmin Herman Mother****ing Sack of **** Edwards was embracing and encouraging to a progressive offense. If you’re going to forget about all the nonsense he spewed here and after he went to ESPN be my guest. But good luck, man. Enjoy the fight. It will be you against the world.

I am asking you to show one ounce of proof. One. Everything after his last season pointed to Gailey keeping his job, and even consideration of Tyler Thigpen keeping his job despite his limitations. And a serious evaluation of the offense that sounded very embracing of continuing some version of the pistol.

You are making this shit up. You're the one who made the comment that he rejected this offense. Prove it. With something that he said, not something someone on cp speculated.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I am asking you to show one ounce of proof. One. Everything after his last season pointed to Gailey keeping his job, and even consideration of Tyler Thigpen keeping his job despite his limitations. And a serious evaluation of the offense that sounded very embracing of continuing some version of the pistol.

You are making this shit up. You're the one who made the comment that he rejected this offense. Prove it. With something that he said, not something someone on cp speculated.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/9...at-quarterback
Since you won't find the simple ask of one shred of proof, I found it for you. Sounds like he wanted to keep a variation of the spread but wasn't convinced Thigpen was the best qb to do it but sounds like he was considering a plan B to run spread concepts with a different qb.

[Buehler445]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/9...at-quarterback
Since you won't find the simple ask of one shred of proof, I found it for you. Sounds like he wanted to keep a variation of the spread but wasn't convinced Thigpen was the best qb to do it but sounds like he was considering a plan B to run spread concepts with a different qb.

I told you I’m not reading that hogshit. I can’t stand that man. I’m not going to look up examples for you where you will just make up some damned other excuse for your hero. Just like you did with your dumbass 3 years in the league with Vermiels roster. **** that shit. If you’re too goddamned simple minded to remember him taking about ball control before games I don’t know what to tell you man.

Herm was and remains a fraud. Just because you can’t see how your hero was completely clueless regarding the offense I won’t help you. I already tried with your ridiculous just what the franchise needed ridiculousness.