15K penis's examined. How do you measure up?

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

This "study" is damn near quackery:

The study participants were men aged 17 to 91 who had their penises measured in 20 previously published studies conducted in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the United States.

The team found no evidence for penis size differences linked to race, though most of the study participants were of European and Middle Eastern descent and a full comparison could thus not be made.


http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/2388...-average-size/


----


So basically, this isn't a "new" study, nor is it comprehensive. If the scientists didn't actually create this study from the ground up, didn't measure in South America, Australia and didn't specify which countries in Asia, their conclusions are likely to be extremely skewed and inaccurate.

This is being published in a old school scientific medical journal.

Official journal of the British Association of Urological Surgeons, the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Hong Kong Urological Association, the Caribbean Urological Association and the Irish Society of Urology, and affiliated journal of the Urological Society of India

Doesn't look like a bunch of quacks to me.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

This is being published in a old school scientific medical journal.

Official journal of the British Association of Urological Surgeons, the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Hong Kong Urological Association, the Caribbean Urological Association and the Irish Society of Urology, and affiliated journal of the Urological Society of India

Doesn't look like a bunch of quacks to me.

It's incomplete. If they're outright admitting that most of the men were European and Middle Eastern, it's not representative of all men everywhere and should not be used as any type of standard.

It's not a true average when the majority is from two races.