As a ref, how can you possibly make that call??

[TripleThreat]

Besides all the bullshit, How, as a ref, can you make that call in a playoff game. Team is trailing by 2, going for a 2pnt conversion, and you call a holding call, something both teams have been doing all game.. if youve been calling them all game, sure call it, but you werent, and havent been. How could you not see the hold did not affect the outcome of the play? By the time the "hold" even occured which was more of harrison just deciding to flail to the ground like a little bitch, the ball was WELL out of smiths hands and going to the endzone at the point of this "hold"... So again, as a ref, how can you not look at the hold, then look at Smith and see the hold wouldve not affected the outcome of the play? Its BULL SHIT to make that call in a situation like that... And btw, this is the same crew working the superbowl.

[FlintHillsChiefs]

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

That's exactly what we're saying. While it might have been a hold, so too was the hold on Ford, and the DPI on Kelce, yet only one was called. It's NOT Fisher's hold, it's Fisher's hold when the others weren't called.

It's the NFL, selective application of the rules.

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk (so spelling be damned!!!)

Okay, so you're so busy rubbing your ass all over sand paper with diamonds in it over a clear hold, because you believe it's a clear hold. Gotcha. Do you what you have to do.

[rocknrolla]

If you all think this game came down to one holding call, your are ****ing delusional! Really, it has nothing with our pathetic hands of stone offence?

[GloryDayz]

Originally Posted by FlintHillsChiefs

Okay, so you're so busy rubbing your ass all over sand paper with diamonds in it over a clear hold, because you believe it's a clear hold. Gotcha. Do you what you have to do.

I'm chapped because it was called, but others weren't. I'd like the officials to explain their logic . Minimally the question should be asked. Is that too hard for you to comprehend? Is the concept of "call it both ways" above you?

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk (so spelling be damned!!!)

[FlintHillsChiefs]

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

I'm chapped because it was called, but others weren't. I'd like the officials to explain their logic . Minimally the question should be asked. Is that too hard for you to comprehend? Is the concept of "call it both ways" above you?

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk (so spelling be damned!!!)

No I'm okay with that. However I'm hearing too much of " THAT WASNT A HOLD **** YOU REFS". So fine. You want to claim holds weren't called evenly both ways I can get behind that with evidence. However, I will not support the idea that it wasn't a hold and the refs pulled it out of their asses.

[JD10367]

Not only was it a hold, it was a) a blatant hold and b) it had a direct impact on that score, because without the hold he gets to Smith and there's no 2PC.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by JD10367

Not only was it a hold, it was a) a blatant hold and b) it had a direct impact on that score, because without the hold he gets to Smith and there's no 2PC.

No he wouldn't have you inbred piece of shit

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by Spider2YBanana

You can't have it both ways, bub.

The refs made a correct call to put the Chiefs in position to score. Steelers fans probably whined about it.

They then made another correct call to take away a 2 point conversion. Chiefs fans whined about it.

That didn't decide the game. The Chiefs could have still done lots of things to win it, including:

1. Converting on the next play.
2. Stopping the Steelers.
3. Playing some football between the first drive and the last one.
4. Not taking half the ****ing quarter to score a TD, thereby leaving them more time to get the ball back.

The Chiefs lost to what is probably the best or second best team in the NFL.

There's no shame in that. Blaming it on the refs is a loser's mentality.

You suck monkey nuts, Clay

[kcpasco]

Originally Posted by JD10367

Not only was it a hold, it was a) a blatant hold and b) it had a direct impact on that score, because without the hold he gets to Smith and there's no 2PC.

C) wouldn't have been flagged on NE.

[ARROW2]

As football fans, we got robbed of a likely thrilling OT playoff game when the ****ing refs decide to call the first ****ing holding call of the night on either team at THAT moment. Good job nfl, way to let em play until the end and let the players decide. What ever happened to that shit in sports? **** you NFL, aka, WWE!

[Pasta Little Brioni]

The standard was set all night that that wasn't going to be called a penalty. It was selective enforcement and a HUGE reason many are done with this piece of shit sport.

[kcpasco]

Not a single offensive holding call until late in the 4th quarter on a game tying 2 point conversion. LOL

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Selective enforcement. Picking and choosing WHEN to **** a team playing NE PITT or GB

[Red Dawg]

Ref had orders and he followed them. No holding until the game tieing 2 pointer? Does that make any sense unless on purpose?

That flag is not thrown if we were an NFL money maker.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

"Let em play" (until Pitt is on the ropes)

[Easy 6]

Had the refs made even ONE holding call on Pitt, this wouldnt piss me off nearly as bad

They were watching us like hawks for it, didnt give a damn what Pitt did