MU ****The official NEW new conference realignment thread.**** - Page 304

**Saul Good** · 01-31-2012, 02:52 PM

the second thread has been pronounced dead.

mnchiefsguy · 07-31-2012, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

You're right. The game was so successful they're changing the entire postseason system.

So the Alabama/LSU game was the reason the postseason system was changed?

What a stunning revelation.

Frazod · 07-31-2012, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

You're right. The game was so successful they're changing the entire postseason system.

Please. The BCS has been broken for YEARS. At least these two teams actually BEAT SOMEBODY GOOD to earn their spots.

As we are all aware, that has often not been the case.

Bambi · 07-31-2012, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

So the Alabama/LSU game was the reason the postseason system was changed?

What a stunning revelation.

The SEC brand of football is hard to watch for most of the country. You're never going to see that atrocity again.

mnchiefsguy · 07-31-2012, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

The KU brand of football is hard to watch for everyone. You'll always get that quality of football from KU.

Fixed your post.

Bambi · 07-31-2012, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

Please. The BCS has been broken for YEARS. At least these two teams actually BEAT SOMEBODY GOOD to earn their spots.

As we are all aware, that has often not been the case.

I think the sooner people realize that CFB will never be the NFL we can all move on much easier. You guys just need a damn BCS bowl so you can get over it already.

I'd say off the top of my head the BCS has done a pretty good job pitting the best two teams in the NC over the last few years. But in the history of CFB the National Championship really isn't all that important. Just look at how many different teams have claimed it over the years.

Last year was a fluke. Oklahoma State probably would have run either of them off the field. But OSU isn't in the club so you were never going to find out.

Bambi · 07-31-2012, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Fixed your post.

ok, that's pretty good

mnchiefsguy · 07-31-2012, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

I think the sooner people realize that CFB will never be the NFL we can all move on much easier. You guys just need a damn BCS bowl so you can get over it already.

I'd say off the top of my head the BCS has done a pretty good job pitting the best two teams in the NC over the last few years. But in the history of CFB the National Championship really isn't all that important. Just look at how many different teams have claimed it over the years.

Last year was a fluke. Oklahoma State probably would have run either of them off the field. But OSU isn't in the club so you were never going to find out.

Except for the years that the BCS gave us a shitty matchup....like when Nebraska lost by three touchdowns. For every good BCS NC matchup, there is an awful one it seems.

Frazod · 07-31-2012, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

I think the sooner people realize that CFB will never be the NFL we can all move on much easier. You guys just need a damn BCS bowl so you can get over it already.

I'd say off the top of my head the BCS has done a pretty good job pitting the best two teams in the NC over the last few years. But in the history of CFB the National Championship really isn't all that important. Just look at how many different teams have claimed it over the years.

Last year was a fluke. Oklahoma State probably would have run either of them off the field. But OSU isn't in the club so you were never going to find out.

There's so much fail in this post, I don't even know where to start.

Dr. Gigglepants · 07-31-2012, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

The SEC brand of football is hard to watch for most of the country. You're never going to see that atrocity again.

Unless the 4 team playoff isn't limited to only conference champs like Mike Slive is advocating. I guess we'll see how much pull the SEC has when those details are hammered out.

Bambi · 07-31-2012, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Except for the years that the BCS gave us a shitty matchup....like when Nebraska lost by three touchdowns. For every good BCS NC matchup, there is an awful one it seems.

The sport is inherently unfair. Teams don't play balanced schedules, there's no "player draft" of any kind, players are bought left and right, all the teams have different level of resources and spending...

You have to take CFB for what it is. Fun on Saturday afternoons with beer and sun. You can't look at it like real competition. If you do you'll be caught up in a constant hamster wheel of trying to figure out a system that is "fair".

Personally I think with this whole 4 team playoff thing that is getting introduced things just got that much more complicated and that many more teams at the end are going to be left angry. But if they get all bent out of shape about it it's their own fault. It's not worth getting all upset about.

Bambi · 07-31-2012, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

There's so much fail in this post, I don't even know where to start.

I heard Gary Pinkle ranked Oklahoma State like 6th or something in his final poll.

What a butthurt tool your coach is.

Bambi · 07-31-2012, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants

Unless the 4 team playoff isn't limited to only conference champs like Mike Slive is advocating. I guess we'll see how much pull the SEC has when those details are hammered out.

Mike Slive is not the only one advocating that setup.

Good try though..

Frazod · 07-31-2012, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

I heard Gary Pinkle ranked Oklahoma State like 6th or something in his final poll.

What a butthurt tool your coach is.

Sorry, I'm still trying to wrap my mind around your "National Championship really isn't all that important" bit.

I can only process so much utter, abject ****ing stupidity at once.

Bambi · 07-31-2012, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

Sorry, I'm still trying to wrap my mind around your "National Championship really isn't all that important" bit.

I can only process so much utter, abject ****ing stupidity at once.

Who won the National Championship in 1973?

Frazod · 07-31-2012, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson

Who won the National Championship in 1973?

That's your ****ing argument? Really?

I'm sorry, I was 8 in 1973. I don't remember who won anything in 1973. I could be like you and look it up and then lie and claim I remembered, but what's the point?

Sometimes you're so ****ing lame I border on pitying you.

It never lasts, though.

01-31-2012, 02:52 PM
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	**The official NEW new conference realignment thread.** the second thread has been pronounced dead.
Posts: 41,870