Chiefs Preaseason Unit Discussions: Offensive Line - Page 3

**Rain Man** · 08-21-2015, 06:17 PM

Per the discussions earlier this week, I wanted to offer an experimental concept. During the preseason, let's discuss each of the units on the Chiefs in a particular thread.

Post your thoughts during the games or between games about individual performances.

This thread is for offensive linemen. How they doin'?

**DaneMcCloud** · 08-21-2015, 10:01 PM

Mathis can **** off

Sweet Daddy Hate · 08-21-2015, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Draft Gabe Jackson last season, draft John Miller this past off-season, draft La'el Collins.

That's what I would have done.

**** YOUR NEVER-ENDING FATTY CLOWN DRAFT, THIS IS THE REAL WORLD.

TEX · 08-21-2015, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

What the **** was Dorsey supposed to do? Tell me, please.

Yes, I wanted another tackle to be brought in, but outside of going full reerun with free agency and the draft, what the **** was Dorsey supposed to ****ing do?

MOST TEAMS deal with question marks on the offensive line EVERY ****ING SEASON.

The Chargers and Broncos, the two teams you could say will challenge us legitimately this year in the division, have just as many holes as we do on THEIR offensive lines.

You and many others are being downright ridiculous, as if anything but the 2003 Chiefs offensive line is a disaster all because you don't know how it will play.

I actually know the answer to that question. You ready for it? Here it goes.

THE 2015 CHIEFS OFFENSIVE LINE WILL BE INCONSISTENT. THEY WILL LOOK GOOD SOME GAMES AND BAD SOME OTHERS. THEY WILL HAVE PLAYS WHERE THEY DO AN OUTSTANDING JOB AND THEY WILL HAVE PLAYS WHERE THEY HAVE NO ****ING CLUE WHAT THEY'RE DOING TO THE HINDRANCE OF THE OFFENSIVE LINE.

Guess what I just described. Every single ****ing offensive line that has ever been in existence, including some of the great ones.

Calm the **** down.

Im very calm. I know what I saw this week and last. If u think what the Chiefs have now will ever become a solid OL, you're about as wrong as anyone's ever been in the history of the world. That's a lot of wrong.

**RealSNR** · 08-21-2015, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Mathis can **** off

I can't wait for Mathis to sign with a team and end up playing like crap because he's 34 ****ing years old.

wasi · 08-21-2015, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kc79

It's not hard to judge LDT. He's not ready

LDT missed big on one play, that sticks out because it was a sack. It wasn't perfect but he was better than Fanaika or Morse.

**RealSNR** · 08-21-2015, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX

Im very calm. I know what I saw this week and last. If u think what the Chiefs have now will ever become a solid OL, you're about as wrong as anyone's ever been in the history of the world. That's a lot of wrong.

Define solid.

I think when the Chiefs have both of their starting OTs (healthy), this is an adequate offensive line.

Some people might call that solid, while others define solid as being good. Like, top 10 good.

I don't care about having a top 10 offensive line. Never have. If we end up developing one, then ****ing great. If not, then they just need to avoid being 2014 bad.

We're right on track to do exactly that.

KChiefs1 · 08-21-2015, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

All bright tweeted that he heard a lot about Mathis to KC

That's what Tweeter is saying.

TEX · 08-21-2015, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wasi

LDT missed big on one play, that sticks out because it was a sack. It wasn't perfect but he was better than Fanaika or Morse.

That's not saying much. They were all pathetic.

jonzie04 · 08-21-2015, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Paul Fanaika is going away REGARDLESS of who they do or do not bring in. He's irrelevant to the future of the team.

Wanna know why the line looked like a shit show? Because Reid wanted to test LDT (a test that LDT failed), Morse isn't ready (and I think we'll see that change happen in Week 3) and PAUL ****ING FANAIKA WAS OUR STARTING RT.

Christ almighty. You and a bunch of other reerunifs aren't seeing the forest for the ****ing trees.

Umm hello, are you not reading what you're typing or what? The coaching staff clearly isn't happy with Fulton, and we've seen first hand that Tardif and Morse aren't ready. There are nearly no cons to us bringing in Mathis at this point. Good teams bring in older vets as stop gaps all the time. It's no different than Green Bay bringing in Peppers, or New England bringing in Randy Moss when they did. Or the Seahawks trying the bring in Mathis right ****ing now. We gave our young guns a chance to show that they're ready, and they've shown us that they aren't ready. It's time to bring in another guy to let these guys develop.

You are a ****ing clown. A typical CP, band wagoning, Anti fatty. Newsflash, our interior line was so bad last year that we had to completely eliminate 7 step drops, and even still, we gave up more sacks than nearly any team in the league.... and things are looking just as bad.

O.city · 08-21-2015, 10:21 PM

They don't seem to be happy or settled at rg with anyone.

TEX · 08-21-2015, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Define solid.

I think when the Chiefs have both of their starting OTs (healthy), this is an adequate offensive line.

Some people might call that solid, while others define solid as being good. Like, top 10 good.

I don't care about having a top 10 offensive line. Never have. If we end up developing one, then ****ing great. If not, then they just need to avoid being 2014 bad.

We're right on track to do exactly that.

When u have to ask someone to define what should be obvious, then you're way backwards on said topic. You're reaching to try and salvage your point of view. The players on this OL are showing us who and what they are, just like they did last year at this time. I suggest you believe them ...

jonzie04 · 08-21-2015, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

I can't wait for Mathis to sign with a team and end up playing like crap because he's 34 ****ing years old.

You anti fatty Mathis guys feel the need to keep repeating his age.... How old was Moss when he and Brady set the league on fire?

Mathis is 1 year older than DJ and Devito, both of whom are coming off Achilles tears, and both of whom have looked amazing this preseason.

Mathis was THE BEST guard in the NFL in 2013 and his injuries last year aren't nearly as serious as DJ and Devitos.

**RealSNR** · 08-21-2015, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonzie04

Umm hello, are you not reading what you're typing or what? The coaching staff clearly isn't happy with Fulton, and we've seen first hand that Tardif and Morse aren't ready. There are nearly no cons to us bringing in Mathis at this point. Good teams bring in older vets as stop gaps all the time. It's no different than Green Bay bringing in Peppers, or New England bringing in Randy Moss when they did. Or the Seahawks trying the bring in Mathis right ****ing now. We gave our young guns a chance to show that they're ready, and they've shown us that they aren't ready. It's time to bring in another guy to let these guys develop.

You are a ****ing clown. A typical CP, band wagoning, Anti fatty. Newsflash, our interior line was so bad last year that we had to completely eliminate 7 step drops, and even still, we gave up more sacks than nearly any team in the league.... and things are looking just as bad.

I remember when the coaching staff wasn't happy with Stephenson. It must have been because he sucked! Otherwise why wouldn't he be starting the preseason game!

You're taking Reid's roster moves in preseason and acting like they hold a vein of truth to them. You should know better than that after 3 years of him as head coach of this team.

I'm also not opposed to Mathis like you're painting me out to be. I'm just saying that people are getting REAAAALLLY carried away by looking at the players Reid threw out there tonight and saying, "THAT'S IT WE'RE DOOOMED THIS OFFENSIVE LINE WILL LET IN THE MONGOLS TO RAPE OUR WIVES AND CHILDREN"

Again, I have a feeling this fanbase (TEX included) simply doesn't have a clue what the NFL is like these days. They don't know what an average team offensive line looks like or what struggles nearly all teams have at the position core every single freakin year.

O.city · 08-21-2015, 10:28 PM

Chiefs fans think the 2003 ol should be the standard. Well never see that level of play again

ThaVirus · 08-21-2015, 10:28 PM

Stephenson seemed to play well.

A lot of you guys owe Donald an apology. Talking bout he was gonna be a surprise cut. **** wrong witchu?

08-21-2015, 06:17 PM
Rain Man NFL's #1 Ermines Fan Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: My house Casino cash: $3048491 VARSITY	Preaseason Unit Discussions: Offensive Line Per the discussions earlier this week, I wanted to offer an experimental concept. During the preseason, let's discuss each of the units on the Chiefs in a particular thread. Post your thoughts during the games or between games about individual performances. This thread is for offensive linemen. How they doin'?
Posts: 141,663

08-21-2015, 10:01 PM	#31
DaneMcCloud Supporter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Hollywood, CA Casino cash: $10053648	Mathis can **** off
Posts: 88,960

08-21-2015, 10:21 PM	#40
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $2504064	They don't seem to be happy or settled at rg with anyone.
Posts: 81,434

08-21-2015, 10:28 PM	#44
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $2504064	Chiefs fans think the 2003 ol should be the standard. Well never see that level of play again
Posts: 81,434

08-21-2015, 10:28 PM	#45
ThaVirus You gotta kill a few people Join Date: Sep 2007 Casino cash: $1812369	Stephenson seemed to play well. A lot of you guys owe Donald an apology. Talking bout he was gonna be a surprise cut. **** wrong witchu?
Posts: 44,437