|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should owners get more money for producing more wins? | |||
| Yes, and it should be significant. Reward winning and burn the losers out. |
   
|
9 | 27.27% |
| Yes, but it should be a token for pride purposes. Money doesn't matter to these guys. |
  
|
5 | 15.15% |
| No. It's not necessary. These guys all want to put the best product on the field. |
  
|
9 | 27.27% |
| No. I think that tanking a season is a good thing and more teams should do it. |
  
|
1 | 3.03% |
| I am opinionless on this. I looked in my opinion bag and it's empty. |
  
|
2 | 6.06% |
| I don't think the NFL should keep track of wins and losses. It's all about participation. |
  
|
7 | 21.21% |
| Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-01-2014, 11:13 PM
|
#35 |
|
www.nfl-forecast.com
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $2151769
|
The NFL is exempt from antitrust laws. That pretty much makes it a monopoly.
As a fan, I agree that it should be a monopoly because it is the best way to put the best product on the field. But as a condition of being exempt from antitrust laws, I'd love to see a proposal such as mine to make more competition within the structure of the league. In short, I think the NFL should be a monopoly, but their owners and teams should be pressured to be more subject to artificial competitive forces since they are exempt from the major effects of typical market based forces. |
|
Posts: 45,543
  |
|
|
|
Should NFL owners get paid by the win?
Threaded Mode