|
|
02-25-2014, 03:05 PM | #1 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2014
Casino cash: $5716817
|
not ignoring the negatives at all...and I expect most of them to "fail" (not living up to their 1st round pick). that is the nature of the game. only so many guys can be at the very top... that being said though, staking them with a rating like "chance to become an nfl starter" and "chance to become a backup or a special teams player" when four of those guys are nearly guaranteed to go in the first round is lunacy. how many players get drafted in the first round, and never start? I wouldn't guess very many.
|
Posts: 6,779
|
02-25-2014, 03:15 PM | #2 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2014
Casino cash: $5716817
|
and I assumed you hadn't seen them play, because I assumed you thought the ratings were worthy, as if the guys were combine warriors without any field play. which isn't the case. I would be fine with a label like that on a guy like a kelvin Benjamin who constantly drops balls, and has only had one good season. but on a guy like Donald with 2 11 sack seasons as a DT, who also turned in a good combine, they could show him a little more love than "could become a starter or a special teams player. regardless of him being an inch or two short, and little underweight.
|
Posts: 6,779
|
|
|