Football Dana Stubblefield to miss future 49ers reunions. (Because prison.) - Page 3

**Rain Man** · 10-22-2020, 11:17 PM

Dang. I can't imagine what it would feel like to sit in a courtroom and hear that sentence handed down on you. This is a classic 'one bad decision can destroy your life' situation.

I'm not a lawyer, though, so I was a little confused about a sentence of "15 years to life". After consulting the law firm of Google and Google, Esq., it's apparently a life sentence but he can get out earlier on parole after serving a minimum of 15 years. And then that makes me wonder about all of the 'good behavior' stuff any more. So I wonder if 15 to life means that he really has to serve 15 years at a minimum or if he can start getting parole hearings sooner if he has good behavior. Anyone know how that works?

https://www.nfl.com/news/ex-nfl-play...-years-to-life

Ex-NFL player Dana Stubblefield sentenced to 15 years to life
Published: Oct 22, 2020 at 10:21 PM
logo_author_2020_logo_AP_png
Associated Press

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Former San Francisco 49er Dana Stubblefield was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison Thursday for raping a developmentally disabled woman who prosecutors said he lured to his home with the promise of a babysitting job.

The sentence was issued by a judge in San Jose after denying a defense motion for a new trial, the Mercury News reported. Last week, the Sixth District Court of Appeal denied a related petition filed on behalf of Stubblefield by his attorneys.

A jury in July found Stubblefield, 49, guilty of raping the woman with the threat of a gun. He was also convicted of forcible oral copulation and false imprisonment. He has been held in the Santa Clara County Main Jail since the verdict.

Stubblefield began his 11-year lineman career in the NFL with the 49ers in 1993 as the league's defensive rookie of the year. He later won the NFL Defensive Player of the Year honors in 1997 before leaving the team to play for Washington. He returned to the Bay Area to finish his career, playing with the 49ers in 2000-01 and the Raiders in 2003.

A day before the April 2015 assault, Stubblefield contacted the then 31-year-old woman on a baby-sitting website and arranged an interview, prosecutors said.

According to a report by the Morgan Hill Police Department, the interview lasted about 20 minutes. She later received a text from Stubblefield saying he wanted to pay her for her time that day, and she went back to the house.

After raping her, Stubblefield gave her $80 and let her go, according to the report. The woman immediately went to police and reported the rape. DNA evidence matched that of Stubblefield, the report said.

Defense attorneys argued that there was no rape and that the woman consented to sex.

Allen Sawyer, one of Stubblefield's trial attorneys, said the defense team was precluded from showing the jury strong evidence that would have supported the contention.

After the sentencing Thursday, Sawyer emphasized that the jury rejected two felony charges alleging that Stubblefield exploited a woman who was mentally incapable of providing consent to sex.

"We proved it, and the jury found that was not true," Sawyer said. "That false narrative corrupted this trial from start to finish."

**LoneWolf** · 10-23-2020, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by burt

Y'all just don't get it. From now on, I will just assume that YOU are autistic.

Graystoke · 10-23-2020, 12:16 PM

Just sentence him to the Oklahoma Eunuch Cabin and call it a day.

Oh, snacks included to defendant.

Mecca · 10-23-2020, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

I don't get what this dude is saying. The jury found it wasn't true. So how is it a false narrative if the jury said it wasn't true?

And the prosecutors claiming something on behalf of their client isn't corruption, you ****ing moron. That's how the the judicial system works. Lawyers claim your client does a bad thing, and as a defense attorney, your job is to *gasp* DEFEND your client. That's not corruption.

Look, you can claim the jury is full of shit. That's fine. But your little assessment of the trial is entirely unclear to the reader-- the only thing we know is that you're pissed that you lost.

You're a lawyer. Learn how to communicate better.

It looked to me like he was saying they weren't allowed to use their strong evidence yet he still felt they should have won the case but they got screwed by a bozo jury.

burt · 10-23-2020, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf

Not on this issue. But, hey, maybe Dana Stubblefield will take your advice in prison.....

**LoneWolf** · 10-23-2020, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by burt

Not on this issue. But, hey, maybe Dana Stubblefield will take your advice in prison.....

It was a joke, burt. Lighten the **** up. Literally nobody thinks what Adana Stubblefield did isn’t one of the worst things a human being can do.

Demonpenz · 10-23-2020, 01:02 PM

The only communication lawyers worry about is the communication to the bank where they are putting your thousands of dollars.

Pitt Gorilla · 10-23-2020, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flying High D

Couldn’t help but think back to my days in the military and the posts and bases would host Special Olympics. Every year without a doubt servicemen would get caught playing hide the green Weinie with the participants. Dana would of fit right in.

Every year? What in the actual ****?

**Rain Man** · 10-23-2020, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Every year? What in the actual ****?

That prompted me to do an image search of "special olympics women". Propriety prevents me from saying anything other than "it shouldn't happen even once."

Pitt Gorilla · 10-23-2020, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man

That prompted me to do an image search of "special olympics women". Propriety prevents me from saying anything other than "it shouldn't happen even once."

Whatever the punishment was, it clearly wasn't close to enough, in that the word wasn't getting out that, perhaps, people shouldn't be doing this horrifying stuff.

burt · 10-23-2020, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf

Yeah, Penz, it’s reerun vagina. Stop being so insensitive.

It is terrible. And I understand we joke about just about everything here. BUT I still object to the use of this word. Obviously 6 people think its funny, according to your thumbs up. I don't. I understand that you don't see the insensitivity of using this word. I am beginning to believe that there may much in this universe that you just can't grasp. Bless your heart....

Oh, and the statement about maybe Stubblefield will take your advice... that was a joke. Get it...loosen up...prison....forced anal.... just trying to help you grasp at least that joke......

CarlosCarson27 · 10-23-2020, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by burt

It is terrible. And I understand we joke about just about everything here. BUT I still object to the use of this word. Obviously 6 people think its funny, according to your thumbs up. I don't. I understand that you don't see the insensitivity of using this word. I am beginning to believe that there may much in this universe that you just can't grasp. Bless your heart....

Oh, and the statement about maybe Stubblefield will take your advice... that was a joke. Get it...loosen up...prison....forced anal.... just trying to help you grasp at least that joke......

reerun was the official medical term , when it started.
You're the one giving it a negative connotation now.
Maybe you might look up Doug Stanhope reerun, in google. Learn some history with some humor.

burt · 10-23-2020, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlosCarson88

reerun was the official medical term , when it started.
You're the one giving it a negative connotation now.
Maybe you might look up Doug Stanhope reerun, in google. Learn some history with some humor.

Wikipedia....

"reerun" has transitioned from an impartial term to one that is negatively loaded. For this reason, it is now widely considered degrading even when used in its original context.[7]

No, I am not the one giving it negative context. WIDELY CONSIDERED

CarlosCarson27 · 10-23-2020, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by burt

Wikipedia....

"reerun" has transitioned from an impartial term to one that is negatively loaded. For this reason, it is now widely considered degrading even when used in its original context.[7]

No, I am not the one giving it negative context. WIDELY CONSIDERED

Transitioned and widely considered= opinions and popular use.
I gave you a fact. A truth. The reality of the word meaning.

Yes, you are in fact the one giving it negative context because you choose to follow popular opinion.
Now do yourself a favor and stop being a reerun about it!! (Jk)

Happy Friday!!!!

burt · 10-23-2020, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlosCarson88

Transitioned and widely considered= opinions and popular use.
I gave you a fact. A truth. The reality of the word meaning.

Yes, you are in fact the one giving it negative context because you choose to follow popular opinion.
Now do yourself a favor and stop being a reerun about it!! (Jk)

Happy Friday!!!!

(jk) you did make me laugh!

**Bob Dole** · 10-23-2020, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave

Watch your vernacular, dude.

That reminds me that I’m going to try to developmentally disable the timing on my car this weekend.

10-22-2020, 11:17 PM
Rain Man NFL's #1 Ermines Fan Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: My house Casino cash: $3208491 VARSITY	Dana Stubblefield to miss future 49ers reunions. (Because prison.) Dang. I can't imagine what it would feel like to sit in a courtroom and hear that sentence handed down on you. This is a classic 'one bad decision can destroy your life' situation. I'm not a lawyer, though, so I was a little confused about a sentence of "15 years to life". After consulting the law firm of Google and Google, Esq., it's apparently a life sentence but he can get out earlier on parole after serving a minimum of 15 years. And then that makes me wonder about all of the 'good behavior' stuff any more. So I wonder if 15 to life means that he really has to serve 15 years at a minimum or if he can start getting parole hearings sooner if he has good behavior. Anyone know how that works? https://www.nfl.com/news/ex-nfl-play...-years-to-life Ex-NFL player Dana Stubblefield sentenced to 15 years to life Published: Oct 22, 2020 at 10:21 PM logo_author_2020_logo_AP_png Associated Press SAN JOSE, Calif. — Former San Francisco 49er Dana Stubblefield was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison Thursday for raping a developmentally disabled woman who prosecutors said he lured to his home with the promise of a babysitting job. The sentence was issued by a judge in San Jose after denying a defense motion for a new trial, the Mercury News reported. Last week, the Sixth District Court of Appeal denied a related petition filed on behalf of Stubblefield by his attorneys. A jury in July found Stubblefield, 49, guilty of raping the woman with the threat of a gun. He was also convicted of forcible oral copulation and false imprisonment. He has been held in the Santa Clara County Main Jail since the verdict. Stubblefield began his 11-year lineman career in the NFL with the 49ers in 1993 as the league's defensive rookie of the year. He later won the NFL Defensive Player of the Year honors in 1997 before leaving the team to play for Washington. He returned to the Bay Area to finish his career, playing with the 49ers in 2000-01 and the Raiders in 2003. A day before the April 2015 assault, Stubblefield contacted the then 31-year-old woman on a baby-sitting website and arranged an interview, prosecutors said. According to a report by the Morgan Hill Police Department, the interview lasted about 20 minutes. She later received a text from Stubblefield saying he wanted to pay her for her time that day, and she went back to the house. After raping her, Stubblefield gave her $80 and let her go, according to the report. The woman immediately went to police and reported the rape. DNA evidence matched that of Stubblefield, the report said. Defense attorneys argued that there was no rape and that the woman consented to sex. Allen Sawyer, one of Stubblefield's trial attorneys, said the defense team was precluded from showing the jury strong evidence that would have supported the contention. After the sentencing Thursday, Sawyer emphasized that the jury rejected two felony charges alleging that Stubblefield exploited a woman who was mentally incapable of providing consent to sex. "We proved it, and the jury found that was not true," Sawyer said. "That false narrative corrupted this trial from start to finish."
Posts: 141,543

10-23-2020, 12:16 PM	#32
Graystoke MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Driftless Region Casino cash: $815564	Just sentence him to the Oklahoma Eunuch Cabin and call it a day. Oh, snacks included to defendant.
Posts: 8,726

10-23-2020, 01:02 PM	#36
Demonpenz I got Rice cookin in the micro Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Apartment "G UNIT!" Casino cash: $3072136	The only communication lawyers worry about is the communication to the bank where they are putting your thousands of dollars. __________________
Posts: 54,280