If Our Offense is #1 Without Hill...

[Direckshun]

Do you entertain the notion that we could trade him?

If our offense is the best in the league, and it may not be considering what’s going on in New England, but isn’t this a conversation worth having?

Imagine what he could net you in a trade.

A 1st plus additional picks.

Patrick Peterson.

etc etc

I know Hill is popular, but if we’re already unstoppable, maybe he could make us better by netting us resources we need in other spots.

[Direckshun]

For the record, I don’t think we should trade him at this time.

But I do think, if we still steamroll the Ravens like we did the Jags, that it’s worth a conversation.

[Bowser]

Not a chance. Hill, in this offense when healthy, is just too damned dynamic on too many levels to even consider trading away. The plays he opens up JUST GOING IN MOTION is worth keeping him for as long as he can produce.

In this era of NFL football where offenses reign supreme, you absolutely do NOT trade away a player of Hill's magnitude.

[New World Order]

Even if we run up 40 on Baltimore that's too small of a sample size.

[O.city]

No.


End thread.

[warrior]

Originally Posted by O.city

No.


End thread.

This-should have been the first response

[Chief Roundup]

Jesus this is just stupid. Why would we trade him now that he has signed a contract extension? Come On Man.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Good Lord, no. Hill at #1 allows Sammy to be #2. That's a great thing.

[Ubeja Vontell]

Hill being out right now, is going to help the other guys working with Mahomes, but.....they need ZOOOMMMM, he needs to retire a Chief/

[Bump]

**** no

[rtmike]

Hardman was his replacement so the team had prepared.
So far we’re seeing what it would have been like w/o Hill. Not as doom and gloom as everyone expected, lol.
As the season progresses, teams will start playing Hardman like they do Hill imo.

Maybe not think so much about moving Hill, but Robinson’s playing on the last year of his contract and Watkins. Our #3-4 WR is #2-3 on other rosters so why not flip one of the last year contract guys for a dB? Does Jacksonville need WRs, lol? Already have one of our WRs., Conley.

Ramsey’s about the last decent dB available before deadline that we know about?



Arizona isn’t gonna give PP up either imo. Not with them playing inspired football.

[Chargem]

Putting 40 up on the Ravens without Hill probably makes me feel better about having to cut or trade Watkins next year for cap reasons I guess?

Although I still don't feel great about that because DRob is probably a goner too.

[rtmike]

Originally Posted by Chargem

Putting 40 up on the Ravens without Hill probably makes me feel better about having to cut or trade Watkins next year for cap reasons I guess?

Although I still don't feel great about that because DRob is probably a goner too.

So who would next years starters be besides Hardman and Hill? No one else under contract if they cut Watkins iirc?
Not having a possession WR would be ok with Kelce. I don’t think he runs many te routes anyways, lol.

Andy said Drob is a Superstar in the making too.

[Chargem]

Originally Posted by rtmike

So who would next years starters be besides Hardman and Hill? No one else under contract if they cut Watkins iirc?
Not having a possession WR would be ok with Kelce. I don’t think he runs many te routes anyways, lol.

Andy said Drob is a Superstar in the making too.

Drob is almost certainly not worth the money he will get.

If you let Watkins go, or trade him, you're looking for contributions from Thompson, Kemp, Dieter, Pringle. I agree that's not an ideal scenario.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

What a loon