Sell me on Mike Glennon

[O.city]

I think runkc would rather us take bray or Manuel at 1. Less risk more upside. Numbers don't matter

[KCrockaholic]

Originally Posted by O.city

I think runkc would rather us take bray or Manuel at 1. Less risk more upside. Numbers don't matter

Ha. I understand this is a joke but Manuel and especially Bray carry more risk than nearly anyone in the draft as far as QB's go. Of course risk is based on round value though.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic

Ha. I understand this is a joke but Manuel and especially Bray carry more risk than nearly anyone in the draft as far as QB's go. Of course risk is based on round value though.

It doesn't matter to him. Anyone But Geno.


Geno is garbage anyway. We don't want him. He can't successfully run an offense in the NFL. Lacks any arm strength, focus, or will to win. He's somewhat accurate, thats about it.


Better go with Wilson. He's not afraid to get hit. According to this most recent report, he has shit asshole accuracy, but he's a good ole boy.

[KCrockaholic]

Originally Posted by O.city

It doesn't matter to him. Anyone But Geno.


Geno is garbage anyway. We don't want him. He can't successfully run an offense in the NFL. Lacks any arm strength, focus, or will to win. He's somewhat accurate, thats about it.


Better go with Wilson. He's not afraid to get hit. According to this most recent report, he has shit asshole accuracy, but he's a good ole boy.

Glad I haven't paid any attention to that then.

And I don't hate Wilson. I just don't like him. He's a 2nd round guy to me. 2nd round talent that will be taken in the first because that's where QB's go.

IMO Geno is the ONLY QB that is a legit 1st round talent in this draft. Mike Glennon is close, right on the verge actually. But he has plenty of negatives as well.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

I think runkc would rather us take bray or Manuel at 1. Less risk more upside. Numbers don't matter

JFC O.City stop with the bullshit man. I want to draft a QB at 1.

Man question Geno at all here and you get crucified.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by RunKC

JFC O.City stop with the bullshit man. I want to draft a QB at 1.

Man question Geno at all here and you get crucified.

Yeah, youre passive aggressive bullshit is probably what gets you crucified.


So, should we question Wilson after that article? Cause according to that, dude should def. be a 3rd rounder.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

Yeah, youre passive aggressive bullshit is probably what gets you crucified.


So, should we question Wilson after that article? Cause according to that, dude should def. be a 3rd rounder.

I've seen several people get crucified for questioning Geno.

And if that's how you feel, go for it.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by RunKC

I've seen several people get crucified for questioning Geno.

And if that's how you feel, go for it.

If you want to have a serious conversation about his flaws, fine. They are there.


If you want to keep coming with the "I want a Qb at 1, but Geno is assfart from a shitty system and threw up a gang sign" stuff fine.


But don't bitch up when someone calls you on it and go straight to "the pro Geno guys are hassling me, this place is a geno ball washing forum".


So what about Wilson, if Geno is going under the microscope, lets flip the lens a little. I thought you told me how accurate he was and how he was great at pushing it down the field.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

If you want to have a serious conversation about his flaws, fine. They are there.


If you want to keep coming with the "I want a Qb at 1, but Geno is assfart from a shitty system and threw up a gang sign" stuff fine.


But don't bitch up when someone calls you on it and go straight to "the pro Geno guys are hassling me, this place is a geno ball washing forum".


So what about Wilson, if Geno is going under the microscope, lets flip the lens a little. I thought you told me how accurate he was and how he was great at pushing it down the field.

Sure. It appears he is about as accurate with 20+ yard passes as most of the others. Surprisingly Barkley was the best and he has the weakest arm.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by RunKC

I've seen several douchebags get crucified for questioning Geno.

And if that's how you feel, go for it.

FYP.

And they get crucified for being gay little douchebags, not because they question Geno, provided their concerns are legit.

With that graph you posted, I don't really give a shit about how the yards divide up. It's not like 4TH QUARTER EQWILLS CLUUUUUTCHHHHHH!!!! in every scenario.

If Tyler Wilson has that great of a percentage of his output in the 4th quarter why did his team lose so many games? Could it be.... garbage time??

Noooooo, surely not, nooooo

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by SNR

FYP.

And they get crucified for being gay little douchebags, not because they question Geno, provided their concerns are legit.

With that graph you posted, I don't really give a shit about how the yards divide up. It's not like 4TH QUARTER EQWILLS CLUUUUUTCHHHHHH!!!! in every scenario.

If Tyler Wilson has that great of a percentage of his output in the 4th quarter why did his team lose so many games? Could it be.... garbage time??

Noooooo, surely not, nooooo

Exactly what I'm talking about right here O.city ^^^

I wish you would discuss this legitimately SNR, instead of going to blasting defense mode.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Exactly what I'm talking about right here O.city ^^^

I wish you would discuss this legitimately SNR, instead of going to blasting defense mode.

I didn't call you a gay little douchebag.

I'm discussing it. I said I don't care about that graph. It's not an important stat to me or many other people, otherwise that kind of stuff would be more heavily valued and prevalent in the makeup of all QBs.

I think Tyler Wilson is still going to be a good pro. I think Geno Smith, however, will be a better one.

I've got a question for YOU, grasshopper. Why is it whenever somebody posts a critique of Geno that gets refuted, it's "overly defensive?" I added in a bunch of other colorful words to make my point, but I do that all the time. It's nothing personal.