Daniel Jeremiah: Many expect Chiefs to trade up for a CB

[Stryker]

I don't think the Chiefs will trade up into the first round. I think they stay put and hopefully, draft wisely with the 8 picks that they have.

[BryanBusby]

I could see them easily parting with one of the 4ths to move up 5-10 slots if a guy Veach is locked in on gets within range. Nothing wrong with that.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

I could see them easily parting with one of the 4ths to move up 5-10 slots if a guy Veach is locked in on gets within range. Nothing wrong with that.

Think that would be enough? I'm guessing it might take one of the extra thirds.

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by O.city

Think that would be enough? I'm guessing it might take one of the extra thirds.

Would be plenty.

[O.city]

Yeah, I don't know how good that 2nd next year will be.

I wonder if they could flip it for a player elsewhere. I know that makes contracts weird though.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by O.city

Yeah, I don't know how good that 2nd next year will be.

I wonder if they could flip it for a player elsewhere. I know that makes contracts weird though.

It would be like a throw in imo. Which would be like taking pennies on the dollar

[O.city]

If there are that many guys with first round grades, I think it actually shows the opposite that the class is pretty weak. Not many guys separating themselves.

[BossChief]

In 2007, NE traded their 28th pick to SF for that years 4th and next years first
In 2009, NE traded back twice for future draft picks that turned into Gronk
In 2011, they traded back 4 times and one was for a future pick they used on Chandler Jones.
In 2013, NE traded down and out of the first
In 2016 they traded down twice

From 2001-2016 NE traded down 36 times.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by BossChief

In 2007, NE traded their 28th pick to SF for that years 4th and next years first
In 2009, NE traded back twice for future draft picks that turned into Gronk
In 2011, they traded back 4 times and one was for a future pick they used on Chandler Jones.
In 2013, NE traded down and out of the first
In 2016 they traded down twice

From 2001-2016 NE traded down 36 times.

The only one where you mentioned compensation they got a 1st back.

That's their usual mo.

Why would they take a 2nd next year woven they want a qb this year? Why would they take less than a 1st back?


You are dreaming imo


Edit they drafted Jones with a first so they got one in that trade too

[O.city]

They didn't need a future Qb those years. Now they do. I bet they trade UP this year.

[RunKC]

On 610 Terez said Dorsey was more of a “gather more picks for more value” guy while Veach is a “get good players period” kinda guy and trusts his scouting to find the right players.

There likely won’t be value at 54 or even 44 for guys that will be there at 32-37. Think about it...5 QB’s are projected to go in the first rd and 2-3 RB’s. Defensive talent is going to slide down the board a bit.

If Veach trades up, he won’t half ass it. He’s going to be aggressive.

[Buckweath]

Originally Posted by RunKC

On 610 Terez said Dorsey was more of a “gather more picks for more value” guy while Veach is a “get good players period” kinda guy and trusts his scouting to find the right players.

There likely won’t be value at 54 or even 44 for guys that will be there at 32-37. Think about it...5 QB’s are projected to go in the first rd and 2-3 RB’s. Defensive talent is going to slide down the board a bit.

If Veach trades up, he won’t half ass it. He’s going to be aggressive.

I think the world of Dorsey as far as drafting goes.

Here's an article which pretends that you should diversify the risk: https://www.vox.com/2015/4/30/851600...raft-economics

I had read a different but similar article some time ago showing the virtues of collecting multiple picks.

I just hope Veach is not over-agressive because of his lack of experience as a GM.

Even when you really love a player and want to trade up for him, you should globally always look to diversify the risk because there is no such thing as a sure thing.

[Tribal Warfare]

Originally Posted by Buckweath

I

I had read a different but similar article some time ago showing the virtues of collecting multiple picks.

I just hope Veach is not over-agressive because of his lack of experience as a GM.

Even when you really love a player and want to trade up for him, you should globally always look to diversify the risk because there is no such thing as a sure thing.

Veach's aggressiveness the most difficult issue to predict, as you can see everyone went apeshit when I posted "nightmare scenarios".

I'd rather garner selections for next season since we acquired Mahomes at the expense of the 2018 draft.

[Mother****erJones]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Veach's aggressiveness the most difficult issue to predict, as you can see everyone went apeshit when I posted "nightmare scenarios".

I'd rather garner selections for next season since we acquired Mahomes at the expense of the 2018 draft.

Because trading Hill is beyond a dumbass post.

[Shag]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Veach's aggressiveness the most difficult issue to predict, as you can see everyone went apeshit when I posted "nightmare scenarios".

I'd rather garner selections for next season since we acquired Mahomes at the expense of the 2018 draft.

TIL that giving up your 1st rounder mortgages the entire draft.