ChiefsPlanet OK, here's the deal... - Page 136

**DaFace** · 04-12-2011, 03:26 PM

As much fun as all of the controversy has been the last couple days, the mods have discussed all of this craziness (yes, there are enough of us to have discussion now!) and decided to clarify a few things. So...here ya go.

The rules aren't changing. They're the same as they've been for years.
We WILL be trying to enforce them a little more consistently. Things like bypassing the filters and threats will be handled when reported, and sometimes when they're not. Just depends on how cranky we are.
However, we aren't going to go banning people on sight unless they either refuse to comply or have been a repeat offender. You'll get a warning or two if you're doing something that's iffy.
The infractions system is not meant to be used to rapid-fire infractions to get someone banned. Anyone who uses them for that purpose (unless you're killing spammers) will lose the privs immediately.

That said, Hootie fully reinstated and can consider this a warning that he went too far. CC can consider this a warning not to abuse the infractions system (as can H5N1). GoChiefs would be unbanned as well, but you can't come back screaming "**** the mods" and expect that to be all fine and dandy. However, his sentence is being reduced back to two weeks. He needs some time to work on his next video anyway.

I know this whole deal has been a bit of a mess, but just wanted to reemphasize that nothing's changing. In general, don't be a douchebag, and you'll be fine. The end.

**AustinChief** · 04-15-2011, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Glad you find it funny.

I'm out.

I'm either getting trolled, or I'm arguing with two psychopaths that think it's fully acceptable - and even funny - to **** a girl that is blackout drunk.

pretty sure it transcends just morally wrong and is clearly in the ILLEGAL category.

-King- · 04-15-2011, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Maybe I'm reading that wrong, but that doesn't seem to be "Em" putting her up to it, given that it's expressly denied.

I read that as: I asked the roommate if "Em" had put her up to that, to which she denied.

Because in the next sentence, he says that he made his way over to Em. He couldn't have asked Em without making his way over there first.

keg in kc · 04-15-2011, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief

pretty sure it transcends just morally wrong and is clearly in the ILLEGAL category.

Agree with that.

Just Passin' By · 04-15-2011, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

I read that as: I asked the roommate if "Em" had put her up to that, to which she denied.

Because in the next sentence, he says that he made his way over to Em. He couldn't have asked Em without making his way over there first.

That's my point. If the roommate denied "Em" putting her up to it, how is that evidence of desire on Em's part? You make that implication:

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Hey man! Emily DID NOT want to have sex. Even though she told her friend that she did. Trust me, OTWP talked to Emily herself and she told him that she didn't want to.

The friend is denying that, right?

Frazod · 04-15-2011, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Same guy. He's the one judging hootie, not me. Weird that you, I mean he would project, though.

Yeah, judging him based on the things he trumpets about with obvious joy and pride. Funny, I don't remember being gleeful about getting divorced, or proud that I had a drug problem. Yeah, I've dealt with some shit in my life. Probably would have killed a pussy like you, but I'm pretty resilient. I overcame, adapted, moved on. Happily married for 10 years now, clean for 15, have a good job, a good life, and I did it all on my own. I'm not really sure why you think that makes me a bad person, but somehow I think not rating the approval of an asshole like you is probably a good thing.

And unlike certain eternally anonymous twats who infest this place and hide behind the veil of cyberspace and cast barbs at those who don't (I'm totally awesome - trust me!), these things can actually be verified.

**BigRedChief** · 04-15-2011, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

I'm sure they are much more offensive than posts that try to seriously accuse someone of rape.

If you have sex with a passed out women who has no clue what is happening, has not given consent beforehand...thats rape. At least in my book.

One time when I was 17 at a party some guy was ****ing a "party" girl. She had been flirting with everyone, was drunk when she showed up. But I made a wrong turn trying to find the bathroom and there he was going at it and she was totally out of it. A limp rag. I don't him to stop. He didn't. i warned him again. I roundhoused kicked him off and broke two of his ribs. I went and got her friends and they got some guys to carry her out and took her to the hospital for alchohol poisioning. I saw him at a party about 6 months later and I kicked his ass again just on general principle.

-King- · 04-15-2011, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

That's my point. If the roommate denied "Em" putting her up to it, how is that evidence of desire on Em's part? You make that implication:

The friend is denying that, right?

No, I'm saying Em did not tell the friend to go ask.

Thats like me saying I want to play football.

That doesn't mean I put you up to telling Haley to let me on the team.

**BigRedChief** · 04-15-2011, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

And unlike certain eternally anonymous twats who infest this place and hide behind the veil of cyberspace and cast barbs at those who don't (I'm totally awesome - trust me!), these things can actually be verified.

I'll vouch for Frazod. He turned me on to some of the best beer I've ever had. As far as friends go....the one that introduces you to one of your favorite beers is a friend for life.

seclark · 04-15-2011, 06:05 PM

this place could use a giant, super duper kotex.
wring it out and slap it back on for another 3 posts.
ferchristsakes.

sec

**Reaper16** · 04-15-2011, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

I...I feel so proud...

Yeah, but only because you locked MY thread and subverted its traffic towards your shiny, new thread. You cheated, basically.

-King- · 04-15-2011, 06:06 PM

DISCLAIMER: Hootie was wrong with ****ing that girl

I'm not defending it. I'm just saying that it wasn't rape from the info we have.

Just Passin' By · 04-15-2011, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

No, I'm saying Em did not tell the friend to go ask.

Thats like me saying I want to play football.

That doesn't mean I put you up to telling Haley to let me on the team.

Then where's the evidence in that thread that "Em" told her friend she wanted the sex?

**AustinChief** · 04-15-2011, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

If you have sex with a passed out women who has no clue what is happening, has not given consent beforehand...thats rape. At least in my book.

One time when I was 17 at a party some guy was ****ing a "party" girl. She had been flirting with everyone, was drunk when she showed up. But I made a wrong turn trying to find the bathroom and there he was going at it and she was totally out of it. A limp rag. I don't him to stop. He didn't. i warned him again. I roundhoused kicked him off and broke two of his ribs. I went and got her friends and they got some guys to carry her out and took her to the hospital for alchohol poisioning. I saw him at a party about 6 months later and I kicked his ass again just on general principle.

Damn man! I'm surprised that didn't kill him, I wouldn't want a roundhouse from you! BTW, Nice work.

Frazod · 04-15-2011, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

I'll vouch for Frazod. He turned me on to some of the best beer I've ever had. As far as friends go....the one that introduces you to one of your favorite beers is a friend for life.

I guess that means I'm a drunk, too. Saul will certainly think so, and he's right about everything.

keg in kc · 04-15-2011, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

If you have sex with a passed out women who has no clue what is happening, has not given consent beforehand...thats rape.

It is.

04-12-2011, 03:26 PM
DaFace Kind of a mod Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Donkey Land Casino cash: $-1663101	OK, here's the deal... As much fun as all of the controversy has been the last couple days, the mods have discussed all of this craziness (yes, there are enough of us to have discussion now!) and decided to clarify a few things. So...here ya go. The rules aren't changing. They're the same as they've been for years. We WILL be trying to enforce them a little more consistently. Things like bypassing the filters and threats will be handled when reported, and sometimes when they're not. Just depends on how cranky we are. However, we aren't going to go banning people on sight unless they either refuse to comply or have been a repeat offender. You'll get a warning or two if you're doing something that's iffy. The infractions system is not meant to be used to rapid-fire infractions to get someone banned. Anyone who uses them for that purpose (unless you're killing spammers) will lose the privs immediately. That said, Hootie fully reinstated and can consider this a warning that he went too far. CC can consider this a warning not to abuse the infractions system (as can H5N1). GoChiefs would be unbanned as well, but you can't come back screaming "**** the mods" and expect that to be all fine and dandy. However, his sentence is being reduced back to two weeks. He needs some time to work on his next video anyway. I know this whole deal has been a bit of a mess, but just wanted to reemphasize that nothing's changing. In general, don't be a douchebag, and you'll be fine. The end.
Posts: 53,124

04-15-2011, 06:05 PM	#2034
seclark MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: nemo Casino cash: $-410100	this place could use a giant, super duper kotex. wring it out and slap it back on for another 3 posts. ferchristsakes. sec __________________ "Mr. seclark. Wrong for gravy, wrong for jelly, wrong for biscuits." -rj "If every Planeteer who was disliked by another Planeteer stopped being a Planeteer we wouldn't have any Planeteers." -rj
Posts: 13,447

04-15-2011, 06:06 PM	#2036
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $-1204257	DISCLAIMER: Hootie was wrong with ****ing that girl I'm not defending it. I'm just saying that it wasn't rape from the info we have. __________________ 🏁
Posts: 65,458