***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[Chiefspants]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Lets cancel March Madness the betters will go crazy.

That hasn’t been discussed yet, but playing b-ball in empty stadiums sure has.

[displacedinMN]

Originally Posted by Chiefspants

That hasn’t been discussed yet, but playing b-ball in empty stadiums sure has.

still trying to decide what to do with the NCAA wrestling tourney here

[CasselGotPeedOn]

Originally Posted by Chiefspants

That hasn’t been discussed yet, but playing b-ball in empty stadiums sure has.

Terrible idea. Just cancel the damn tournament if they're not gonna have fans.

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Originally Posted by Chiefspants

That hasn’t been discussed yet, but playing b-ball in empty stadiums sure has.

Houston is a potential regional site for KU. https://t.co/A1qRL5jQC5

— Sam Mellinger (@mellinger) March 11, 2020

[PAChiefsGuy]

Originally Posted by Third Eye

Yeah, people are going to spend their disposable income, just in different ways. There is no doubt that there will be local impacts, but writ large, there shouldn’t be much of an impact. That is of course unless there is an impact to the labor force population, but since this effects mostly people over 60, that seems unlikely.

Yeah the coronavirus will have no impact on economy whatsoever! I guess that explains why DOW Jones isn't seeing much if an impact so far.

Oh wait....

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed

https://www.worldometers.info/corona...-demographics/

0.002 x 1,000 = 2 people out that many die who are 20-39 years old. That isn't even taking into account men, who are more likely to die from it.

Acceptable risk to you? This doesn't even include old people who are dropping like flies from 8% to 18%. But real young adults.

This is as contagious as the common cold. If it remains unchecked and affects 20-40% of the 330 million Americans, you can see who this is a problem.

[Spott]

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn

Terrible idea. Just cancel the damn tournament if they're not gonna have fans.

In the year in which KU has it’s best chance to win the tournament in a while...

[007]

Originally Posted by DaFace

Most places aren't going to be giving refunds if they don't cancel the event.

If they are concerned for health that shouldn't matter

[SupDock]

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn

Terrible idea. Just cancel the damn tournament if they're not gonna have fans.

Why?
They will televise the games.

[CasselGotPeedOn]

Originally Posted by SupDock

Why?
They will televise the games.

No one wants to watch a ****ing scrimmage

[FD]

Originally Posted by Third Eye

Yeah, people are going to spend their disposable income, just in different ways. There is no doubt that there will be local impacts, but writ large, there shouldn’t be much of an impact. That is of course unless there is an impact to the labor force population, but since this effects mostly people over 60, that seems unlikely.

I think this is mostly right and the markets are overreacting. Disease outbreaks have never caused a recession. People drastically overestimate the size of entertainment type services to the total economy and the money saved on those things can be put into other purchases later this year.

The concern would be if the economy was already weak and the virus is what pops the bubble, that could be if there are large pockets of debt and risk on the books such that even a small demand shock can cause businesses to go under.

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy

Yeah the coronavirus will have no impact on economy whatsoever! I guess that explains why DOW Jones isn't seeing much if an impact so far.

Oh wait....

I'm just talking about spending related to conferences and big gatherings. Disposable income usually finds a path out of the household. But yeah, if people aren't working and making money to get disposable income, that becomes a big issue, obviously.

[SupDock]

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn

No one wants to watch a ****ing scrimmage

I would watch it, and would estimate millions of others would. An empty stadium wouldn't make it a scrimmage.

I would imagine the teams and cable companies would want the games to happen too

[CasselGotPeedOn]

Originally Posted by SupDock

I would watch it. No fans wouldn't make it a scrimmage.

It would be awful

[Mecca]

It would be hilarious to hear the players yelling all types of swear words cause the mics would pick up everything.