ChiefsPlanet Should this BB be more tightly moderated?

**luv** · 08:17 AM

Due to recent events, just thought I'd pose the question.

While I don't think posters should think mods will do something just because they want them to, I do think there are a few things that should be considered out of bounds that aren't. On the other hand, I've learned to just go with the flow. Do I comment back knowing that I will sound like a whiny bitch sometimes? Sure. It's entertaining. Also, people need some drama. I'd rather have mine on a BB than IRL.

What say ye?

Crush · 03-20-2011, 08:08 AM

Mr. Plow · 03-20-2011, 08:08 AM

Crush · 03-20-2011, 08:10 AM

Dane left on his own. CP does not need its own Fire Decree. Yes, I did just Godwin the thread.

**luv** · 03-20-2011, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crush

Dane left on his own. CP does not need its own Fire Decree. Yes, I did just Godwin the thread.

Oh, I agree. There's just been so much arguing over what should have been a bannable offense. Was that heat-of-the-moment arguing, or do people really think more things should be bannable?

milkman · 03-20-2011, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv

Oh, I agree. There's just been so much arguing over what should have been a bannable offense. Was that heat-of-the-moment arguing, or do people really think more things should be bannable?

Dane leaving over that shit is just stupidity.

If someone calls you a name that questions your character, when they wouldn't know you from jack if they saw you on the street, then that insult has no weight.

It's just blowhard bull.

BIG_DADDY · 03-20-2011, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

Dane leaving over that shit is just stupidity.

If someone calls you a name that questions your character, when they wouldn't know you from jack if they saw you on the street, then that insult has no weight.

It's just blowhard bull.

Dane left?

JOhn · 03-20-2011, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv

Oh, I agree. There's just been so much arguing over what should have been a bannable offense. Was that heat-of-the-moment arguing, or do people really think more things should be bannable?

We have this same shit come up almost every year, and every year it goes down in flames.....as it should

TLO · 06-13-2023, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv

Oh, I agree. There's just been so much arguing over what should have been a bannable offense. Was that heat-of-the-moment arguing, or do people really think more things should be bannable?

Good question

TwistedChief · 06-13-2023, 05:46 PM

If luv wants to tighten the rules, the rules should be tightened. That's just basic logic.

**luv** · 06-14-2023, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief

If luv wants to tighten the rules, the rules should be tightened. That's just basic logic.

Well...yeah.

(Still, I voted no, FTR. )

Anyway, while reading through some of this thread, I noticed how just how many awesome posters we've lost over the years, whether by death or just leaving.

Phobia
KcMizzou
JOhn
Fire Me Boy!
milkman
Over-Head
Mr. Flopnuts
Nzoner

**Donger** · 03-20-2011, 08:11 AM

Yes, absolutely. Draconian enforcement of the highest order.

A temparary banning for a mistake in spelling? Yes.

**Saul Good** · 03-20-2011, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

Yes, absolutely. Draconian enforcement of the highest order.

A temparary banning for a mistake in spelling? Yes.

Anyone who transposes "do" and "due" shall receive the banhammer.

**Fire Me Boy!** · 03-20-2011, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

Yes, absolutely. Draconian enforcement of the highest order.

A temparary banning for a mistake in spelling? Yes.

This part of your post includes not only a misspelling, but it also is not a complete sentence. You should receive double temporary ban.

**Donger** · 03-20-2011, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

This part of your post includes not only a misspelling, but it also is not a complete sentence. You should receive double temporary ban.

It's about time one of you troglodytes saw that.

View Poll Results: Should mods tighten the leash?
Yes, definitely.	19	8.80%
No, definitely not.	176	81.48%
Depends on the rules (list rules that should be followed more strictly or new ones that you would like to see below).	21	9.72%
Voters: 216. You may not vote on this poll

03-20-2011, 08:07 AM	Topic Starter
luv MY LITTLE #15 Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Springfield, MO Casino cash: $5939600	Should this BB be more tightly moderated? Due to recent events, just thought I'd pose the question. While I don't think posters should think mods will do something just because they want them to, I do think there are a few things that should be considered out of bounds that aren't. On the other hand, I've learned to just go with the flow. Do I comment back knowing that I will sound like a whiny bitch sometimes? Sure. It's entertaining. Also, people need some drama. I'd rather have mine on a BB than IRL. What say ye? Last edited by luv; 03-20-2011 at 08:17 AM..
Posts: 63,455

03-20-2011, 08:08 AM	#2
Crush Amateur Poster Join Date: Mar 2004 Casino cash: $4817091	NO
Posts: 15,298

03-20-2011, 08:08 AM	#3
Mr. Plow In Search of a Life Join Date: Dec 2005 Casino cash: $1507391	No.
Posts: 30,864

03-20-2011, 08:10 AM	#4
Crush Amateur Poster Join Date: Mar 2004 Casino cash: $4817091	Dane left on his own. CP does not need its own Fire Decree. Yes, I did just Godwin the thread.
Posts: 15,298

06-13-2023, 05:46 PM	#10
TwistedChief Why so serious? Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: Chicago Casino cash: $1890415	If luv wants to tighten the rules, the rules should be tightened. That's just basic logic.
Posts: 12,436

03-20-2011, 08:11 AM	#12
Donger "Think BOOM!" Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: 33.675° N 106.475° W Casino cash: $9819900 VARSITY	Yes, absolutely. Draconian enforcement of the highest order. A temparary banning for a mistake in spelling? Yes. __________________ I think the young people enjoy it when I "get down," verbally, don't you?
Posts: 182,439