Chiefs Denver has not beaten a team with a winning record either - Page 8

Red Dawg · 10-30-2013, 06:22 PM

Fugging media has us eating shit over this every week. Donkeys lost to the only team they played that's considered good. We beat Tenn when they were 3-1. Dallas after they had won a game the first week. Philly when they were still being pumped as good. Seriously WtF? Donkeys have done the same.

GloryDayz · 11-03-2013, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oh_snap

Denver is proven. We're not. While we went 2-14 last year, Denver was 13-3. People expect Denver to be good. We are still a massive question mark in the eyes of many. Is our success a result of an incredibly easy schedule? Are we a flash in the pan like the 2010 Chiefs, or the 2011 Lions? Gotta prove that we are more than just a flash in the pan to gain respect. Winning the AFC West will go a long ways in making that point.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, we could go lossless this year and the talking heads will say it had to do more with anything except us being good. Easy schedule, starting QBs we face, Fox's heart, the moon's gravity......anything. The bottom line is the NFL financially fears too many smaller market teams being in the mix. They don't mind a few, but at some point matchups like KC v Arizona or Carolina v. Jacksonville getting too deep into the playoff picture is going to hurt their pockets. Ask them, they'll deny it.... That's how you know it's true - because they'll dismiss it outright.

Mother****erJones · 11-03-2013, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

I've said it before and I'll say it again, we could go lossless this year and the talking heads will say it had to do more with anything except us being good. Easy schedule, starting QBs we face, Fox's heart, the moon's gravity......anything. The bottom line is the NFL financially fears too many smaller market teams being in the mix. They don't mind a few, but at some point matchups like KC v Arizona or Carolina v. Jacksonville getting too deep into the playoff picture is going to hurt their pockets. Ask them, they'll deny it.... That's how you know it's true - because they'll dismiss it outright.

Lossless?

GloryDayz · 11-03-2013, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones

Lossless?

It's a protocol...

RINGLEADER · 11-03-2013, 09:19 AM

Denver has not only not played anyone with a winning record (well, they did against Indy, but they lost) but they also have never played anyone at the time they played who had a winning record. At least KC went up against some teams with a winning percentage north of .500, as well as a couple of teams at .500.

Broncos can't say the same.

KC gets beat up because we win close games (3 of them) with defense. When the Broncos win close games they have to score 50 points and boy isn't Manning amazing. But when you cut right down to it, they have not only not played winning teams, they didn't even play them when they were winning.

Pasta Little Brioni · 11-03-2013, 09:22 AM

KC is a team loaded with talent and an average QB.

Denver is an average talented team with a talented QB.

Denver has REALLY struggled against quality teams the last couple years...let's see how KC does.

Mother****erJones · 11-03-2013, 09:30 AM

KC is the only team in Peyton's 25 games with Denver, to hold him under 20 points. We did it last year in KC.

9er guy · 11-03-2013, 09:48 AM

The Chiefs haven't beat anybody with a winning record either I don't think.

Maybe they had a winning record AT THE TIME. But I don't think you've beat a team that's over .500 as of right now.

Kinda the pot calling the kettle black IMO.

9er guy · 11-03-2013, 09:49 AM

You're BOTH playing bad teams....I think that's the underlying point here.

Pasta Little Brioni · 11-03-2013, 09:52 AM

Could it be the teams we both faced have looked worse due to playing both the KC and Denver juggernauts? For ****'s sake would you rather we had lost to give them winning records?

**hometeam** · 11-03-2013, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9er guy

The Chiefs haven't beat anybody with a winning record either I don't think.

Maybe they had a winning record AT THE TIME. But I don't think you've beat a team that's over .500 as of right now.

Kinda the pot calling the kettle black IMO.

9er guy · 11-03-2013, 09:54 AM

/sarcasm?

9er guy · 11-03-2013, 09:57 AM

Oh Snap!................I'm a fukin dumbass.....carry on

**Rausch** · 11-03-2013, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9er guy

Oh Snap!................I'm a fukin dumbass.....carry on

That's better...

gosampel · 11-03-2013, 10:05 AM

wins and lost is all that count it gets the job done we could be 2-5 like a last year run

9er guy · 11-03-2013, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch

That's better...

10-30-2013, 06:22 PM
Red Dawg Going home eventually Join Date: Dec 2002 Casino cash: $4772858	Denver has not beaten a team with a winning record either Fugging media has us eating shit over this every week. Donkeys lost to the only team they played that's considered good. We beat Tenn when they were 3-1. Dallas after they had won a game the first week. Philly when they were still being pumped as good. Seriously WtF? Donkeys have done the same.
Posts: 30,406

11-03-2013, 09:19 AM	#109
RINGLEADER In Search of a Life Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Confusion, USA Casino cash: $8620503	Denver has not only not played anyone with a winning record (well, they did against Indy, but they lost) but they also have never played anyone at the time they played who had a winning record. At least KC went up against some teams with a winning percentage north of .500, as well as a couple of teams at .500. Broncos can't say the same. KC gets beat up because we win close games (3 of them) with defense. When the Broncos win close games they have to score 50 points and boy isn't Manning amazing. But when you cut right down to it, they have not only not played winning teams, they didn't even play them when they were winning.
Posts: 46,692

11-03-2013, 09:22 AM	#110
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $3998880	KC is a team loaded with talent and an average QB. Denver is an average talented team with a talented QB. Denver has REALLY struggled against quality teams the last couple years...let's see how KC does.
Posts: 68,463

11-03-2013, 09:48 AM	#112
9er guy Jackmerius Tacktheritrix Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: ATX Casino cash: $10005834	The Chiefs haven't beat anybody with a winning record either I don't think. Maybe they had a winning record AT THE TIME. But I don't think you've beat a team that's over .500 as of right now. Kinda the pot calling the kettle black IMO. __________________ YOU WILL GET THIS WORK!!
Posts: 905

11-03-2013, 09:49 AM	#113
9er guy Jackmerius Tacktheritrix Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: ATX Casino cash: $10005834	You're BOTH playing bad teams....I think that's the underlying point here. __________________ YOU WILL GET THIS WORK!!
Posts: 905

11-03-2013, 09:52 AM	#114
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $3998880	Could it be the teams we both faced have looked worse due to playing both the KC and Denver juggernauts? For ****'s sake would you rather we had lost to give them winning records?
Posts: 68,463

11-03-2013, 09:54 AM	#116
9er guy Jackmerius Tacktheritrix Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: ATX Casino cash: $10005834	/sarcasm? __________________ YOU WILL GET THIS WORK!!
Posts: 905

11-03-2013, 09:57 AM	#117
9er guy Jackmerius Tacktheritrix Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: ATX Casino cash: $10005834	Oh Snap!................I'm a fukin dumbass.....carry on __________________ YOU WILL GET THIS WORK!!
Posts: 905

11-03-2013, 10:05 AM	#119
gosampel Starter Join Date: Sep 2013 Casino cash: $10005418	wins and lost is all that count it gets the job done we could be 2-5 like a last year run
Posts: 420