|
|
View Poll Results: If no QB then who? | |||
LT Luke Joekel | 40 | 31.01% | |
DE Star Lotulelei | 30 | 23.26% | |
LB Jarvis Jones | 19 | 14.73% | |
Other (who, why?) | 40 | 31.01% | |
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-12-2013, 11:25 PM | #9 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
@TheJeffReport convince me that the Chiefs not drafting a QB number one overall is the smart thing to do #TwitterTuesday The inconvenient truth is that the Chiefs stunk one year too late. The NFL personnel community is unanimous that there is no sure franchise quarterback in this draft, and drafting a guy first overall won’t change that. I’ve been pretty consistent on this: the Chiefs NEED to upgrade at quarterback during the offseason, but I don’t care how they do it. If they decide their own needs plus a particular quarterback’s ability is worth the first pick, then cool. But if they decide they can get a worthy quarterback later in the draft, or through a trade, then they should do that. But taking a guy first overall won’t make him Andrew Luck or Peyton Manning or even Eli Manning. It might just mean they spent the highest NFL pick in franchise history on a guy they could’ve had in the second round. ------------------------- I'm sorry but I'm not just reading this shit from "National Guys" or whatnot. At this point, there is no consensus. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
|
|