Football The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively DONE - Page 38

ShowtimeSBMVP · 02-24-2013, 04:56 PM

Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora

The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively complete. Can't be finalized til league year begins 3/12

Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora

so it's not official, both clubs view it at as it's effectively done. I do not know the other team. KC and JAX are 2 teams that make sense

RUSH · 02-24-2013, 07:12 PM

It's us. No one else has even been linked to him.

There's too much smoke.

Multiple reports and the guys with sources on here have said the same.

tony77 · 02-24-2013, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandusksuna

Trent Green and Alex Smith aren't even in the same stratosphere.

well to be fair green for the most part sucked before he got to kc.

**The Bad Guy** · 02-24-2013, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess

Smith = Green >>>>>>>> Cassel

I think when compared to the collection of QBs we've had here, it's not a terrible move.

However, the real comparison you have to make is Alex Smith >>> Geno Smith. That's who you are essentially picking between.

Not Alex and Trent Green. Not Alex and Cassel because Cassel is gone regardless.

mnchiefsguy · 02-24-2013, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

ProFootballCentral ‏@PFCentral

Announcement should follow tomorrow. Deal Cant be finalized til league year begins 3/12

So we will know the truth tomorrow hopefully. I pray that it is not KC making the trade.

Brock · 02-24-2013, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony77

What if alex comes here and dose well? It has happened with players throughout history. Not saying he will Im just asking what if?

It's great if getting into the playoffs is enough.

Hammock Parties · 02-24-2013, 07:12 PM

Quit being ****ing children, or worse, women, over this crap.

When the dust settles, we will have a R1QB.

If not, then I'll join the spaz out.

Until then the lot of you should shut the **** up.

-King- · 02-24-2013, 07:13 PM

Since when did it become okay to discuss trades before the start of the new league year?

**The Bad Guy** · 02-24-2013, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

You know what stupid. We only get smith for 1 year at 8.5 million. After next season if we want him again were gonna have to pay even more.

No, he has 2 years left.

O.city · 02-24-2013, 07:13 PM

Looks like we are back to playing lucky roulette with the QB spot. Awesome, thank god I instead spent money on the Cardinals. Atleast they want to win.

**the Talking Can** · 02-24-2013, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

Quit being ****ing children, or worse, women, over this crap.

When the dust settles, we will have a R1QB.

If not, then I'll join the spaz out.

Until then the lot of you should shut the **** up.

no, we won't

and you know that

**BigRedChief** · 02-24-2013, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

It's a shame Chiefs fans are going to be stupid about Alex Smith, too.

I could have seen myself getting into the unruly mob thing. SOC was pretty fun this year. I would have been more than glad to make Alex Smith's stay here in Kansas City as miserable as Matt Cassel's.

But when the majority of the fanbase is in favor of this kind of crap, there's not much left I can do.

We have lived in QB's with no real competition for years and years. Whats wrong with competition?

RINGLEADER · 02-24-2013, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

You know what stupid. We only get smith for 1 year at 8.5 million. After next season if we want him again were gonna have to pay even more.

His salary isn't going to be much more than the Chiefs already had on the books. The Joeckel/Albert move is more about money -- provided their talent level shows itself to be similar. The only way that makes sense is if we pick up other talent with the money that would have otherwise gone to Albert.

All I can think is that the new Chiefs braintrust really hates Geno Smith. Just don't know...

In58men · 02-24-2013, 07:14 PM

Lol with Smith being a Chief our players will be at least 3 years older, when our rookie steps in he'll prolly need about 2-3 years to get it down. We're looking Hali, Charles, Bowe, Flowers, Johnson, etc etc being at least 5-6 years older before we'd be consider Super Bowl contenders.

Our team will be old as ****.

-King- · 02-24-2013, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

PLLLLLEEEEEASE be the Bills! Please God. Pleeeeeeeaaase be the Buffalo Bills.

It just has to be. There's no ****ing way Dorsey and Reid are this stupid. I just refuse to believe.

Hootie · 02-24-2013, 07:14 PM

well I'm going to act under the quick assumption we did trade say a conditional 4th for Smith...

In that scenario and I'm going to assume that means we don't take a QB at #1...I'd like to have the following things happen.

Trade out of #1. We'll have to take less than what the Rams got for #2 last year, no doubt...but maybe trade back to Philly and then trade back again to around 9-13 range and I'll assume Geno will be off the board at this point...

so then I'd like to take someone like Tavon Austin around pick #10. Then I'd like to trade back into the later part of the 1st round...around 22 or so...and take E.J. Manual and let him sit behind Smith like Kaepernick did because I need a QB that is an athlete in today's NFL and I think Manual has that potential. I'd have to look into it further because if he's a dumb **** I don't want a dumb **** at QB...Kaepernick, Wilson, Geno...they are cerebral. Yes, I realize I'm judging him in that regard due to skin color I can admit it. I'm sorry, I'm flawed.

So that gets us Austin and EJ with Alex Smith so far.

Then I want to spend the rest of our picks on 1-2 DB's, 1-2 TE's, 1 WR or RB and then a few BPA's from rounds 5-7.

02-24-2013, 04:56 PM
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $3636009	The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively DONE Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively complete. Can't be finalized til league year begins 3/12 Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora so it's not official, both clubs view it at as it's effectively done. I do not know the other team. KC and JAX are 2 teams that make sense
Posts: 23,753

02-24-2013, 07:12 PM	#556
RUSH Starter Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: NY Casino cash: $10004905	It's us. No one else has even been linked to him. There's too much smoke. Multiple reports and the guys with sources on here have said the same.
Posts: 728

02-24-2013, 07:12 PM	#561
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4690478	Quit being **ing children, or worse, women, over this crap. When the dust settles, we will have a R1QB. If not, then I'll join the spaz out. Until then the lot of you should shut the ** up. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,966

02-24-2013, 07:13 PM	#562
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $2465743	Since when did it become okay to discuss trades before the start of the new league year? __________________ 🏁
Posts: 63,885

02-24-2013, 07:13 PM	#564
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $2724064	Looks like we are back to playing lucky roulette with the QB spot. Awesome, thank god I instead spent money on the Cardinals. Atleast they want to win.
Posts: 81,274

02-24-2013, 07:14 PM	#568
In58men Baba Ganoush Join Date: Jan 2012 Casino cash: $2268026	Lol with Smith being a Chief our players will be at least 3 years older, when our rookie steps in he'll prolly need about 2-3 years to get it down. We're looking Hali, Charles, Bowe, Flowers, Johnson, etc etc being at least 5-6 years older before we'd be consider Super Bowl contenders. Our team will be old as ***. Last edited by In58men; 02-24-2013 at 07:15 PM.. Reason: Jacksonville is smarter than us*
Posts: 29,214

02-24-2013, 07:14 PM	#570
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	well I'm going to act under the quick assumption we did trade say a conditional 4th for Smith... In that scenario and I'm going to assume that means we don't take a QB at #1...I'd like to have the following things happen. Trade out of #1. We'll have to take less than what the Rams got for #2 last year, no doubt...but maybe trade back to Philly and then trade back again to around 9-13 range and I'll assume Geno will be off the board at this point... so then I'd like to take someone like Tavon Austin around pick #10. Then I'd like to trade back into the later part of the 1st round...around 22 or so...and take E.J. Manual and let him sit behind Smith like Kaepernick did because I need a QB that is an athlete in today's NFL and I think Manual has that potential. I'd have to look into it further because if he's a dumb ** I don't want a dumb ** at QB...Kaepernick, Wilson, Geno...they are cerebral. Yes, I realize I'm judging him in that regard due to skin color I can admit it. I'm sorry, I'm flawed. So that gets us Austin and EJ with Alex Smith so far. Then I want to spend the rest of our picks on 1-2 DB's, 1-2 TE's, 1 WR or RB and then a few BPA's from rounds 5-7.
Posts: 56,356