Chiefs If you could sign Marcus Peters tomorrow.. - Page 6

pugsnotdrugs19 · 07:43 PM

to a 5-year $90M contract, would you want the Chiefs to do it?

I bring this up because it is an incredibly tough choice the Chiefs are having to ponder now. The highest paid corner in the league, Josh Norman, makes $15M per year. I am only estimating, but I would bet that extending Peters will take roughly $18M per year.

I think I would actually do it if I was Veach, and here is why. The sooner we can get it out of the way, the better. We're just buying back prime years. If they extend him now for 5 seasons, he will be 30 years old during the last season of the contract, his 9th NFL season.

Despite the occasional on-field antics, this kid has forced 25 turnovers (19 INTs, 6 FFs) in his first three regular seasons (46 games). TWENTY-FIVE. Absolutely incredible. Good for a turnover more than every other game. He's also had 2 INTs in his 4 playoff games.

I thought after the Jets game, when all hell had broke loose, that we should trade him. But, it seems like his teammates love him, so I don't think he is a 'cancer' by any means. Just very competitive.

Thoughts?

**The Bad Guy** · 01-21-2018, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy

No. Guy is an unpredictable nutcase... God only knows how that idiot is going to act once he gets paid millions and millions of dollars. Too risky.

Let him walk. Defense did fine without him against the Raiders. He isn't worth a huge contract.

What a sample size. "Defense did fine without him against the Raiders".

I'm sure you're one of the ones who's mad he doesn't stand, too. You ****ing idiot.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-21-2018, 01:58 PM

It is truly amazing how the people with the worst takes on this board keep that tradition alive.

**Baby Lee** · 01-21-2018, 02:01 PM

jLoy88 · 01-21-2018, 03:07 PM

Sick of giving defensive players long term expensive contracts. Especially one that is already prone to showing lackluster effort in tackling. Look at what it got us with Houston. The guy played his balls out on every play before he got paid. He's a shell of his former effort.

**DaneMcCloud** · 01-21-2018, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jLoy88

Sick of giving defensive players long term expensive contracts. Especially one that is already prone to showing lackluster effort in tackling. Look at what it got us with Houston. The guy played his balls out on every play before he got paid. He's a shell of his former effort.

Butt****ing moron

GloryDayz · 01-21-2018, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Butt****ing moron

Your asshole side is showing again. Everything he said was right, but you're just being emotional.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Sweet Daddy Hate · 01-21-2018, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Servant_KC

I would sign him just to Piss off rhe homer true fans that crave 9-7 and One and done.

That same stupid asshats that cry”it’s too risky!” We must get a RG and move him to left tackle.

Same stupid ****ing asshats that feel we have to trade for proven backups at QB.

Sign him and enjoy the benefits of a top 5 corner.

This. Can't we just "release" these people? Put them on the waiver wire?

"Sorry, brah; we feel you're more suited towards Brown fandom. Besides, they have an exciting, new, game managing QB; just the type you like"!

Quote:

Originally Posted by jLoy88

Sick of giving defensive players long term expensive contracts. Especially one that is already prone to showing lackluster effort in tackling. Look at what it got us with Houston. The guy played his balls out on every play before he got paid. He's a shell of his former effort.

So...no understanding of modern, NFL business practices, then? Got it.

**DaneMcCloud** · 01-21-2018, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

Your asshole side is showing again. Everything he said was right, but you're just being emotional.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

**** off, you hairy ****.

Houston played all 17 games this season and had 9.5 sacks and 46 solo tackles. He'll be even better in 2018, being two years removed from ACL surgery.

He's a butt****ing moron and so are you.

GloryDayz · 01-21-2018, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

**** off, you hairy ****.

Houston played all 17 games this season and had 9.5 sacks and 46 solo tackles. He'll be even better in 2018, being two years removed from ACL surgery.

He's a butt****ing moron and so are you.

Listen here you stupid mother****er, you're dead wrong. The stupid mother****er, like you, is a head case and not worth the bad days.

So go **** yourself. Your attitude is why the Chiefs might make it beyond half a century without a SB appearance.

You live in L.A., a team that's there to **** up.

You shithole.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

**DaneMcCloud** · 01-21-2018, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

Listen here you stupid mother****er, you're dead wrong. The stupid mother****er, like you, is a head case and not worth the bad days.

Yeah, it's smarter to let your superstar players walk than to pay them Market Value.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

So go **** yourself. Your attitude is why the Chiefs might make it beyond half a century without a SB appearance.

Holy shit, you're dumb.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

You shithole.

How can a person be a "shithole"?

ThaVirus · 01-21-2018, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

No. He had a terrible year according to pro football ref AV calcs, falling to a 5 score down from 11 and 13 last two years. This season is a big one for Marcus.

Is that the same source that rated Frank Zombo the same as Justin Houston?

GloryDayz · 01-21-2018, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Yeah, it's smarter to let your superstar players walk than to pay them Market Value.

And we wonder why BB is a perpetual winner and the league office's darling. He's committed to one "superstar", that superstar is in the only place where it really matters to be a superstar in this league, and all the other good players on that team are kept in relative check (or fired).

Quote:

Holy shit, you're dumb.

LOL, go **** yourself!

Quote:

How can a person be a "shithole"?

It's difficult for normal people, but in your case it's a rather amazing transformation.

**DaneMcCloud** · 01-21-2018, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

And we wonder why BB is a perpetual winner and the league office's darling. He's committed to one "superstar", that superstar is in the only place where it really matters to be a superstar in this league, and all the other good players on that team are kept in relative check (or fired).

Oh, good ****ing god.

Bill Belichick is your shining example?

You're a ****ing football novice.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

It's difficult for normal people, but in your case it's a rather amazing transformation.

You're like a monkey, typing words without understanding their meaning.

Stick to DC where idiots appreciate your stupid comments and anger.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 01-21-2018, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz

You live in L.A., a team that's there to **** up.

Wut?

GloryDayz · 01-21-2018, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Oh, good ****ing god.

Bill Belichick is your shining example?

You're a ****ing football novice.

You're like a monkey, typing words without understanding their meaning.

Stick to DC where idiots appreciate your stupid comments and anger.

Yes, that is y example. Is that your triggered reply? Seriously?

Listen here Cali-kid, go back to your bong, your crack pipe, your rolled-up dollar bill, but don't come in here where the Chiefs locals are discussing football. You're not good at it. Among so many things, you suck at football too.

Bring it on you cowardly dipshit.

01-20-2018, 07:12 PM
pugsnotdrugs19 SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS Join Date: Aug 2013 Casino cash: $9119447	If you could sign Marcus Peters tomorrow.. to a 5-year $90M contract, would you want the Chiefs to do it? I bring this up because it is an incredibly tough choice the Chiefs are having to ponder now. The highest paid corner in the league, Josh Norman, makes $15M per year. I am only estimating, but I would bet that extending Peters will take roughly $18M per year. I think I would actually do it if I was Veach, and here is why. The sooner we can get it out of the way, the better. We're just buying back prime years. If they extend him now for 5 seasons, he will be 30 years old during the last season of the contract, his 9th NFL season. Despite the occasional on-field antics, this kid has forced 25 turnovers (19 INTs, 6 FFs) in his first three regular seasons (46 games). TWENTY-FIVE. Absolutely incredible. Good for a turnover more than every other game. He's also had 2 INTs in his 4 playoff games. I thought after the Jets game, when all hell had broke loose, that we should trade him. But, it seems like his teammates love him, so I don't think he is a 'cancer' by any means. Just very competitive. Thoughts? Last edited by pugsnotdrugs19; 01-20-2018 at 07:43 PM..
Posts: 26,377

01-21-2018, 01:58 PM	#77
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9373645	It is truly amazing how the people with the worst takes on this board keep that tradition alive. __________________
Posts: 23,212

01-21-2018, 02:01 PM	#78
Baby Lee Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $6838598
Posts: 95,642

01-21-2018, 03:07 PM	#79
jLoy88 Starter Join Date: Dec 2013 Casino cash: $9977641	Sick of giving defensive players long term expensive contracts. Especially one that is already prone to showing lackluster effort in tackling. Look at what it got us with Houston. The guy played his balls out on every play before he got paid. He's a shell of his former effort.
Posts: 549	1 0