Scientists find cosmic ripples from birth of universe

[Messier]

Never understood why science had to be an either or proposition for the existence of god. I believe in evolution, and god, and never felt conflicted. There will most likely never be proof either way, let believers believe, and unbelievers not.

[WhiteWhale]

Originally Posted by Messier

Never understood why science had to be an either or proposition for the existence of god. I believe in evolution, and god, and never felt conflicted. There will most likely never be proof either way, let believers believe, and unbelievers not.

They don't conflict.

Evolution conflicts with a literal interpretation of the bible, not the idea of god itself.

[Messier]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

They don't conflict.

Evolution conflicts with a literal interpretation of the bible, not the idea of god itself.

The conflict was created by young earth creationists and fundamentalists. They attack science, not the other way around. Science is agnostic.

Science explains the natural world.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

They don't conflict.

Evolution conflicts with a literal interpretation of the bible, not the idea of god itself.

Devils advocate still, not arguing I believe one way or the other. Some people think when you close your eyes for the final time, you either see a light or nothing. I can't speak to which one happens, in my experience the only thing I can control is how many people come to my funeral and if they'll be cheering or crying.

But

The first line of the old testament /Judao-Christian-Muslim bible, "In the beginning, god created the heavens and earth". The OP seems to suggest or prove even, that first sentence took longer to read than the actual creation or beginning, of time and space.

This science is following the bible pretty close. And we're not even including any other religions.