McNabb thinks Cassel can fit in Reid's system

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by Priest31kc

God you're a ****ing dumbass.

Your team has a very good offensive line and you're saying they don't.

Once again, I have no ****ing idea what you were watching this year, but the Chiefs offensive line was one of the better lines in the NFL, especially when Albert was playing.

With Albert back, Hudson returning and a year of experience under Jeff Allen's belt, this line is going to be very very good once again.

Why are you trying to fight this!?

sorry man, your idea of a good OL and mine are not the same. I thought they had a few moments, but not once did the OL put a game together where it was obvious they were getting it done up front.

There are a lot of folks saying Jamaal Charles cant/doesn't run well between the tackles, I am just the opposite -- I have seen him run north/south many times with great success. for example, the game in Denver where he set the single game record as a Chief, one of those TD's was right through that a gap. Countless others too, but not so noted because he did not score from 55 yards out, etc.

To me, an OL preforms well when they play as a unit. The 2010 season, they did and though they were still not a good OL, they at least played well together.

I did not see this OL play well together last season. I have a couple players I like there, but until I see the OL work well as a unit, it doesn't mean anything to me.

Too many penalties at key moments. Albert's game is good, he could have a trip to Hawaii if he'd simply stop committing penalties at those times when it just kills a drive.

To be a good player in this league, or in any football league, you need to make those plays that win games. At 2 - 14, this team obviously did not make plays that win.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

sorry man, your idea of a good OL and mine are not the same. I thought they had a few moments, but not once did the OL put a game together where it was obvious they were getting it done up front.

There are a lot of folks saying Jamaal Charles cant/doesn't run well between the tackles, I am just the opposite -- I have seen him run north/south many times with great success. for example, the game in Denver where he set the single game record as a Chief, one of those TD's was right through that a gap. Countless others too, but not so noted because he did not score from 55 yards out, etc.

To me, an OL preforms well when they play as a unit. The 2010 season, they did and though they were still not a good OL, they at least played well together.

I did not see this OL play well together last season. I have a couple players I like there, but until I see the OL work well as a unit, it doesn't mean anything to me.

Too many penalties at key moments. Albert's game is good, he could have a trip to Hawaii if he'd simply stop committing penalties at those times when it just kills a drive.

To be a good player in this league, or in any football league, you need to make those plays that win games. At 2 - 14, this team obviously did not make plays that win.

What's the solution to this offensive line problem we have?

We've invested too goddamn ****ing much as it is. In the past three drafts we've invested 2 2nd round picks and 2 3rd round picks.

And if we let our LT walk (who you supposedly think isn't good enough) and we draft a guy at #1 overall, that solves our LT "hole" theoretically. Meanwhile, the stuff you're talking about with getting insane push in the running game requires excellent INTERIOR linemen more than anything.

Any solution I can come up with to this "problem" you've put forth seems like a giant ****ing waste of ****ing time.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

sorry man, your idea of a good OL and mine are not the same. I thought they had a few moments, but not once did the OL put a game together where it was obvious they were getting it done up front.

There are a lot of folks saying Jamaal Charles cant/doesn't run well between the tackles, I am just the opposite -- I have seen him run north/south many times with great success. for example, the game in Denver where he set the single game record as a Chief, one of those TD's was right through that a gap. Countless others too, but not so noted because he did not score from 55 yards out, etc.

To me, an OL preforms well when they play as a unit. The 2010 season, they did and though they were still not a good OL, they at least played well together.

I did not see this OL play well together last season. I have a couple players I like there, but until I see the OL work well as a unit, it doesn't mean anything to me.

Too many penalties at key moments. Albert's game is good, he could have a trip to Hawaii if he'd simply stop committing penalties at those times when it just kills a drive.

To be a good player in this league, or in any football league, you need to make those plays that win games. At 2 - 14, this team obviously did not make plays that win.

So again, when they MAGICALLY improve 1000% next year with a NON-SUCKY QB under center, are you gonna eat your crow? Or act like this discussion never happened?

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

Albert's game is good, he could have a trip to Hawaii if he'd simply stop committing penalties at those times when it just kills a drive.
.

HE HAD FIVE PENALTIES ALL YEAR.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

HE HAD FIVE PENALTIES ALL YEAR.

Omaha! Omaha!

[PRIEST]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Omaha! Omaha!

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

HE HAD FIVE PENALTIES ALL YEAR.

you have no sense of context (and maybe no sense at all). 10 games idiot. and (for those of you who have the ability to focus more than a millisecond), it's not so much that he is a penalty machine, it is that he sometimes commits those costly penalties at crucial point during a game.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

you have no sense of context (and maybe no sense at all). 10 games idiot. and (for those of you who have the ability to focus more than a millisecond), it's not so much that he is a penalty machine, it is that he sometimes commits those costly penalties at crucial point during a game.

He only had to deal with the cadence of 2 different SHITTY QBs, a new offensive coordiantor every 8 games, and one of the worst head coaches in the history of football.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

He only had to deal with the cadence of 2 different SHITTY QBs, a new offensive coordiantor every 8 games, and one of the worst head coaches in the history of football.

well that is a good point. but still, do you not notice the bumbling idiots Jamaal has taken the field with, or is it just that one QB you notice.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

well that is a good point. but still, do you not notice the bumbling idiots Jamaal has taken the field with, or is it just that one QB you notice.

Jamaal is one of the most productive RBs OF ALL TIME, behind those "bumbling idiots".

You're not helping your argument.

And I already mentioned TWO QBs, so obviously you can't read.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Jamaal is one of the most productive RBs OF ALL TIME, behind those "bumbling idiots".

You're not helping your argument.

And I already mentioned TWO QBs, so obviously you can't read.

wtf is your point. Jamaal is a player. the rest of this shitfest you root for has been an abismal trainwreck -- meaning they cant even wreck with dignity.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

he sometimes commits those costly penalties at crucial point during a game.

Does he? A quick check of box scores hurls you into the ****ing sun, nimrod.

Albert had a false start against the Saints in the third quarter on a second down. Hardly a crucial point in the game.

He also had a false start against the Saints on a first down in the fourth quarter. with 10 minutes left. Again, hardly crucial. We scored on that drive.

Next penalty is against the Ravens at the start of the second quarter on a third down. We still got the first down. I'll admit that's a slightly crucial penalty.

Then there's one against the Steelers at the start of the third quarter on a first down. Hardly crucial.

Last penalty is on a second down at the start of the 2nd quarter against the Browns. Nope.

So to recap: ONE PENALTY IN THE FOURTH QUARTER. ONLY ONE ON THIRD DOWN.

You're making shit up.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

Does he? A quick check of box scores hurls you into the ****ing sun, nimrod.

Albert had a false start against the Saints in the third quarter on a second down. Hardly a crucial point in the game.

He also had a false start against the Saints on a first down in the fourth quarter. with 10 minutes left. Again, hardly crucial. We scored on that drive.

Next penalty is against the Ravens at the start of the second quarter on a third down. We still got the first down. I'll admit that's a slightly crucial penalty.

Then there's one against the Steelers at the start of the third quarter on a first down. Hardly crucial.

Last penalty is on a second down at the start of the 2nd quarter against the Browns. Nope.

So to recap: ONE PENALTY IN THE FOURTH QUARTER. ONLY ONE ON THIRD DOWN.

You're making shit up.

and how many games did the Chiefs win during the 4th quarter over Albert's career? Here's a hint you ****ing imbecile -- zero.

you and your goddamn stats need to learn more about the game of football. The Chiefs can't get anything going. not in the first qrtr, not in the 2nd, and I'll be goddamned not in crunch time. Lou Zares until further notice. and not from your retarted ass.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

and how many games did the Chiefs win during the 4th quarter over Albert's career? Here's a hint you ****ing imbecile -- zero.

you and your goddamn stats need to learn more about the game of football. The Chiefs can't get anything going. not in the first qrtr, not in the 2nd, and I'll be goddamned not in crunch time. Lou Zares until further notice. and not from your retarted ass.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

and how many games did the Chiefs win during the 4th quarter over Albert's career? Here's a hint you ****ing imbecile -- zero.

Well, you're wrong, again.

So, so wrong.

Shit, that comeback in New Orleans doesn't happen if Albert doesn't play at a high level during CRUCIAL moments in the 4th quarter and overtime.

And then there's all of 2010 and 2011...lots of wins where we won in the 4th quarter.

I mean man, you've been exposed in this thread for being a total doofus.