Football Kubiak: "We need to move on to the next year" - Page 6

carcosa · 12-26-2016, 03:42 PM

Kubiak: "We need to move on to the next year."
— Nicki Jhabvala (@NickiJhabvala) December 26, 2016

Gary Kubiak: Paxton Lynch might start for Broncos vs. Raiders on Sunday https://t.co/cp0pRiO8ts pic.twitter.com/wUnCflopbo
— Around The NFL (@AroundTheNFL) December 26, 2016

Anyone else a little worried that the Broncos are going to mail it in and stick us with the 5 seed?

lcarus · 12-27-2016, 10:45 AM

Denver will still play the game hard. The players and coaches all still have careers. Where the Chiefs or Raiders are seeded in the playoffs probably means **** all to them

carcosa · 12-27-2016, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider

You mean like they came out physical against the Raiders last time they played us? Denver has a lot of injuries up front on that DL, and we'll run the ball right down their throats.

Literally go die, bicth

Opoponax · 12-27-2016, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefGator

I somehow think the Illinois State - Alabama comparison isn't quite valid for Raiders - Broncos.

I was talking about Chiefs-Chargers

**ChiefGator** · 12-27-2016, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Opoponax

I was talking about Chiefs-Chargers

Oh, perhaps a little more applicable, but I wouldn't discount Chargers that quickly. Rivers makes them always dangerous.

lawrenceRaider · 12-27-2016, 11:31 AM

[QUOTE=ARROW2;12644441]

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider

You mean like they came out physical against the Raiders last time they played us? Denver has a lot of injuries up front on that DL, and we'll run the ball right down their throats.[/QUOTE

**** YOU!

If you are your avatar, come on over.

beach tribe · 12-27-2016, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Opoponax

Denver will come out trying to win. They're pros and they have pride. And for a while it'll be close. But as the game wears on and as the Raiders offense begins to pile up yards on the ground, the Donks will become dispirited and look like they did Sunday night.

Any Raider lead of 9 points or greater in the second half is going to look more like 21 points to the Denver offense.

McGloin sure as hell ain't Carr, but the play action will be there all night for him and he'll be able to do enough to keep the run game going.

As for the Chargers, that's an easy Chiefs win. Even if that team really wanted in to win and gave it 100%, they're functioning at about 60% capacity in terms of starting players. Like, say Illinois State was super fired up and the most inspired they've ever been and was playing against Alabama; it wouldn't make jackshit difference. They'd still get walked over like an old piece of juicy fruit on a sidewalk.

The Raiders and Chiefs will both win this Sunday.

Anyone who thinks the Raiders will win needs to pay more attention to the flow of the season.

There is absolutely zero chance they win after what KC did to Denver, and I would be surprised if it's even close.

If the Raiders score 10 points I will be surprised.

TEX · 12-27-2016, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider

You mean like they came out physical against the Raiders last time they played us? Denver has a lot of injuries up front on that DL, and we'll run the ball right down their throats.

I think you're right. Denver is terrible. The only reason why the've won 8 games is because they got off to that 4-0 start. Since then, they are 4 -7. Oakland, even wothout Carr, will beat them easily IMO.

Opoponax · 12-27-2016, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe

Anyone who thinks the Raiders will win needs to pay more attention to the flow of the season.

There is absolutely zero chance they win after what KC did to Denver, and I would be surprised if it's even close.

If the Raiders score 10 points I will be surprised.

"The flow of the season"? What does that mean?

The only "flow" going into the Raiders-Broncos game is that Oakland can still run the ball well and the Donks still can't stop the run. You may wish really, really bad that Oakland's gonna fold up and that the Donk D is going to shut them out, so whatever.

If Oakland scores 13 points it'll probably be enough to win the game.

RippedmyFlesh · 12-27-2016, 11:59 AM

It's been a while since denver has played a game that meant nothing. No one can be sure of how they respond.

Sandy Vagina · 12-27-2016, 12:09 PM

I would guess the Broncs will be angry and competitive. Shame on them, if not.

DEN - 16
OAK - 12

ARROW2 · 12-27-2016, 12:11 PM

[QUOTE=lawrenceRaider;12644641]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2

If you are your avatar, come on over.

OK, good one.....but in the words of Scarface...."YOU STAY AWAY FROM HER, SHE NOT FOR YOU!!!!!"

lcarus · 12-27-2016, 12:15 PM

Potentially going 12-4, sweeping the division, and still getting stuck with a road Wild Card game is a bitter feeling. I've always hoped the NFL would give the team with the better record the home wild card game. No reason an 8-8 team from a terrible division deserves to play at home against a team that's 13-3 and lost their division to a 14-2 team. They can still keep everything else the same.

Sandy Vagina · 12-27-2016, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus

Potentially going 12-4, sweeping the division, and still getting stuck with a road Wild Card game is a bitter feeling. I've always hoped the NFL would give the team with the better record the home wild card game. No reason an 8-8 team from a terrible division deserves to play at home against a team that's 13-3 and lost their division to a 14-2 team. They can still keep everything else the same.

yeah, it's ****ed up..

RippedmyFlesh · 12-27-2016, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks

I would guess the Broncs will be angry and competitive. Shame on them, if not.

DEN - 16
OAK - 12

That is the only way I see denver winning, a low scoring ugly kind of game.

munkey · 12-27-2016, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray

no way they won't play to win.

If not for being a home game I totally agree...No WAY Elway wants to lose at home PERIOD.

12-26-2016, 03:42 PM
carcosa Thank you Join Date: May 2014 Casino cash: $2803695	Kubiak: "We need to move on to the next year" Kubiak: "We need to move on to the next year." — Nicki Jhabvala (@NickiJhabvala) December 26, 2016 Gary Kubiak: Paxton Lynch might start for Broncos vs. Raiders on Sunday https://t.co/cp0pRiO8ts pic.twitter.com/wUnCflopbo — Around The NFL (@AroundTheNFL) December 26, 2016 Anyone else a little worried that the Broncos are going to mail it in and stick us with the 5 seed?
Posts: 22,838

12-27-2016, 10:45 AM	#76
lcarus Everybody Lies. Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: 22 Acacia Avenue Casino cash: $1839928	Denver will still play the game hard. The players and coaches all still have careers. Where the Chiefs or Raiders are seeded in the playoffs probably means **** all to them
Posts: 17,338

12-27-2016, 11:59 AM	#84
RippedmyFlesh Veteran Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: New York Casino cash: $10005817	It's been a while since denver has played a game that meant nothing. No one can be sure of how they respond.
Posts: 4,848

12-27-2016, 12:15 PM	#87
lcarus Everybody Lies. Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: 22 Acacia Avenue Casino cash: $1839928	Potentially going 12-4, sweeping the division, and still getting stuck with a road Wild Card game is a bitter feeling. I've always hoped the NFL would give the team with the better record the home wild card game. No reason an 8-8 team from a terrible division deserves to play at home against a team that's 13-3 and lost their division to a 14-2 team. They can still keep everything else the same.
Posts: 17,338