Football Kubiak: "We need to move on to the next year" - Page 5

carcosa · 12-26-2016, 03:42 PM

Kubiak: "We need to move on to the next year."
— Nicki Jhabvala (@NickiJhabvala) December 26, 2016

Gary Kubiak: Paxton Lynch might start for Broncos vs. Raiders on Sunday https://t.co/cp0pRiO8ts pic.twitter.com/wUnCflopbo
— Around The NFL (@AroundTheNFL) December 26, 2016

Anyone else a little worried that the Broncos are going to mail it in and stick us with the 5 seed?

**TribalElder** · 12-26-2016, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pointer19

Nervous about this happening.

Seems likely

San Diego has to feel like shit after losing to Cleveland

Seriously they just lost to Cleveland

NWTF · 12-26-2016, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink

You would think being defending SB champs but then sub-consciously you are dealing with multi-millionaires who already have a ring knowing they are not going to the playoffs in a d-line facing the biggest strongest running offensive line in the NFL will not be motivatingly fun for them and the fact that Denver has no run game to offset favors McGloin more than Lynch IMHO. Both are young and still learning and it will be whoever has the run game that will win and we know who has the run game.

Besides psychologically Oakland has already defeated Denver which is HUUUUUUUGE !!

Thats it in a nutshell. If Denver stops the run they will win.

TEX · 12-26-2016, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy

Plus Raiders are a division rival. There's going to be trash talking during the game and the Broncos are going to more than likely get pumped up and want to win.

Raiders will have to earn the W just like we did.

The Broncos are terrible. They've lost 7 of 11 and are poorly coached. They cant run and cant stop the run. The Raiders will beat them even without Carr.

**Easy 6** · 12-26-2016, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray

Exactly. They won't go down without a dogfight.

Yeah, I just cant envision a scenario where an NFL team loses on purpose

InChiefsHeaven · 12-26-2016, 09:16 PM

Nobody wants to play a game that they don't want to win. Nobody wants to end the season on a shitty note. If nothing else, they may think of it as winning with Lynch to give him a positive springboard for next season.

But it sucks that we have to depend on the damn Donkeys...and oh yeah, we have to win against a pissed off Chargers team playing their last game in that stadium.

It's gonna be a helluva Sunday.

NWTF · 12-26-2016, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX

The Broncos are terrible. They've lost 7 of 11 and are poorly coached. They cant run and cant stop the run. The Raiders will beat them even without Carr.

Denver can win but they have to stop the run to have a chance. I just dont like Denvers Dline against Oakland oline

Week 9 Rushing Yards OAK 218 DEN 33

**wazu** · 12-26-2016, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InChiefsHell

Nobody wants to play a game that they don't want to win. Nobody wants to end the season on a shitty note. If nothing else, they may think of it as winning with Lynch to give him a positive springboard for next season.

But it sucks that we have to depend on the damn Donkeys...and oh yeah, we have to win against a pissed off Chargers team playing their last game in that stadium.

It's gonna be a helluva Sunday.

We're getting the 5 seed. Embrace it.

**ChiefGator** · 12-27-2016, 08:45 AM

I bet he is telling the players something similar, but it has more the sound of, "We need to move onto evaluating players to determine who will be here next year." i.e., if you want to be here next year, you better start playing better.

scho63 · 12-27-2016, 08:52 AM

Could it be a big ol TRAP?

ARROW2 · 12-27-2016, 09:02 AM

I have been reading the Mane. A bunch of butt hurt, bitch made pussies over there. They would rather sit everybody and give the game to Chokeland to **** us over. **** those punks.

lawrenceRaider · 12-27-2016, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones

KC embarrassed that defense. If you think they won't come out and be physical and pissed off this weekend, you're crazy. They're prideful.

You mean like they came out physical against the Raiders last time they played us? Denver has a lot of injuries up front on that DL, and we'll run the ball right down their throats.

ARROW2 · 12-27-2016, 09:19 AM

[QUOTE=lawrenceRaider;12644434]You mean like they came out physical against the Raiders last time they played us? Denver has a lot of injuries up front on that DL, and we'll run the ball right down their throats.[/QUOTE

**** YOU!

lcarus · 12-27-2016, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2

I have been reading the Mane. A bunch of butt hurt, bitch made pussies over there. They would rather sit everybody and give the game to Chokeland to **** us over. **** those punks.

I imagine if the roles were reversed a lot of people over here would be feeling the same way lol

Opoponax · 12-27-2016, 10:40 AM

Denver will come out trying to win. They're pros and they have pride. And for a while it'll be close. But as the game wears on and as the Raiders offense begins to pile up yards on the ground, the Donks will become dispirited and look like they did Sunday night.

Any Raider lead of 9 points or greater in the second half is going to look more like 21 points to the Denver offense.

McGloin sure as hell ain't Carr, but the play action will be there all night for him and he'll be able to do enough to keep the run game going.

As for the Chargers, that's an easy Chiefs win. Even if that team really wanted to win and gave it 100%, they're functioning at about 60% capacity in terms of starting players. Like, say Illinois State was super fired up and the most inspired they've ever been and was playing against Alabama; it wouldn't make jackshit difference. They'd still get walked over like an old piece of juicy fruit on a sidewalk.

The Raiders and Chiefs will both win this Sunday.

**ChiefGator** · 12-27-2016, 10:42 AM

I somehow think the Illinois State - Alabama comparison isn't quite valid for Raiders - Broncos.

12-26-2016, 03:42 PM
carcosa Thank you Join Date: May 2014 Casino cash: $2803695	Kubiak: "We need to move on to the next year" Kubiak: "We need to move on to the next year." — Nicki Jhabvala (@NickiJhabvala) December 26, 2016 Gary Kubiak: Paxton Lynch might start for Broncos vs. Raiders on Sunday https://t.co/cp0pRiO8ts pic.twitter.com/wUnCflopbo — Around The NFL (@AroundTheNFL) December 26, 2016 Anyone else a little worried that the Broncos are going to mail it in and stick us with the 5 seed?
Posts: 22,838

12-26-2016, 09:16 PM	#65
InChiefsHeaven Rockin' yer FACE OFF! Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Omaha, Nebraska Casino cash: $3854937	Nobody wants to play a game that they don't want to win. Nobody wants to end the season on a shitty note. If nothing else, they may think of it as winning with Lynch to give him a positive springboard for next season. But it sucks that we have to depend on the damn Donkeys...and oh yeah, we have to win against a pissed off Chargers team playing their last game in that stadium. It's gonna be a helluva Sunday. __________________ We have a million reasons for failure, but not one excuse... Die Donks, DIE!! Holy Crap fellas!!! We did it!!! THREE TIMES!!!
Posts: 25,733

12-27-2016, 08:45 AM	#68
ChiefGator Can these boys not play? Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Northcentral Florida Casino cash: $7722956	I bet he is telling the players something similar, but it has more the sound of, "We need to move onto evaluating players to determine who will be here next year." i.e., if you want to be here next year, you better start playing better. __________________ - Mark
Posts: 4,597

12-27-2016, 08:52 AM	#69
scho63 Politically Incorrect Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Scottsdale, AZ Casino cash: $2751110	Could it be a big ol TRAP? __________________ *"The only difference between sex for free and sex for money is that sex for free costs you a WHOLE LOT more!"* ~Redd Foxx~ ~~2018 2019 2020 20212022 2023~~ 2024 Adopt a Chief - Clark Hunt and Brett Veach "The men who drafted Patrick Mahomes"
Posts: 50,523

12-27-2016, 09:02 AM	#70
ARROW2 MVP Join Date: Mar 2002 Casino cash: $9534329	I have been reading the Mane. A bunch of butt hurt, bitch made pussies over there. They would rather sit everybody and give the game to Chokeland to ** us over. ** those punks.
Posts: 5,986

12-27-2016, 09:19 AM	#72
ARROW2 MVP Join Date: Mar 2002 Casino cash: $9534329	[QUOTE=lawrenceRaider;12644434]You mean like they came out physical against the Raiders last time they played us? Denver has a lot of injuries up front on that DL, and we'll run the ball right down their throats.[/QUOTE **** YOU!
Posts: 5,986

12-27-2016, 10:40 AM	#74
Opoponax Starter Join Date: Dec 2016 Casino cash: $10000400	Denver will come out trying to win. They're pros and they have pride. And for a while it'll be close. But as the game wears on and as the Raiders offense begins to pile up yards on the ground, the Donks will become dispirited and look like they did Sunday night. Any Raider lead of 9 points or greater in the second half is going to look more like 21 points to the Denver offense. McGloin sure as hell ain't Carr, but the play action will be there all night for him and he'll be able to do enough to keep the run game going. As for the Chargers, that's an easy Chiefs win. Even if that team really wanted to win and gave it 100%, they're functioning at about 60% capacity in terms of starting players. Like, say Illinois State was super fired up and the most inspired they've ever been and was playing against Alabama; it wouldn't make jackshit difference. They'd still get walked over like an old piece of juicy fruit on a sidewalk. The Raiders and Chiefs will both win this Sunday.
Posts: 37

12-27-2016, 10:42 AM	#75
ChiefGator Can these boys not play? Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Northcentral Florida Casino cash: $7722956	I somehow think the Illinois State - Alabama comparison isn't quite valid for Raiders - Broncos. __________________ - Mark
Posts: 4,597