|
|
View Poll Results: If no QB then who? | |||
LT Luke Joekel | 40 | 31.01% | |
DE Star Lotulelei | 30 | 23.26% | |
LB Jarvis Jones | 19 | 14.73% | |
Other (who, why?) | 40 | 31.01% | |
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-09-2013, 06:06 AM | #1 |
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Like I said earlier, I think we should take the sure thing at 1.1. Be that Joeckel or Milliner, I honestly don't care. There's a need at both spots (assuming Albert is gone. But that's another story). We take our QB at 2.2, where there will still be alot of good players available. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if even Smith were still available. The only QB needy teams in the top 10 all have more pressing needs (Raiders-DL, Eagles-OL, Cards-OL, Bills-LB/WR), and past that, there aren't really any teams that desperately need a QB. The only question mark really is the Jags at 1.2/2.1. Its safer, but it also will probably have the better end result
|
Posts: 19
|
02-09-2013, 06:18 AM | #2 | |
Shaken. Not stirred.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Casino cash: $14020126
VARSITY
|
Quote:
__________________
My dear girl, there are some things that just aren’t done. Such as, drinking Dom Perignon ’53 above the temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s just as bad as listening to the Beatles without earmuffs. |
|
Posts: 65,555
|
02-09-2013, 06:37 AM | #3 | |
Consuming CP souls
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Casino cash: $3818880
|
Quote:
__________________
****Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**** |
|
Posts: 68,737
|
|
|