Senior Bowl Game Thread

**Canofbier** · 01-26-2013, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

Yea I should have worded it different. I meant a first round Chiefs/Jaguars pick. Easily a top 10 pick .

I just don't see how it would be a "bad idea" to take him at 1 if he's worth some other top-10 pick. He's a strong prospect at what is by far our team's largest position of need. Had we won one or two more games by sheer luck, our team would have the exact same needs as it does now, and all of a sudden he would be a good pick?

B14ckmon · 01-26-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canofbier

I just don't see how it would be a "bad idea" to take him at 1 if he's worth some other top-10 pick. He's a strong prospect at what is by far our team's largest position of need. Had we won one or two more games by sheer luck, our team would have the exact same needs as it does now, and all of a sudden he would be a good pick?

No one said it was a bad idea. Chiefs have no choice. It's just unfortunate for the Chiefs IMO.

**Canofbier** · 01-26-2013, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

No one said it was a bad idea. Chiefs have no choice. It's just unfortunate for the Chiefs IMO.

Maybe you didn't say it, but there are media folks and even a significant portion of Chiefs fans who are. I just don't understand it.

B14ckmon · 01-26-2013, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canofbier

Maybe you didn't say it, but there are media folks and even a significant portion of Chiefs fans who are. I just don't understand it.

I have been a Geno fan for two years now. I have every every single game of his last year and the year before. I was raving for the Jaguars to get him at the beginning of the season.

And even I would be terrified about taking him with our #2. I think it's just way too much of a gamble with him. Though the Chiefs definitely have fewer holes to fill on the team so they HAVE to make the pick.