Chiefs Channeling the 2012 version of Alex Smith - Page 8

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 12:18 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9plNqVr2qRo -- definitely the best 8 games played by Smith in his career, stuff we haven't seen on a routine basis

In 8.5 games he threw for 13 TD's , QB rating 102, QBR 68 , 70% completion. Only 26 pass attempts/game yet put up a 6% TD rate (highest as a Chief was 4.5%)

There are 2 clear differences 1) He had great pocket protection and stayed in it more frequently (runs thru progressions routinely) 2) He really trusted options 3-5 to go after the ball (Manningham, Walker, Moss). I think Hill and Conley have built a good amount of trust thus far (but not holding my breath on Harris and Wilson)

Comparing his weapons then and now:
Maclin = Crabtree (push)
T Hill, Conley > Manningham, Moss
Kelce > Davis
Harris << Delanie Walker
Albert Wilson = Kyle Williams (push)
Spencer Ware (4.3 ypc, 3 tds) < Frank Gore (4.7 ypc, 8 tds)
Charcandrick West (3.3 ypc) < Kendall Hunter (5.2 ypc)
Anthony Sherman = Bruce Miller (push)
KC O-Line < San Fran O-line

I think Smith has most of the weapons in place for 2017. If we want bigger plays then we should draft a lineman in round 3 to compete for the center or guard position. We can also look for a versatile RB to be the back-up to Ware cause West is clearly not getting the job done.

#InDorseyWeTrust

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 02-05-2017, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Why? Because you are a hypocrite and I point it out? Or is it because you like to play the victim and I actually read the posts?

Like I said a week ago, I wasn't expecting you to do a fair/unbiased job. You allow shit heads to troll a thread and then you want to only call me out? Not surprising considering your disapproval rating was triple that of other mods being voted in.

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 02-05-2017, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

And also using your donation as leverage to do what you want hasn't ever worked to my knowledge (maybe the guy who owns this place will let me know if it does) so I would leave that out.

Hootie offered a decent chunk every month just to post and it was declined years ago.

How many members on CP use their join date/seniority to control respect or action? Isn't that what was the driving force to replace the previous leadership? Pressure from the mob? So those who contribute to keep the lights on have less say then the trolling freeloaders? Let's not kid ourselves here.

I would be less vocal if there weren't several members PM'ing about how biased a couple of the mods have been since starting the job.

Sandy Vagina · 02-05-2017, 10:55 AM

Is CP ever going to get to a place where it can just... discuss the topics at hand.. instead of obsessing about the forum members?

**SAUTO** · 02-05-2017, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut

Like I said a week ago, I wasn't expecting you to do a fair/unbiased job. You allow shit heads to troll a thread and then you want to only call me out? Not surprising considering your disapproval rating was triple that of other mods being voted in.

I have been VERY fair and unbiased.

Out of the first 80 posts in this thread 26 were you and 17 were off topic. Those are facts.

**SAUTO** · 02-05-2017, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut

How many members on CP use their join date/seniority to control respect or action? Isn't that what was the driving force to replace the previous leadership? Pressure from the mob? So those who contribute to keep the lights on have less say then the trolling freeloaders? Let's not kid ourselves here.

I would be less vocal if there weren't several members PM'ing about how biased a couple of the mods have been since starting the job.

**SAUTO** · 02-05-2017, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks

Is CP ever going to get to a place where it can just... discuss the topics at hand.. instead of obsessing about the forum members?

Yeah, if someone isn't posting 26 times out of 80 with 17 off topic it would be easier.

If he would control himself others would quit, he asks for it with lies and hypocrisy.

**TimBone** · 02-05-2017, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks

Is CP ever going to get to a place where it can just... discuss the topics at hand.. instead of obsessing about the forum members?

The pictures forum stays pretty on topic.

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 02-05-2017, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

I have been VERY fair and unbiased.

Out of the first 80 posts in this thread 26 were you and 17 were off topic. Those are facts.

So you don't want to call out the asshats violating the TOS but you want to call out one person who is being trolled and reminding them of the TOS you are supposed to be enforcing? Nice work, Sauto.This just gives more reason for donors to want to stop giving. I really want to support what Kyle started, a place that allowed decent discussion on Chiefs stuff. But this is becoming pathetic.

You must have missed the graph earlier this week that showed the dramatic decrease in traffic over the last few years...what makes you think the trend will change?

**SAUTO** · 02-05-2017, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut

So you don't want to call out the asshats violating the TOS but you want to call out one person who is being trolled and reminding them of the TOS you are supposed to be enforcing? Nice work, Sauto.This just gives more reason for donors to want to stop giving. I really want to support what Kyle started, a place that allowed decent discussion on Chiefs stuff. But this is becoming pathetic.

You must have missed the graph earlier this week that showed the dramatic decrease in traffic over the last few years...what makes you think the trend will change?

Where had anyone violated the tos? I told you yesterday to report the posts, you haven't. Why? Because you are making drama.

Stop.

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 02-05-2017, 11:14 AM

When I'm in Mexico for 9 days coming up you won't have to deal with me. Rather than giving $50 for the next 6 months with my subscription ending in 2 weeks, I just purchased two floor mats for the car. I'd rather have have my money go towards useful items if shit is what is going to end up being on it.

**SAUTO** · 02-05-2017, 11:14 AM

The main reason for the decline in posts imo is that the team is winning, number one. Number two there are a ton more places to talk chiefs. Number three we got rid of a couple ****ing idiots that did the same thing you do.

If you wouldn't engage then it would be easier to moderate then because there would be no pile ons.

Once again I'm trying to help you here.

If I was being biased I would have banned you and put it th a vote. Win or lose the vote and I still would have won because you would have been banned for a period of time.

But I haven't done that because I would rather you be able to be an actual contributing poster here.

Facts not fiction

**SAUTO** · 02-05-2017, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut

When I'm in Mexico for 9 days coming up you won't have to deal with me. Rather than giving $50 for the next 6 months with my subscription ending in 2 weeks, I just purchased two floor mats for the car. I'd rather have have my money go towards useful items if shit is what is going to end up being on it.

I've donated to this place for years too and have never, never ever, used that as a weapon against someone.

Low class move

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 02-05-2017, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks

Is CP ever going to get to a place where it can just... discuss the topics at hand.. instead of obsessing about the forum members?

Based on how things have going the last 5 years, I wouldn't count on it.

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 02-05-2017, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

The main reason for the decline in posts imo is that the team is winning, number one. Number two there are a ton more places to talk chiefs. Number three we got rid of a couple ****ing idiots that did the same thing you do.

If you wouldn't engage then it would be easier to moderate then because there would be no pile ons.

Once again I'm trying to help you here.

If I was being biased I would have banned you and put it th a vote. Win or lose the vote and I still would have won because you would have been banned for a period of time.

But I haven't done that because I would rather you be able to be an actual contributing poster here.

Facts not fiction

Your use of that phrase to formulate your response to the situation shows your bias. TimBone entertaining the idea that Clay and I will be the first ones to be thrown into the romper room sure isn't bias either. Remind me again why I would want to contribute to this place if things take a dramatic turn from the previous leadership?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

I've donated to this place for years too and have never, never ever, used that as a weapon against someone.

Low class move

Your opinion versus mine.

**SAUTO** · 02-05-2017, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Where had anyone violated the tos? I told you yesterday to report the posts, you haven't. Why? Because you are making drama.

Stop.

You conveniently didn't respond to my question here.

Typical coming from you.

02-04-2017, 12:07 PM
TigeRRUppeRRcut Banned Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: 19th Hole Casino cash: $10004725	Channeling the 2012 version of Alex Smith https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9plNqVr2qRo -- definitely the best 8 games played by Smith in his career, stuff we haven't seen on a routine basis In 8.5 games he threw for 13 TD's , QB rating 102, QBR 68 , 70% completion. Only 26 pass attempts/game yet put up a 6% TD rate (highest as a Chief was 4.5%) There are 2 clear differences 1) He had great pocket protection and stayed in it more frequently (runs thru progressions routinely) 2) He really trusted options 3-5 to go after the ball (Manningham, Walker, Moss). I think Hill and Conley have built a good amount of trust thus far (but not holding my breath on Harris and Wilson) Comparing his weapons then and now: Maclin = Crabtree (push) T Hill, Conley > Manningham, Moss Kelce > Davis Harris << Delanie Walker Albert Wilson = Kyle Williams (push) Spencer Ware (4.3 ypc, 3 tds) < Frank Gore (4.7 ypc, 8 tds) Charcandrick West (3.3 ypc) < Kendall Hunter (5.2 ypc) Anthony Sherman = Bruce Miller (push) KC O-Line < San Fran O-line I think Smith has most of the weapons in place for 2017. If we want bigger plays then we should draft a lineman in round 3 to compete for the center or guard position. We can also look for a versatile RB to be the back-up to Ware cause West is clearly not getting the job done. #InDorseyWeTrust Last edited by TigeRRUppeRRcut; 02-04-2017 at 12:18 PM..
Posts: 11,680

02-05-2017, 11:14 AM	#115
TigeRRUppeRRcut Banned Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: 19th Hole Casino cash: $10004725	When I'm in Mexico for 9 days coming up you won't have to deal with me. Rather than giving $50 for the next 6 months with my subscription ending in 2 weeks, I just purchased two floor mats for the car. I'd rather have have my money go towards useful items if shit is what is going to end up being on it.
Posts: 11,680

02-05-2017, 11:14 AM	#116
SAUTO Shit Join Date: Jun 2008 Casino cash: $10039067	The main reason for the decline in posts imo is that the team is winning, number one. Number two there are a ton more places to talk chiefs. Number three we got rid of a couple ****ing idiots that did the same thing you do. If you wouldn't engage then it would be easier to moderate then because there would be no pile ons. Once again I'm trying to help you here. If I was being biased I would have banned you and put it th a vote. Win or lose the vote and I still would have won because you would have been banned for a period of time. But I haven't done that because I would rather you be able to be an actual contributing poster here. Facts not fiction
Posts: 55,715