Football dez catch - Page 17

Chief_For_Life58 · 01-11-2015, 03:07 PM

That seriously isnt a catch? Yes this needs its own thread

Hootie · 01-12-2015, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

In a sense, they basically penalized Dez for making the athletic play and trying to score (which is ostensibly the goal in football). Silly rule that ruined a great game, drove a dagger into Dallas' season, and will allow the bullshit "Romo as choker" narrative to continue to persist. But that's the NFL.

Well ... I'll give this board a bit of credit for once ... no one called Romo a choker, for once, after the loss.

at least not that I read

JENKINSWINS · 01-12-2015, 11:44 PM

Only fools on CP would think that's a catch, again more evidence that you guys don't know shit about shit.

**RNR** · 01-13-2015, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS

Only fools on CP would think that's a catch, again more evidence that you guys don't know shit about shit.

I have never taken any interest in shit. I also have never encountered an expert on the subject. Please share with everyone how you gained knowledge about shit. It may be more interesting than I originally thought. Do you operate one of those trucks used to clean out portable toilets? Work at a waste water management plant? I am looking forward to learning the shit you know about shit. Thanks in advance~

JENKINSWINS · 01-13-2015, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider

I have never taken any interest in shit. I also have never encountered an expert on the subject. Please share with everyone how you gained knowledge about shit. It may be more interesting than I originally thought. Do you operate one of those trucks used to clean out portable toilets? Work at a waste water management plant? I am looking forward to learning the shit you know about shit. Thanks in advance~

Exactly what I expected. This just proves it even more that you guys are so far behind it's laughable.

Dayze · 01-13-2015, 10:55 AM

it's not a catch based on the rule. which I think is reeruned.
"I" thought it was a catch/should've been, but the rule in place doesn't allow for it.

**RNR** · 01-13-2015, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS

Exactly what I expected. This just proves it even more that you guys are so far behind it's laughable.

Oh so you do not know shit about shit. Dang that is disappointing. Joking aside if you review the posts several stated it was not a catch. Several people also discussed the verbiage of the rule. It is ill-conceived and poorly written in my opinion. You are clearly impressed with yourself. I do find your blanket accusation amusing. It is a feeble attempt to sound intelligent. Unfortunately it makes you appear as an insecure simpleton throwing jabs at the wind~

View Poll Results: catch?
yes	106	47.32%
no	118	52.68%
Voters: 224. You may not vote on this poll

01-11-2015, 03:07 PM
Chief_For_Life58 Veteran Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: KC Casino cash: $9925938	dez catch That seriously isnt a catch? Yes this needs its own thread
Posts: 3,859

01-12-2015, 11:44 PM	#242
JENKINSWINS Veteran Join Date: Aug 2013 Casino cash: $10007948	Only fools on CP would think that's a catch, again more evidence that you guys don't know shit about shit.
Posts: 1,536

01-13-2015, 10:55 AM	#245
Dayze Resident Glue Sniffer Join Date: Nov 2003 Casino cash: $5199358	it's not a catch based on the rule. which I think is reeruned. "I" thought it was a catch/should've been, but the rule in place doesn't allow for it. __________________ Life is 99% inspiration, 1% Perspiration, and 1% Attention to Detial. RIP & Godspeed: Saccoppo Lonewolf Ed Fire Me Boy
Posts: 37,358