Football ***Official College Football week of 10/25 thread***

58-4ever · 10-25-2008, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58-4ever

Yeah, and Rogers is 26 and Bradford is 22. Good argument.

10 pounds over 2 inches in 4 years. That post confirms that you have no perspective. plus Bradford is 6"5. How many balls have been batted down for our team lately?

kstater · 10-25-2008, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58-4ever

10 pounds over 2 inches in 4 years. That post confirms that you have no perspective. plus Bradford is 6"5. How many balls have been batted down for our team lately?

I can almost guarantee you that when the combine rolls around, he'll be 6'3".

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-25-2008, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58-4ever

10 pounds over 2 inches in 4 years. That post confirms that you have no perspective. plus Bradford is 6"5. How many balls have been batted down for our team lately?

Actually, Bradford would have to gain about 15 pounds, and even then he's going to be of a similar build to a QB who was knocked for a lack of size coming out.

Secondly, stop jerking off in the OU media guide. Bradford is not 6'5"

Finally, homer, it still doesn't address the fact that Bradford doesn't have to read a defense in that system, takes no snaps from under center, makes no difficult throws, and lack the arm strength of Aaron Rodgers, who had a good, but not great, arm.

So, other than trying to obfuscate the entire argument about Bradford vs. Stafford into a diversion about the size of Aaron Rodgers, which still doesn't hold up, you're completely ~~right~~ ****ing reeruned.

58-4ever · 10-25-2008, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Actually, Bradford would have to gain about 15 pounds, and even then he's going to be of a similar build to a QB who was knocked for a lack of size coming out.

Secondly, stop jerking off in the OU media guide. Bradford is not 6'5"

Finally, homer, it still doesn't address the fact that Bradford doesn't have to read a defense in that system, takes no snaps from under center, makes no difficult throws, and lack the arm strength of Aaron Rodgers, who had a good, but not great, arm.

So, other than trying to obfuscate the entire argument about Bradford vs. Stafford into a diversion about the size of Aaron Rodgers, which still doesn't hold up, you're completely ~~right~~ ****ing reeruned.

You were the one that brought up Rogers. I think Bradford or Stafford would be good prospects dumbass. and if you've watched any games, he takes tons of snaps under center.

BTW, how many snaps does Brady take under center old school?

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-25-2008, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58-4ever

You were the one that brought up Rogers. I think Bradford or Stafford would be good prospects dumbass. and if you've watched any games, he takes tons of snaps under center.

BTW, how many snaps does Brady take under center old school?

Stupid ****:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=239

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58-4ever

Aaron Rogers has skills Sam Bradford doesn't?

58-4ever · 10-25-2008, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Stupid ****:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=239

convenient you left out the few posts before that

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-25-2008, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58-4ever

convenient you left out the few posts before that

Which, ones, the ones where I didn't mention Aaron Rodgers, which would have been everyone in this thread? Oh I forgot, you bringing Aaron Rodgers into the equation somehow equates to me bringing Aaron Rodgers into the equation through some unknown corollary of tard logic.

58-4ever · 10-25-2008, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Which, ones, the ones where I didn't mention Aaron Rodgers, which would have been everyone in this thread? Oh I forgot, you bringing Aaron Rodgers into the equation somehow equates to me bringing Aaron Rodgers into the equation through some unknown corollary of tard logic.

You are such a drama queen. Now I finally see why half the board hates you. You have no accountability about what you say, and half of what you say isn't even accurate. Good job 'Hamas'.

58-4ever · 10-25-2008, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Actually, Bradford would have to gain about 15 pounds, and even then he's going to be of a similar build to a QB who was knocked for a lack of size coming out.

Secondly, stop jerking off in the OU media guide. Bradford is not 6'5"

Finally, homer, it still doesn't address the fact that Bradford doesn't have to read a defense in that system, takes no snaps from under center, makes no difficult throws, and lack the arm strength of Aaron Rodgers, who had a good, but not great, arm.

So, other than trying to obfuscate the entire argument about Bradford vs. Stafford into a diversion about the size of Aaron Rodgers, which still doesn't hold up, you're completely ~~right~~ ****ing reeruned.

And it was the national media that said bradford was 6"5. whether he is 6"5 or 6"4, what's the f'n difference?