Fire Bob Sutton

[Bl00dyBizkitz]

I'm mad, someone's head has to roll. Get rid of him.

[kcpasco]

You think Sutton just ignored Hilton all game. Or maybe nobody in the secondary could cover him either in man or zone.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by kcpasco

I honestly believe the secondary was sucking so bad it did not matter what scheme was called. I am not trying to defend Sutton but he had jack and shit to work with.

agreed

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by kcpasco

You think Sutton just ignored Hilton all game. Or maybe nobody in the secondary could cover him either in man or zone.

that's why they have this thing called 'double coverage'

if you aren't blitzing (which we weren't) then mix coverages, and double that asshole.

it's not rocket surgery or brain science. ****.

[kcpasco]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

that's why they have this thing called 'double coverage'

if you aren't blitzing (which we weren't) then mix coverages, and double that asshole.

it's not rocket surgery or brain science. ****.

Maybe but I am guessing Luck would have just hit the TE instead in that situation.

[dannybcaitlyn]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

that's why they have this thing called 'double coverage'

if you aren't blitzing (which we weren't) then mix coverages, and double that asshole.

it's not rocket surgery or brain science. ****.

Agreed. He should have been Doubled. Suttton should have learned that from when we played Denver and Decker torched us.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by kcpasco

Maybe but I am guessing Luck would have just hit the TE instead in that situation.

I'll take my chances with Eric Berry on Coby Fleener.

every. ****ing. down.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn

Agreed. He should have been Doubled. Suttton should have learned that from when we played Denver and Decker torched us.

yeah, but that's a bit harder to do - Denver has more receiving weapons than indy does.

[kcpasco]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

I'll take my chances with Eric Berry on Coby Fleener.

every. ****ing. down.

Ordinarily I would say yes. But Berry was having a horrible game himself. I have never seen him miss so many tackles.

[dannybcaitlyn]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

yeah, but that's a bit harder to do - Denver has more receiving weapons than indy does.

True, but you have enough people to do it when your only bringing in four lineman.

[Stalker]

Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz

Oh, another thing.

HOW BOUT THAT TACKLING?

Even Berry missed a tackle

[dannybcaitlyn]

Originally Posted by kcpasco

Ordinarily I would say yes. But Berry was having a horrible game himself. I have never seen him miss so many tackles.

Fleener wasn't beating us on Deep passes. At least it would have made them use up the clock if all they had to do is dink and dunk. Hilton was beating us deep and in chunks.

[SeeingRed]

The back ups played better against San Diego actually...much better

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn

Fleener wasn't beating us on Deep passes. At least it would have made them use up the clock if all they had to do is dink and dunk. Hilton was beating us deep and in chunks.

this.

and I have to believe that Berry eventually figures Luck/Fleener out, makes a read, breaks on the ball and picks it off.

[dannybcaitlyn]

Did Catapano go back in the game? They pulled him after his penalty.

[SeeingRed]

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn

Did Catapano go back in the game? They pulled him after his penalty.

Nope...for a play or two only. Didnt get that either. All I know is we had no pass rush and no secondary from midway through the 3rd quarter on