The NFL doesn't think Mahomes is a first rounder. - Page 2

**BossChief** · 04-14-2017, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

I still think that the Browns should roll with Osweiler this year. Take Garrett at 1 and take Trubisky at 12 if you want to but don't start him Week 1. Let Osweiler take those shots and get Trubisky learning your offense.

If the Browns use their picks wisely, they stack that teams defense and waits on a QB. Let the defense grow together and just punt this year and draft the top guy next year.

They will for sure have a top 5 pick, likely first overall...stack the defense and draft a stud next year.

Otherwise, they are going to go into a self defeating pattern again and draft a halfway talented project this year and might use that as an excuse to pass on an elite prospect at the position.

**BossChief** · 04-14-2017, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11

The only people who believe Mahomes is a first rounder are desperate fans.

You're just playing contrarian, as usual.

This is extremely similar to when GB had an aging starter and chose a project with a huge upside that was a project in the late first round.

Or when GB traded for a gunslinger that Atlanta drafted the year before in the early second round...for Andy Reid to help develop into a HOFer.

-King- · 04-14-2017, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

You're just playing contrarian, as usual.

This is extremely similar to when GB had an aging starter and chose a project with a huge upside that was a project in the late first round.

Or when GB traded for a gunslinger that Atlanta drafted the year before in the early second round...for Andy Reid to help develop into a HOFer.

No. No it's not.
Posted via Mobile Device

Hammock Parties · 04-14-2017, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

You're just playing contrarian, as usual.

This is extremely similar to when GB had an aging starter and chose a project with a huge upside that was a project in the late first round.

Or when GB traded for a gunslinger that Atlanta drafted the year before in the early second round...for Andy Reid to help develop into a HOFer.

Now Rodgers was a project?

Dude he was considered to be an awesome prospect and people were just mystified when he started to drop. Not remotely the same.

Terrible, awful comparison.

kccrow · 04-14-2017, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11

Now Rodgers was a project?

Dude he was considered to be an awesome prospect and people were just mystified when he started to drop. Not remotely the same.

Terrible, awful comparison.

I never recall Rodgers being an "awesome prospect."

--------

As for Mahomes not getting invited, big shit. He's still more likely than not to go 1st round. Kizer on the other hand, I don't think he's going 1st round and he got invited. Kind of strange.

In my opinion, I think it's too much of a production anyhow. I think you invite, at most, the 10 guys you think will go top 15 and leave it at that. There's 22 guys invited this year to attend, which is absolutely ridiculous.

Hammock Parties · 04-14-2017, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow

I never recall Rodgers being an "awesome prospect."

He wasn't a Manning but he certainly wasn't goddamn Pat Mahomes.

**jjchieffan** · 04-16-2017, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11

The only people who believe Mahomes is a first rounder are desperate fans.

There it is folks. Iron clad proof that Mahomes is going in the first. Shoot, if Claynus is stating it as fact that he's not first round talent, then we may just be looking at a future hall of famer.

OldSchool · 04-16-2017, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

There it is folks. Iron clad proof that Mahomes is going in the first. Shoot, if Claynus is stating it as fact that he's not first round talent, then we may just be looking at a future hall of famer.

The funny thing is that a bunch of people on here thought that Geno Smith would have been a worthy #1 overall pick.

Those same people are hyping up these mediocre QB prospects as 1st round talents.

The cycle continues at CP.

**BossChief** · 04-16-2017, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool

The funny thing is that a bunch of people on here thought that Geno Smith would have been a worthy #1 overall pick.

Those same people are hyping up these mediocre QB prospects as 1st round talents.

The cycle continues at CP.

Every one of us that wanted to draft Geno, wanted him to sit for 1 year minimum and I wanted 2 years.

Everybody agreed that he wasn't ready to go right away...but NY is dumb and pushed the kid on the field too early when he wasn't ready.

kccrow · 04-16-2017, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool

The funny thing is that a bunch of people on here thought that Geno Smith would have been a worthy #1 overall pick.

Those same people are hyping up these mediocre QB prospects as 1st round talents.

The cycle continues at CP.

Never did like Geno Smith.

Only QB I'm hyping is Mahomes. I have some issues with Watson. I kind of like Trubisky.

I'm not sure it's "pimping" when you know damn well at least 3 of these guys are going round 1, and it is entirely possible 4 or 5 go.

**RealSNR** · 09-19-2018, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool

The funny thing is that a bunch of people on here thought that Geno Smith would have been a worthy #1 overall pick.

Those same people are hyping up these mediocre QB prospects as 1st round talents.

The cycle continues at CP.

Another example.

From the dipshit who brought you the phrase, "I just don't think any of the QBs in this draft class are Andrew Luck" and says it every ****ing year.

There probably isn't an Andrew Luck in the 2019 class, either. OldSchool doesn't have opinions on college QB prospects. Why have one of those when you can just assume they'll all bust except for any Andrew Lucks that come around once in awhile? You'll be correct most of the time! Makes total pussy sense to me!