|
|
View Poll Results: Compare and contrast the QB history of these teams. | |||
*** Part 1 - Which team has a better 50-year history at the QB position? | 0 | 0% | |
Giants | 18 | 90.00% | |
Jets | 1 | 5.00% | |
*** Part 2 - How would you rate the Giants' quarterback history? | 0 | 0% | |
Very strong | 3 | 15.00% | |
Somewhat strong | 13 | 65.00% | |
About average | 4 | 20.00% | |
Somewhat weak | 0 | 0% | |
Very weak | 0 | 0% | |
*** Part 3 - How would you rate the Jets' quarterback history? | 0 | 0% | |
Very strong | 1 | 5.00% | |
Somewhat strong | 0 | 0% | |
About average | 6 | 30.00% | |
Somewhat weak | 11 | 55.00% | |
Very weak | 1 | 5.00% | |
I don't see quarterbacks being very relevant in New York. | 1 | 5.00% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-11-2016, 06:46 PM | #2 |
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $3208491
VARSITY
|
The Giants have had stability at the QB position, which surprised me to see. I've never thought of them as a team with much talent at QB. Tarkenton was top-notch, and Simms and Manning have been good enough to win with. I guess I would rate this team as somewhat strong.
The Jets have kind of been a mess. Namath was around for a while, but other than an occasional good year by a passing hobo they've been pretty bad. I would rate them as somewhat weak, and maybe they're very weak. However, producing 10 pro bowls isn't horrible.
__________________
I'm putting random letters here as a celebration of free speech: xigrakgrah misorojeq rkemeseit. |
Posts: 141,543
|
06-11-2016, 07:05 PM | #3 |
Bolton gonna knock you out
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Free Vybz Kartel
Casino cash: $2602394
|
Giants are much better. Jets VaGeno Smith, nuff said!
|
Posts: 20,456
|
06-11-2016, 08:27 PM | #4 |
Unsparing
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $10004900
|
It's a Sanchize world, we are just fortunate to live freely in it.
|
Posts: 77,135
|
|
|