|
11-16-2017, 04:32 PM | #16 |
Tre Right, Three Jet Chip Wasp
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Land of the Tech Bro
Casino cash: $5192474
|
I work in tech and we do it all the time. People leave for a different company and come back in a couple of years. We had one person start back with us, that quit 2 years ago to work closer to home, this past Monday. Better pay and better position. Its one of the only ways to get ahead and get paid up to market in this industry. Unless you're a genius or your daddy/husband is rich then you can be a ****tard asshole thats worthless and get positions well beyond your scope of knowledge and skills (janitor) over people much more qualified and able. But thats another story.
|
Posts: 3,723
|
11-16-2017, 04:33 PM | #17 | |
Sarcasm
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Olathe
Casino cash: $4792900
|
Quote:
2. No 3. It hasn't been an easy replacement 4. More appreciative of the job, from the sounds of it absolutely 5. Left on good terms, but during the final 2 weeks they slacked a bit |
|
Posts: 21,133
|
11-16-2017, 04:33 PM | #18 |
21st Century Schizoid Fan
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Gates of Delirium
Casino cash: $2564950
|
That was me 24 years ago. Left my paper for supposedly greener pastures, wound up hating it, 18 months later I was rehired at my former paper, in a different position (switched from sportswriting to editorial writing). Worked there another 13 years before leaving on good terms (and good thing I did -- they eliminated my position about 2 years later).
|
Posts: 69,149
|
11-16-2017, 04:35 PM | #19 |
Has a particular set of skills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the water
Casino cash: $3159627
VARSITY
|
Sure. People leave on good terms for perceived greeener pastures.
__________________
Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering. -YODA |
Posts: 79,001
|
11-16-2017, 04:35 PM | #20 |
Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Utopia
Casino cash: $4778454
|
In that circumstance for me, the employee comes back with their hat in their hand, appreciating the position they had with you and will probably be a better, loyal trooper.
|
Posts: 61,525
|
11-16-2017, 04:36 PM | #21 |
Sarcasm
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Olathe
Casino cash: $4792900
|
|
Posts: 21,133
|
11-16-2017, 04:38 PM | #22 |
Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Utopia
Casino cash: $4778454
|
If there is an open position, I guess I don't see any issue.
you already know them, how they fit in your environment. You already know if they're dependable, how hard they work, if they're a team player, if they meet deadlines. In my experience when someone leaves you know pretty quickly if you'd want them back or not based on what you find when they're gone and if they were hard to replace. Sometimes the replacements are improvements...sometimes they make you appreciate the other guy. |
Posts: 61,525
|
11-16-2017, 04:40 PM | #23 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $6438777
|
|
Posts: 2,443
|
11-16-2017, 04:43 PM | #24 |
Kind of a mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Donkey Land
Casino cash: $2046899
|
Think of it this way:
Would you rather hire this person again with the possibility that they might leave again soon, or would you rather go through a normal hiring process to find someone else to fill the role? |
Posts: 51,755
|
11-16-2017, 04:46 PM | #25 |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2298919
|
I don't see anything wrong with that then. With the expectation that they'll be treated as a new employee.
__________________
|
Posts: 47,490
|
11-16-2017, 04:47 PM | #26 |
Sarcasm
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Olathe
Casino cash: $4792900
|
Well if they did leave again shortly thereafter, I'd have to go through the hiring process regardless whether it's now or later. But I'd rather take the chance on someone who knows what they're doing right away.
|
Posts: 21,133
|
11-16-2017, 05:04 PM | #27 |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
i have and found out nothing changed and fired their ass all over again.
|
Posts: 55,715
|
11-16-2017, 05:10 PM | #28 |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Casino cash: $9976352
|
If the process of on-boarding isn't painful (thinking about having to go back through the process should they leave again), I would give them another go. If they're good a employee, it's worth the risk.
If you're a big company, you might see about helping with career investment. |
Posts: 1,163
|
11-16-2017, 05:29 PM | #29 |
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $3338491
VARSITY
|
You rehired someone that you fired? I think I see the problem.
__________________
I'm putting random letters here as a celebration of free speech: xigrakgrah misorojeq rkemeseit. |
Posts: 141,338
|
1 0 |
11-16-2017, 05:33 PM | #30 |
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $3338491
VARSITY
|
If I think about all of my ex-employees, I'd probably hire about 20 percent of them back.
Among the other 80 percent, I'd divvy it up as ... 25 percent were good employees, but the company has evolved and their skills or their position are no longer needed. I'd never really thought about this before, but it's a big factor. 15 percent were fine workers but with limited upside in the company for various reasons. 30 percent weren't a great fit and it was better for both of us when they moved on. 10 percent were never a good fit and I had to terminate them, which I don't enjoy doing.
__________________
I'm putting random letters here as a celebration of free speech: xigrakgrah misorojeq rkemeseit. Last edited by Rain Man; 11-16-2017 at 06:26 PM.. |
Posts: 141,338
|
|
|