|
|
View Poll Results: Does our arrival in the Mahomes era affect your interest in Chiefs history? | |||
I’m less interested in the Chiefs’ history, because the future is forward. | 25 | 35.71% | |
I’m more interested in the Chiefs’ history, because it makes me appreciate where we’re at more. | 22 | 31.43% | |
The Mahomes era is not impacting my interest in Chiefs history, because I compartmentalize my emotions. | 16 | 22.86% | |
I don’t really follow the Chiefs. I’m just here for the ice cream and off-topic discussions. | 0 | 0% | |
I still think we should change the team name to Ermines. | 2 | 2.86% | |
Per the Fifth Amendment, I am not required to share this information with you. | 5 | 7.14% | |
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-03-2018, 05:36 PM | Topic Starter |
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $3288491
VARSITY
|
Is anyone else now uninterested in the Chiefs' past?
As I bask in the sunshine of the Mahomes era, I find myself far less interested in the past. I don't care about past playoff losses, I don't fret about past quarterbacks, and Herman Edwards can talk about whatever he wants. The current Chiefs have no relation to the past, and I find myself living in the present and looking forward to the future. I like this new life of mine.
I realize now that nearly every playoff game in my memory has been mid-level teams squabbling for table scraps. We lost to the Colts? Who cares? Neither team was going anywhere anyway. I have released my anger. Matt Cassel? Who cares? It's the past. He's gone. We have a franchise quarterback. Does anyone else feel the same way? |
Posts: 141,458
|
|
|