Ryan Tannehill

[jspchief]

I'll be closely watching him through the rest of the NCAA season. I expect him to end up a 1st round prospect, and more likely to be available in the range where KC will be picking.

He seems to have good pocket presence, throws well on the move, has a live arm, and plays smart. He's looking good. I'm not sure he's the QB I'm championing just yet, but he's on my radar and has already passed the likes of Foles and and Jones in my book.

Curious to hear what others think of him. Who's seen a lot of him? What are his downsides IYO?

Discuss.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

Iowa hasn't beaten Nebraska since I've been alive. What's that have to do with anything though? Palko played better in the preseason than Stanzi it's the truth. Ricky Stanzi is nothing more than Curtis Painter it's so annoying coming on here constantly hearing about his mediocre ass. He wasn't even a great college QB.

I asked you if Stanzi would have shit himself as thoroughly as Palko has done since starting and you said no.

So how is it that Palko is better than Stanzi again?

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by SNR

I asked you if Stanzi would have shit himself as thoroughly as Palko has done since starting and you said no.

So how is it that Palko is better than Stanzi again?

I don't think I've stated anywhere that Palko is better than Stanzi other than this preseason. I think Stanzi could be a backup someday while Palko won't be in the NFL. I'm not sure why one little comment turned into such a huge debate in a thread about Ryan Tannehill.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by milkman

You're the only dumbass arguing that Palko played better than Stanzi in the preseason.

Anyone with eyes saw that your "truth" is absolute bullshit.

And, again, I'm not arguing that Stanzi is the future.

I am only arguing that you are a ****ing moron.

Yeah the only one nevermind the Chiefs made him the backup.


You still haven't been able to backup your argument. I made a clear case with factual evidence. You might want to go over to LibertForest they like the Conspiracy type over there.

How the **** could you remember who played better when you a number of times mistated things in the preseason to make your argument look better?

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

I don't think I've stated anywhere that Palko is better than Stanzi other than this preseason. I think Stanzi could be a backup someday while Palko won't be in the NFL. I'm not sure why one little comment turned into such a huge debate in a thread about Ryan Tannehill.

Uhp. I got ahead of myself. You did specify preseason. Sorry about that.

I still think you're underselling Stanzi's play and overselling Palko's play from preseason. Again, Palko had actual STARTERS on the offensive line when he was in the game. Stanzi had some in the game against the Rams, true, but he also played better than Palko in that game (stats support my case on this one). It comes down to the Baltimore game when Palko had a good few seconds of time to actually set his feet after taking his drop from the snap and then make a decision. I think you're forgetting how ****ing awful of a situation Stanzi had when he was playing.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by SNR

Uhp. I got ahead of myself. You did specify preseason. Sorry about that.

I still think you're underselling Stanzi's play and overselling Palko's play from preseason. Again, Palko had actual STARTERS on the offensive line when he was in the game. Stanzi had some in the game against the Rams, true, but he also played better than Palko in that game (stats support my case on this one). It comes down to the Baltimore game when Palko had a good few seconds of time to actually set his feet after taking his drop from the snap and then make a decision. I think you're forgetting how ****ing awful of a situation Stanzi had when he was playing.

I'm not denying Stanzi was put into some tough spots but I also think Palko was as well. I remember Cassel looking like complete shit then Palko got sometime with the starters and outperformed Cassel. Either way I wasn't comfortable going into the season with Stanzi or Palko as the backup I think that was a joke. Stanzi did look good against the Rams and did some other good things as well. I think he was a work in progress though as I recall he missed some guys deep a few times but yes I do think Palko played better in the preseason. No, I don't think Palko will be a better QB when it's all said and done. Yes, I think Ricky Stanzi should get a look as a starter here the last few games.

[jspchief]

Don't know if Tannehill will go in the first or not. I could see his stock climbing after the combine.

Maybe we move down in the 1st or up in the 2nd to get him, where I'm guessing he could go.

Personally I'd prefer him over Laundry or Foles.

[crossbow]

He realy should go in the top of the 2nd round but there are a lot of teams that want to upgrade the QB postition this year so the Chiefs may have to spend a 1st on him. It would look like a reach but he has the tools to work with. I would be pleased to get him on the team. We know he can play receiver can he play right tackle too? That would be a big plus .

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

Yeah the only one nevermind the Chiefs made him the backup.


You still haven't been able to backup your argument. I made a clear case with factual evidence. You might want to go over to LibertForest they like the Conspiracy type over there.

How the **** could you remember who played better when you a number of times mistated things in the preseason to make your argument look better?

I gave factual evidence with the stats from the Rams game.

And where did mistate anything?

And at the end of the day, I have also said over and over again, stats mean jack to me.

I believe what my eyes tell me, and eyes tell me that Stanzi played better when given the same the same kind of opportunity that Palko received.

He played better with the second team than Palko did, and he played better in that situation that Plako did when he played with the first team.

My eyes also tell me that you are a ****ing idiot.

[milkman]

And, ftr, Stanzi outplayed Plako by a ****ing mile in that Rams game, driving the Chiefs to their only TD in that game, and he made passes in every game he played in that neither Cassel or Palko can ever dream of making.

[Chiefnj2]

In known passing situations (3rd and long and when trailing by 8 or more points in a game) Tannehill's completion % was a lot lower than Foles and lower than Cousins.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

In known passing situations (3rd and long and when trailing by 8 or more points in a game) Tannehill's completion % was a lot lower than Foles and lower than Cousins.

Cousins is also a lucky ****ing son of a whore.

[Coogs]

You guys are really sluffing off on the job! Tannehill's gal...

http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2011...budding-model/

[Tribal Warfare]

I'd take him, they kid was nails in the K-State game.

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

I'm not denying Stanzi was put into some tough spots but I also think Palko was as well. I remember Cassel looking like complete shit then Palko got sometime with the starters and outperformed Cassel. Either way I wasn't comfortable going into the season with Stanzi or Palko as the backup I think that was a joke. Stanzi did look good against the Rams and did some other good things as well. I think he was a work in progress though as I recall he missed some guys deep a few times but yes I do think Palko played better in the preseason. No, I don't think Palko will be a better QB when it's all said and done. Yes, I think Ricky Stanzi should get a look as a starter here the last few games.

I remember two deep balls off the top of my head. One, fell PERFECTLY in the bread basket of the receiver, in stride, and the idiot dropped it. Might have been Horne or another one of the phuqtards this team keeps around at WR.

The other, was a TD to Cody Slate.

Overall, their stats for the preseason were really similar. Palko had the benefit of playing with the first and second teams though. Whereas Stanzi got to play behind a terrible OL with terrible receivers. The amount of quality passing outright dropped by the receivers was pretty bad considering he only threw 34 passes total...

[Mr_Tomahawk]

Just a reminder for those who haven't seen him play much this year...