NFL Draft 2013 First Round Draft Order - Page 4

Mr. Laz · 02:40 PM

UPDATED WEEKLY 2013 FIRST-ROUND SELECTION ORDER

GBN PRE-SEASON DRAFT GUIDE

The 11th edition of the annual Geat Blue North Fall Draft Guide with profiles of over 200 of the top prospects for the 2013 draft is now available. And in getting with the times - not to mention making the whole thing economically feasible what with rising printing and postage costs - this year’s edition is being delivered electronically.

Order your copy here.

October 9, 2012

P Indicates final seletion position TBD by playoff results
F indicates poisition(s) TBD by coin flip

* Note that the opponent's cumulative W-L record is based on each team's full 16-game schedule and no just on the games they have played to date.

	Team	W-L	Opp W-L %
1	Cleveland	0-5	.520
2	Kansas City	1-4	.440
3	New Orleans	1-4	.487
4	Carolina	1-4	.500
5	Jacksonville	1-4	.526
6	Tennessee	1-4	.539
7	Oakland	1-3	.410
8	Tampa Bay	1-3	.487
9	Detroit	1-3	.646
10	Denver	2-3	.447
11	Buffalo	2-3	.481
12	St. Louis (from Washington)	2-3	.526
13	Miami	2-3	.526
14	NY Jets	2-3	.538
15	Green Bay	2-3	.584
16	Indianapolis	2-2	.443
17	Dallas	2-2	.513
18	NY Giants	3-2	.487
19	Seattle	3-2	577
20	St. Louis	3-2	.577
21P	Pittsburgh	2-2	.436
22P	San Diego	3-2	.382
23P	Cincinnati	3-2	.421
24P	Philadelphia	3-2	.480
25P	New England	3-2	.519
26P	Baltimore	4-1	.461
27P	Chicago	4-1	.526
28P	Minnesota	4-1	.526
29P	San Francisco	4-1	.557
30P	Arizona	4-1	.608
31P	Atlanta	5-0	.373
32P	Houston	5-0	.442

If you have comments or suggestions, e-mail: The editor. The GBN can also be reached by phone at (613) 692-1088; or regular mail at 320 Shadehill Cres., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; K2J 0L6.
Great Blue North Draft Report Privacy Policy.
The GREAT BLUE NORTH DRAFT REPORT is a division of SQUITERLAND ENTERPRISES, Ottawa, Ontario,Canada

Micjones · 10-10-2012, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

If they do the same shit in TB that they did against the Ravens......I'll root for them to lose every game for the rest of the season.

God that shit was maddening.
One play away from taking a lead and we still couldn't get there.
I still can't believe we had two TD's taken away.

Otter · 10-10-2012, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke

I don't think anyone roots for losses. You see the same guys saying "suck for luck" all last year bitching about the games etc... No one wants to see the team lose. But we want to see improvement... and right now, the only way we see improvement is with a QB we can all get behind. Those don't exactly grow on trees. I'm like many fans here.. I am torn. I want to win.. I hate losing... but at the same time... I want change. I don't want to sit at 7-9... 8-8, 9-7 for eternity, which is the path this team is on, currently.

I beg to differ. Put me down for losses.

Fall back and regroup as opposed to trying to be high heels and makeup on the fat chick and calling her a bombshell.

Do it. Colts have Luck because of falling back and saying "ya know what, this isn't working".

Fansy the Famous Bard · 10-10-2012, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter

I beg to differ. Put me down for losses.

Fall back and regroup as opposed to trying to be high heels and makeup on the fat chick and calling her a bombshell.

Do it. Colts have Luck because of falling back and saying "ya know what, this isn't working".

I should have said, "i don't think anyone likes to see the team lose:... some people have differing values, obviously.

**Old Dog** · 10-10-2012, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life

Im I the only one worried about us going to TB and pulling out a win?

I was, but then I called my guy and put $100 on the money line for the Chiefs.....this means a loss is a near certainty.

**Renegade** · 10-10-2012, 01:51 PM

I don't understand how this has us picking #2. I would think that NO would own the tiebreaker as we beat them head to head. I see us at #3 right now.

**Old Dog** · 10-10-2012, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Renegade

I don't understand how this has us picking #2. I would think that NO would own the tiebreaker as we beat them head to head. I see us at #3 right now.

Head to head has no bearing in regard to draft order.
Tiebreaker is strength of schedule

KevB · 10-10-2012, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Renegade

I don't understand how this has us picking #2. I would think that NO would own the tiebreaker as we beat them head to head. I see us at #3 right now.

Strength of Schedule is the first tie breaker; head to head doesn't factor in at all.

**the Talking Can** · 10-10-2012, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69

Great, another suck for whoever season. I don't understand the thinking of watching your favorite team out there and rooting for them to lose. If they end up stinking up the joint and get there, I'll live with it. I would be more pissed off if they trot out Matt Cassel again then if we lose the top pick. You don't root for losses.

if you give a shit about this team ever being good, you root for them to go 1-15...

the position of QB is like the #1 pick in the NBA draft...it is far and away the best way to change your franchise and you achieve it by sucking ass completely...

short term pain for long term gain

or, you can root for year #32 of 7-9.....yay

suds79 · 10-10-2012, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

Leaf to Brees you mean?

Yeah I suppose so.

Wasn't trying to say Rivers came right after Leaf but more to that they didn't shy away from using another 1st on a QB a few years down the road.

But yes you're correct. Drew Brees is just another example. 1st pick in the 2nd.

They got it right in that they kept investing in that position until they found a winner.

**the Talking Can** · 10-10-2012, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79

Yeah I suppose so.

Wasn't trying to say Rivers came right after Leaf but more to that they didn't shy away from using another 1st on a QB a few years down the road.

But yes you're correct. Drew Brees is just another example. 1st pick in the 2nd.

They got it right in that they kept investing in that position until they found a winner.

Vick to Ryan
Boller to Flacco

**RealSNR** · 10-10-2012, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69

Great, another suck for whoever season. I don't understand the thinking of watching your favorite team out there and rooting for them to lose. If they end up stinking up the joint and get there, I'll live with it. I would be more pissed off if they trot out Matt Cassel again then if we lose the top pick. You don't root for losses.

I'd rather do a 1-15 season than live eternally in 7-9 purgatory for the rest of my life.

It looks like the Chiefs are closer to that 1-15 thing than they are the playoffs. They're also stuck in the mire and desperately need a franchise QB to break the cycle. If they had that QB (like St. Louis has Bradford, for example) I wouldn't want to see them tank the season either, but there is no other way out. Manti Teo or some dick-faced OT or DE isn't going to solve this team's ****ing problems next year.

Micjones · 10-10-2012, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79

Yeah I suppose so.

Wasn't trying to say Rivers came right after Leaf but more to that they didn't shy away from using another 1st on a QB a few years down the road.

But yes you're correct. Drew Brees is just another example. 1st pick in the 2nd.

They got it right in that they kept investing in that position until they found a winner.

We should definitely get in that habit. Starting in 2013.
Gone are the days where teams win important games in spite of their QB.

Chief Roundup · 10-10-2012, 02:25 PM

I would rather this team have a 10-6 season and be willing to trade up in the draft to get a QB. But I think we all know that is not going to happen. So I hope we lose enough to be able to get one of the top guys.
I know this won't be popular but if we end up with the 1st overall pick and could turn that pick into Wilson along with several other top picks, whatever combination of 1st and 2cd rounders, over the next couple of years I would have to trade the pick.

Jiu Jitsu Jon · 10-10-2012, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

yes, i think it was last year's 1st that they traded to Cincy.

Yes, Raiders have their 1st this year. I really doubt they pick up a QB in the first round. I see them getting the first overall pick and trading down to get more picks.

We'll also give you guys a 7th round pick and a Jimmy John's gift certificate if you'll pick up Rolondo McClain's contract. Italian Night Club is the bomb, yo.

**alnorth** · 10-10-2012, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

I want this team to trade for the #1 pick, no matter where they are in the draft. I don't care if we're at #2.

"We're not trading down, sorry, we're picking Geno. No, I don't care if you are offering 4 #1's, we're not trading for any price, g'bye"

10-10-2012, 01:51 PM	#50
Renegade Just Lurking Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Ozark Mountain Country Casino cash: $1777904	I don't understand how this has us picking #2. I would think that NO would own the tiebreaker as we beat them head to head. I see us at #3 right now.
Posts: 2,006

10-10-2012, 02:25 PM	#58
Chief Roundup Admitted Planet Junky Join Date: Oct 2000 Casino cash: $2071627	I would rather this team have a 10-6 season and be willing to trade up in the draft to get a QB. But I think we all know that is not going to happen. So I hope we lose enough to be able to get one of the top guys. I know this won't be popular but if we end up with the 1st overall pick and could turn that pick into Wilson along with several other top picks, whatever combination of 1st and 2cd rounders, over the next couple of years I would have to trade the pick. __________________ Fanaticism is nowhere. There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
Posts: 19,198