****The Official NEW (new)^3 conference realignment & shit talk thread****

[Pitt Gorilla]

in memory of Saul Good. He will be missed.

[Prison Bitch]

Originally Posted by KChiefs1

I was done posting about the SEC NETWORK but I just realized how butt hurt you are over it so....enjoy!

So Mizzou is 9-8 in SEC play and has obv "proved" they can play with the big boys. Except, that's not true in the slightest no matter what their fans or boosters in local media delude themselves into thinking.


9 wins: Their opponents finished SEC play 22-51 (30%).
8 losses: their opponents finished SEC play 52-13 (80%).


In 17 games they have beaten one team with a winning record, Georgia at 5-3. If you strip out the MU games from the above data, it's still 34% & 77% respectively or no difference. Football powerhouse.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

So Mizzou is 9-8 in SEC play and has obv "proved" they can play with the big boys. Except, that's not true in the slightest no matter what their fans or boosters in local media delude themselves into thinking.


9 wins: Their opponents finished SEC play 22-51 (30%).
8 losses: their opponents finished SEC play 52-13 (80%).


In 17 games they have beaten one team with a winning record, Georgia at 5-3. If you strip out the MU games from the above data, it's still 34% & 77% respectively or no difference. Football powerhouse.

why do you care so much what Mizzou Fan thinks?

[WhawhaWhat]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

So Mizzou is 9-8 in SEC play and has obv "proved" they can play with the big boys. Except, that's not true in the slightest no matter what their fans or boosters in local media delude themselves into thinking.


9 wins: Their opponents finished SEC play 22-51 (30%).
8 losses: their opponents finished SEC play 52-13 (80%).


In 17 games they have beaten one team with a winning record, Georgia at 5-3. If you strip out the MU games from the above data, it's still 34% & 77% respectively or no difference. Football powerhouse.

Given this criteria, who are the powerhouses in college football? Those numbers are worthless without context compared to other teams.

Oklahoma beat 3 teams over the last 2 years that were over .500 in Big 12 play and those teams were all 5-4. The three teams they lost to were well above .500. Do you consider them a powerhouse?

[Bambi]

Didn't Michael Sam graduate?

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

So Mizzou is 9-8 in SEC play and has obv "proved" they can play with the big boys. Except, that's not true in the slightest no matter what their fans or boosters in local media delude themselves into thinking.


9 wins: Their opponents finished SEC play 22-51 (30%).
8 losses: their opponents finished SEC play 52-13 (80%).


In 17 games they have beaten one team with a winning record, Georgia at 5-3. If you strip out the MU games from the above data, it's still 34% & 77% respectively or no difference. Football powerhouse.

Beats 1 and 27 in a shit conference like your pilgrims.

[Prison Bitch]

Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat

Given this criteria, who are the powerhouses in college football? Those numbers are worthless without context compared to other teams.

Oklahoma beat 3 teams over the last 2 years that were over .500 in Big 12 play and those teams were all 5-4. The three teams they lost to were well above .500. Do you consider them a powerhouse?

Oklahoma is 9-8 in League last two seasons?

[Eleazar]

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball

Beats 1 and 27 in a shit conference like your pilgrims.

and the 1 is a team that was in a minor football conference before realignment and has a 33% winning percentage since joining the Big 12-2

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

Oklahoma is 9-8 in League last two seasons?

Well they are in a lesser conference. The SEC East which you dipshits call weak is a better league than the Big Bevo

[WhawhaWhat]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

Oklahoma is 9-8 in League last two seasons?

15-3 but they only beat 3 teams above .500 in Big 12 play, again all 5-4 teams. The win % of the teams for the 15 wins is on par with the win % of the Mizzou teams (34% to 30%).

[Bambi]

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball

Well they are in a lesser conference. The SEC East which you dipshits call weak is a better league than the Big Bevo

The Big 12 flagship buried the SEC West flagship. The SEC West Champ humiliated the SEC East Champ.

I think you've got things backwards there bud.

[Bambi]

lol, PB has once again roped them in to compare MU Football and KU Football.

And he doesn't even like Charlie.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

There is no comparison

[Bambi]

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball

There is no comparison

Sure there is; head to head (even), Hall of Fame (Kansas), Bowl Wins (Missouri), major bowl wins (Kansas)... Overall impact on college football (n/a)

[Pasta Little Brioni]

[kepp]

Originally Posted by Bambi

Sure there is; head to head (even), Hall of Fame (Kansas), Bowl Wins (Missouri), major bowl wins (Kansas)... Overall impact on college football (n/a)

1. Head to head is not even. Mizzou is ahead.
2. Who cares?
3. "Major bowl wins" means what? BCS? You do realize we've played in the Orange Bowl 4 times, right? ...and the Sugar Bowl twice?