|
|
05-05-2012, 01:01 PM | #1 |
trap champ
Join Date: Mar 2009
Casino cash: $10004900
|
I dont know why everyone hates on spiderman 3.
__________________
Orginator of the group repost |
Posts: 5,445
|
05-05-2012, 01:19 PM | #2 |
You gotta kill a few people
Join Date: Sep 2007
Casino cash: $1872369
|
Neither do I. I think it was just the fact that it was, at that point, one of the most hyped movies of the generation. When it finally came out, it was just an average superhero flick. People were expecting the best ever. Not to mention they did totally **** up Venom..
I own the film and still watch it from time to time. Spider-Man 2 was the best with Spider-Man 1 being just a notch below. I'd put the third one at a couple notches below those two. |
Posts: 44,420
|
05-05-2012, 11:19 PM | #3 | |
Shaken. Not stirred.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Casino cash: $13980126
VARSITY
|
Quote:
And that stupid ass dance scene. Sandman should have been the secondary villian with Venom as the primary. |
|
Posts: 65,557
|
05-05-2012, 01:24 PM | #4 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Casino cash: $8071398
|
Lots of reasons:
It felt thrown together. Director didn't have his heart in it. It went too far in extreme directions. Too many new characters. Terrible film representation of Venom. "Dark" Peter Parker Lack of substance. Too many Raimi family members w/ speaking roles. Melodrama. Lack of vision and consistency. Mediocre acting. Poor storytelling. Spider-Man 2 really raised the bar/hard to meet expectations. Those are just off the top of my head. |
Posts: 3,833
|
05-05-2012, 05:26 PM | #5 |
Go Beavers!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Warshington
Casino cash: $5518243
|
|
Posts: 14,501
|
05-05-2012, 05:35 PM | #6 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parkville MO
Casino cash: $10005170
|
|
Posts: 54,695
|
|
|