Matt Barkley doesn't resemble elite quarterback prospect in 2012

[KCFaninSEA]

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning

It's just stupid that people are coming up with reasons for us not to pick this guy.

It's time.

I think it is more of people wondering if we can get another stud at pick #1 and a different quality QB with just as much upside at pick #33. If there is no other quality QB then ya take him but if the falloff from him to a guy at #33 won't be that much then it must be evaluated.

Lets face it, it makes for great discussion and at this point there will be a ton of transition at arrowhead between now and then. Anything could happen.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by KCFaninSEA

I think it is more of people wondering if we can get another stud at pick #1 and a different quality QB with just as much upside at pick #33. If there is no other quality QB then ya take him but if the falloff from him to a guy at #33 won't be that much then it must be evaluated.

Lets face it, it makes for great discussion and at this point there will be a ton of transition at arrowhead between now and then. Anything could happen.

That thought process makes me sick to my stomach.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by BossChief

That thought process makes me sick to my stomach.

It's the same argument we've seen for years.

[The Bad Guy]

Originally Posted by KCFaninSEA

I think it is more of people wondering if we can get another stud at pick #1 and a different quality QB with just as much upside at pick #33. If there is no other quality QB then ya take him but if the falloff from him to a guy at #33 won't be that much then it must be evaluated.

Lets face it, it makes for great discussion and at this point there will be a ton of transition at arrowhead between now and then. Anything could happen.

Your head must be evaluated.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by KCFaninSEA

I think it is more of people wondering if we can get another stud at pick #1 and a different quality QB with just as much upside at pick #33. If there is no other quality QB then ya take him but if the falloff from him to a guy at #33 won't be that much then it must be evaluated.

Lets face it, it makes for great discussion and at this point there will be a ton of transition at arrowhead between now and then. Anything could happen.

You are a fan of a team that has NEVER owned their own home-grown franchise QB.

You're going to get a shot at one here this upcoming draft for the FIRST ****ING TIME IN YOUR SORRY ****ING LIFE.

And you want to ****ing GAMBLE THAT AWAY just so you can get a measly ****ing DEFENSIVE PLAYER in the package?

Unbe****inglievable.

QBs aren't about draft value, you ****ing moron. If you don't have one, and a guy is available, YOU TAKE THE ****ING QB AND GO **** YOUR SISTER SO YOU SHUT THE **** UP.

****

[whoman69]

We can all give the excuses, but if the Chiefs choose anything but QB in the first then the team should be immediately sold.

[KCFaninSEA]

Originally Posted by SNR

You are a fan of a team that has NEVER owned their own home-grown franchise QB.

You're going to get a shot at one here this upcoming draft for the FIRST ****ING TIME IN YOUR SORRY ****ING LIFE.

And you want to ****ing GAMBLE THAT AWAY just so you can get a measly ****ing DEFENSIVE PLAYER in the package?

Unbe****inglievable.

QBs aren't about draft value, you ****ing moron. If you don't have one, and a guy is available, YOU TAKE THE ****ING QB AND GO **** YOUR SISTER SO YOU SHUT THE **** UP.

****

I raise questions. That is it. I never said I didn't want anybody. I never said I wanted a certain player or position. I just raised questions. Why don't you learn to read and quit being so sensitive to a subject you obviously are very touchy about. If you would read what I have said, I stated they need a QB in a bad way. No doubt about it. But I also know this team sucks and needs talent in more areas than just at QB. Maybe if you spent some time watching some of the other losers on this team, other than the QB, you would realize this. QB is the most important position on the field, no question, my point is they need help all over the place and a good QB will only make this team average at best.

[the Talking Can]

Originally Posted by KCFaninSEA

I raise questions. That is it. I never said I didn't want anybody. I never said I wanted a certain player or position. I just raised questions. Why don't you learn to read and quit being so sensitive to a subject you obviously are very touchy about. If you would read what I have said, I stated they need a QB in a bad way. No doubt about it. But I also know this team sucks and needs talent in more areas than just at QB. Maybe if you spent some time watching some of the other losers on this team, other than the QB, you would realize this. QB is the most important position on the field, no question, my point is they need help all over the place and a good QB will only make this team average at best.

i can't believe people still show up spouting this crap

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by KCFaninSEA

I raise questions. That is it. I never said I didn't want anybody. I never said I wanted a certain player or position. I just raised questions. Why don't you learn to read and quit being so sensitive to a subject you obviously are very touchy about. If you would read what I have said, I stated they need a QB in a bad way. No doubt about it. But I also know this team sucks and needs talent in more areas than just at QB. Maybe if you spent some time watching some of the other losers on this team, other than the QB, you would realize this. QB is the most important position on the field, no question, my point is they need help all over the place and a good QB will only make this team average at best.

This isn't the last draft the NFL will ever see, cockgobbler. Get your precious help next year. Or, you know, hire a GM worth two shits who can find talent in the middle rounds. We've got a ton of picks. We could conceivably fill ALL our holes in just this one draft. It's not likely, but it's possible.

If not, then there's next year. And the year after that. But don't ****ing gamble away the best QB in the draft just so you can get a ****ing slapdick DE that you can draft ANY ****ING TIME.

"I raise questions"

How about you raise a question that has merit? Like whether you should drink sulfuric acid or not

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by KCFaninSEA

I raise questions. That is it. I never said I didn't want anybody. I never said I wanted a certain player or position. I just raised questions. Why don't you learn to read and quit being so sensitive to a subject you obviously are very touchy about. If you would read what I have said, I stated they need a QB in a bad way. No doubt about it. But I also know this team sucks and needs talent in more areas than just at QB. Maybe if you spent some time watching some of the other losers on this team, other than the QB, you would realize this. QB is the most important position on the field, no question, my point is they need help all over the place and a good QB will only make this team average at best.

Dude you are a member for a month now. See you what you don't know, you noob, is that you are just the latest person to come here saying this type of crap. When there are a lot of posters been saying we need a QB for years. We finally have a chance to get one now. You will not find the Aaron Rodgers falling type of thing with the new CBA. You get one at the top or you don't get one. All other positions can be filled any where else in the draft.

[Dave Lane]

Originally Posted by SNR

You are a fan of a team that has NEVER owned their own home-grown franchise QB.

You're going to get a shot at one here this upcoming draft for the FIRST ****ING TIME IN YOUR SORRY ****ING LIFE.

And you want to ****ing GAMBLE THAT AWAY just so you can get a measly ****ing DEFENSIVE PLAYER in the package?

Unbe****inglievable.

QBs aren't about draft value, you ****ing moron. If you don't have one, and a guy is available, YOU TAKE THE ****ING QB AND GO **** YOUR SISTER SO YOU SHUT THE **** UP.

****