It's official: Bruce Jenner is a chick

[Bufkin]

His changing look has been a much-buzzed-about topic for months, and now PEOPLE has confirmed that Bruce Jenner has been quietly making a very personal change. The former Olympian will soon be living life as female.

"Bruce is transitioning to a woman," says a source close to the family. "He is finally happy and his family is accepting of what he's doing. He's in such a great space. That's why it's the perfect time to do something like this."

And according to a different Jenner insider, the 65-year-old reality star is filming his momentous journey, to be shared with viewers on a docu-series this year. "It will air when he is ready to be open about his transition," the source tells PEOPLE. "But he's acting more and more confident and seems very happy."

Jenner's much-documented physical appearance (he's been photographed with longer hair, manicured nails and wearing makeup) has led to much speculation, but according to the insider, Jenner's decision to transition slowly was made in part so that his family would have time to adapt to the change.

"He's being very smart about and also respectful about his transition," the insider says. "Instead of completely shocking everyone, his changes have been subtle, and his family has had the chance to slowly get used to his new looks and life."

And his family, including children Cassandra, 34, Burt, 36 (with ex wife Chrystie Crownover ) and sons Brandon, 33 and Brody, 31 (with ex wife Linda Thompson), as well as daughters Kendall, 19 and Kylie, 17 (with Kris Jenner) are adjusting to the new Bruce. "The [kids'] concern seems to be Bruce's happiness, and he acts very pleased with his new life," says the insider.

Admits the family source: "It is an intense thing. Of course not everyone is 100 percent on board. Different people have different reactions. But everybody loves him."

When asked about Jenner on ET, his stepdaughter Kim Kardashian simply said, "I think everyone goes through things in life, and I think that story and what Bruce is going through, I think he'll share whenever the time is right." And when reached by PEOPLE, son Burt would only say his father is "doing awesome."

"The family is really giving this space and time to Bruce. This is his story and they want him to tell the world the way he wants," the source close to the family says. "They really want to empower him to tell his story so that hopefully he can help other people too. That's the goal."

Now it appears that Jenner, finally happy in his own skin, will soon be ready to live life out in the open. "He has come out to those closest to him," says the family source. "He's so happy and excited. He gets to lay down a huge bag of bricks. He's been through a dark period and is coming out on the other side."

Numerous requests for comment from Jenner and his representatives were met with no reply.

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

Jenner says he's not sure on the sex change part yet. That seems really odd to me: if you're really a woman and you're taking hormones and you're claiming to be a woman since childhood, why would you keep your pecker around?

Well, it's kind of fun to own one.

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by Easy 6

But you're assuming its a crime.

I know what the Bible says, and I also know that Jesus provided a New Covenant that softens so many of the OT passages... my bottom line is that God created most gays, they had no choice in it, from their very first thoughts and urges they were thinking of the same sex.

What seems criminal to me is blaming them for it.

you're free to see it as it is natural. your love isn't based on the whether it's natural...you just love your child. it doesn't validate your love

others do not see it as natural, their love isn't based on whether its unnatural... they just love their child. it doesn't invalidate their love.

equating acceptance as love is a slippery slope. where does the line get drawn?



let's go a positive route...your kid is musically gifted, but wants to sing a certain type of musc, but only can get a contract if he sings a different genre, he chooses to take the contract, his parents don't approve of the music, but still love their child.

.

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

The act of bringing it up as a comparison is a form of equation.

Also, since people are still erroneously comparing gender and sex, I'm going to quote my earlier post again:

gender classification nouns are static and also apllied to animals.

your uncle cant' be you aunt, just like a stallion can't be a mare.

advertising for babies is a different spectrum.

we associate many thing with color, that remain static.

[Katipan]

Plenty of people are given titles like Uncle, Brother, Sister, who didn't earn that badge through rite of birth.

Those words only mean what we want them to mean.

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by stevieray

you're free to see it as it is natural. your love isn't based on the whether it's natural...you just love your child. it doesn't validate your love

others do not see it as natural, their love isn't based on whether its unnatural... they just love their child. it doesn't invalidate their love.

equating acceptance as love is a slippery slope. where does the line get drawn?



let's go a positive route...your kid is musically gifted, but wants to sing a certain type of musc, but only can get a contract if he sings a different genre, he chooses to take the contract, his parents don't approve of the music, but still love their child.

.

For me the line is drawn at this... she was raised in a heterosexual home that was full of love, while we had our troubles as a young couple/parents it was a healthy home, she was baptized as a baby and again at church camp when she was older, she attended church (though maybe not as regularly as she should have thanks to her parents) and multiple church camps in her youth.

There were plenty of chances for the holy spirit to take control and change her spirit, but it didn't happen and she somehow turned out gay... I refuse to blame her for that, to me its just another one of Gods many mysteries.

Its my opinion that you and others across America are being far too literal in interpreting those Old Testament passages, God has given the world so, sooo many mysteries that he doesn't solve in the Bible.

To me, those mysteries are left to us to ponder and deal with in as loving a way as we can... God loves my daughter and other gays and only He knows the real story of how and why they happen.

Its all up to HIM, not us.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by stevieray

gender classification nouns are static and also apllied to animals.

your uncle cant' be you aunt, just like a stallion can't be a mare.

advertising for babies is a different spectrum.

we associate many thing with color, that remain static.

No one is arguing about Jenner's innate biology, only which gender she identifies with. Your equation of a stallion and a mare demonstrates an inability to understand the argument.

Again, we ascribe masculine and feminine behaviors (gender roles) to biological sexes, but those roles are culturally determined and not hard facts of nature. Males are capable of nurturing and females are capable of hunting and gathering, despite our association with the former as a feminine behavior and the latter as masculine.

[Cmd'r&Chief]

Originally Posted by aturnis

Why? Does she make you uncomfortable?

He

[Al Bundy]

The Iron Sheik ‏@the_ironsheik 23h23 hours ago
BRUCE JENNER YOU MAN OR YOU WOMAN YOU GOLD MEDAL BUBBA. GOD BLESS YOU AND **** THE HULK HOGAN

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by Bowser

famous for the sake of being famous. Never seen anything quite like it.

Duck Dynasty

[Mr. Laz]

Bruce Jenner aside

I really wish the world would ignore the entire flea-ridden family.

rewarding them for being conscienceless whores is beyond pathetic

you want to help whores then go downtown and pay double for a blowjob from a street walker

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by Easy 6

.

Its my opinion that you and others across America are being far too literal in interpreting those Old Testament passages,

you didn't address the points, but that's ok.

...it's also in the NT.

We are both free to choose whether it's literal or not. Just as i mentioned in an earlier post, we are free to choose whether we accept the behavior or not and neither invalidates /validates the love for our children.

[Prison Bitch]

Originally Posted by Katipan

That is ridiculous. An accidental castration doesn't make a man less of a man. Neither does a non accidental one.

Wrong. No pecker, no man. Kinda like no justice no peace

[Katipan]

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch

Wrong. No pecker, no man. Kinda like no justice no peace

Then by all means dominance should be decided by the biggest dick.

Sorry about your luck.

[Cmd'r&Chief]

I love how there are so many people using this thread to promote their "tolerance." Get the **** out of here. So this dude feels like a woman on the inside. Michael Jackson felt like he was white and got a bunch of crazy surgeries done too. Nobody gives a shit and nobody thinks you're tolerant for faking like you give a shit.

You know who else felt like a woman inside?

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by Katipan

That is ridiculous. An accidental castration doesn't make a man less of a man. Neither does a non accidental one.

Then what makes a man/woman?

DNA?
mindset?

I don't know


deep and complicated question

all beyond me, i just mind my own business and wish all good luck.