|
|
11-13-2012, 01:17 PM | #1 |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $4174563
|
I agree.
I think Barkley will be a fine QB. Everytime CP wants to rip Barkley, i think back to the year Ryan was drafted. A lot of people were against drafting him for the same reasons they are against drafting Barkley. Personally, I prefer Wilson, but i think Barkley is safer and Smith has the most talent.
__________________
Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever. |
Posts: 64,435
|
11-13-2012, 04:42 PM | #2 | |
Unsparing
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
Boo. Suck. |
|
Posts: 77,135
|
11-13-2012, 04:45 PM | #3 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Barkley may be "safer" because he's a proven four year starter at one of the nation's best universities.
No first round pick is immune to being a bad pick in the NFL but going with the "safe bet" at quarterback isn't necessarily a "bad" thing. Locker and Gabbert weren't safe bets and I wouldn't take either. It's pretty clear to me that Sarkissian, Locker's coach (and Leinart & Sanchez's coach) coached those guys up big time. Barkley has succeeded despite being coached by Kiffin. |
Posts: 88,960
|
11-13-2012, 04:48 PM | #4 | |
Unsparing
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiinteresting... |
|
Posts: 77,135
|
|
|