Chiefs Well, this doesn't make much sense.

Direckshun · 04-26-2013, 08:42 AM

Staying at 1.1 and drafting a tackle makes sense if we traded Albert.

Trading down from 1.1 and drafting BPA on value makes sense if we still have Albert.

Trading Albert away for a 2nd rounder makes sense if we had to give up our second this year for Alex Smith.

Trading a 2nd for Alex Smith makes sense if we didn't think we could land any good QBs with our 2nd rounder.

But none of these are the case. We still have Albert, we stayed at 1.1, we took a tackle, Geno Smith and Matt Barkley are still on the board, and we don't have a single second round pick.

Oh no, I've gone cross-eyed.

There are several strategies that would have made sense here, but the Chiefs have seemed to have skillfully navigated around all of them.

I... just don't get it.

Fritz88 · 04-26-2013, 08:44 AM

I am positive we'll trade BA to Miami tonight. It just makes too much sense not to happen.
Posted via Mobile Device

Amnorix · 04-26-2013, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88

I am positive we'll trade BA to Miami tonight. It just makes too much sense not to happen.
Posted via Mobile Device

Yeah, but Miami's leverage has gone up. Chiefs now have to trade Albert, unless they think either Albert or Fisher can/should be moved to RT and they have a need there.

I can only assume that the Chiefs are comfortable that they will get good value for Albert from someone, either today or post-draft.

Fritz88 · 04-26-2013, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix

Yeah, but Miami's leverage has gone up. Chiefs now have to trade Albert, unless they think either Albert or Fisher can/should be moved to RT and they have a need there.

I can only assume that the Chiefs are comfortable that they will get good value for Albert from someone, either today or post-draft.

How did their leverage go up?

All first round caliber tackles are gone. Unless they want to get a rookie second or third rounder, they can get top 10 Tackle in Albert.
Posted via Mobile Device

Amnorix · 04-26-2013, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88

How did their leverage go up?

All first round caliber tackles are gone. Unless they want to get a rookie second or third rounder, they can get top 10 Tackle in Albert.
Posted via Mobile Device

On the presumption the Chiefs have to move Albert. If the Chiefs don't have to move Albert, because either he or Fisher can be swung to the right, or there are more teams than the Dolphins interested in him, then the Chiefs' leverage has gone up instead.

Fritz88 · 04-26-2013, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix

On the presumption the Chiefs have to move Albert. If the Chiefs don't have to move Albert, because either he or Fisher can be swung to the right, or there are more teams than the Dolphins interested in him, then the Chiefs' leverage has gone up instead.

According to Reid, Fisher can pretty much play anywhere in the line.
Posted via Mobile Device

Messier · 04-26-2013, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix

On the presumption the Chiefs have to move Albert. If the Chiefs don't have to move Albert, because either he or Fisher can be swung to the right, or there are more teams than the Dolphins interested in him, then the Chiefs' leverage has gone up instead.

They don't have to move Albert.

ChiefaRoo · 04-26-2013, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix

Yeah, but Miami's leverage has gone up. Chiefs now have to trade Albert, unless they think either Albert or Fisher can/should be moved to RT and they have a need there.

I can only assume that the Chiefs are comfortable that they will get good value for Albert from someone, either today or post-draft.

Nope. Keep BA and play him at LT this year and Fisher at RT. Make Miami suck it for trading with the Raiders.

Fritz88 · 04-26-2013, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo

Nope. Keep BA and play him at LT this year and Fisher at RT. Make Miami suck it for trading with the Raiders.

I think Ireland has taken the bait and he isn't worried about it because he has enough picks.
Posted via Mobile Device

KChiefs1 · 04-26-2013, 08:49 AM

Albert's value went up after yesterday.

kcxiv · 04-26-2013, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1

Albert's value went up after yesterday.

how do you figure? Dolphins traded their early 2nd rounder! They have only a late 2nd now! Dolphins rear ended the Chiefs, they said **** you and your early 2nd, now we dont have that chip anymore take a high 2nd or go kick rocks. lol

**HemiEd** · 04-26-2013, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fruit Ninja

how do you figure? Dolphins traded their early 2nd rounder! They have only a late 2nd now! Dolphins rear ended the Chiefs, they said **** you and your early 2nd, now we dont have that chip anymore take a high 2nd or go kick rocks. lol

I don't want to see Albert traded, but the Dolphins aren't the only team needing a left tackle. Detroit and Chicago need one badly. Detroit lost both starting tackles from last year.

Sorter · 04-26-2013, 08:49 AM

at the Austin Powers reference.

L.A. Chieffan · 04-26-2013, 08:51 AM

we needed a rt, we drafted one that nobody ever seen play with the first pick.

what seems to be the problem?

**ptlyon** · 04-26-2013, 08:56 AM

Quit trying to mind **** it.

Just come to the realization that this regime is as shitty as the last one.

04-26-2013, 08:42 AM	Topic Starter
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4213447	Well, this doesn't make much sense. Staying at 1.1 and drafting a tackle makes sense if we traded Albert. Trading down from 1.1 and drafting BPA on value makes sense if we still have Albert. Trading Albert away for a 2nd rounder makes sense if we had to give up our second this year for Alex Smith. Trading a 2nd for Alex Smith makes sense if we didn't think we could land any good QBs with our 2nd rounder. But none of these are the case. We still have Albert, we stayed at 1.1, we took a tackle, Geno Smith and Matt Barkley are still on the board, and we don't have a single second round pick. Oh no, I've gone cross-eyed. There are several strategies that would have made sense here, but the Chiefs have seemed to have skillfully navigated around all of them. I... just don't get it.
Posts: 59,314

04-26-2013, 08:44 AM	#2
Fritz88 Custom User Title Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $8835943	I am positive we'll trade BA to Miami tonight. It just makes too much sense not to happen. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 12,706

04-26-2013, 08:49 AM	#10
KChiefs1 I’m a Mahomo! Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Mid-Missouri Casino cash: $6771021	Albert's value went up after yesterday. __________________
Posts: 54,038

04-26-2013, 08:49 AM	#13
Sorter Caralho Join Date: Sep 2011 Casino cash: $9631474	at the Austin Powers reference.
Posts: 18,453

04-26-2013, 08:51 AM	#14
L.A. Chieffan PLAY GOOD FOOTBALL Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: American Gardens Building Casino cash: $3978654	we needed a rt, we drafted one that nobody ever seen play with the first pick. what seems to be the problem?
Posts: 17,368

04-26-2013, 08:56 AM	#15
ptlyon Bono & Grbac wasn't enough Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Sioux City, IA Casino cash: $12893829	Quit trying to mind **** it. Just come to the realization that this regime is as shitty as the last one. __________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Advertise here: $19.99 a month
Posts: 33,820