Football Wait... doesn't the rule change concerning RBs.. - Page 2

Discuss Thrower · 04-02-2013, 08:28 AM

... effect the way defenses have to counter said rushers? If a back can't drop his shoulders for an extra yard, doesn't that, in theory mean that tacklers have an easier time bringing down guys once they cross the line of scrimmage?

And, if this is the case, then doesn't that negate the need for a "run stuffing" DT or ILB?

I could be -and probably am- wrong on this idea but at least it's a break from all of the Geno talk and forum drama.

DISCUS

patteeu · 04-02-2013, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gvtheogioD

Minh da vuot qua ngay 1/4 an toan de tan huong ngay 2/4 vui ve.
Chuc moi nguoi luon khoe va lam viec hieu qua
Than men

I agree with this.

04-02-2013, 08:28 AM
Discuss Thrower "You like to drink?" Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: "I like to drink." Casino cash: $3186869	Wait... doesn't the rule change concerning RBs.. ... effect the way defenses have to counter said rushers? If a back can't drop his shoulders for an extra yard, doesn't that, in theory mean that tacklers have an easier time bringing down guys once they cross the line of scrimmage? And, if this is the case, then doesn't that negate the need for a "run stuffing" DT or ILB? I could be -and probably am- wrong on this idea but at least it's a break from all of the Geno talk and forum drama. DISCUS
Posts: 42,733