We better draft this mother****er

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by O.city

There will be alot of turnover, but you don't have to sink high draft picks on every spot to get a good player.

Who said anything about "high" draft choice? What the ****?

The position NEEDS to be addressed. You don't trade a 3rd rounder for a receiver IF you have three receivers under contract. As a matter of fact, the Chiefs shouldn't trade for a receiver, period. Too many needs at other positions.

Originally Posted by O.city

Obviously, we have to lock up Bowe and Albert. But we are also going to have Jacksons money and Cassels money to use.

Whatever. It's all about the signing bonus, not the "cap hit".

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Who said anything about "high" draft choice? What the ****?

The position NEEDS to be addressed. You don't trade a 3rd rounder for a receiver IF you have three receivers under contract. As a matter of fact, the Chiefs shouldn't trade for a receiver, period. Too many needs at other positions.



Whatever. It's all about the signing bonus, not the "cap hit".

It does need addressed.

Curious your feelings on any free agent spending this offseason?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by O.city

Signing bonus?

The guaranteed money. Give a guy $30 million upfront spread it over 7 years and pay him $500k a year for the first few years. That's the way other teams constantly sign free agent talent.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

The guaranteed money. Give a guy $30 million upfront spread it over 7 years and pay him $500k a year for the first few years. That's the way other teams constantly sign free agent talent.

Got it, I edited cause I figured thats waht you were talking about.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by O.city

It does need addressed.

Curious your feelings on any free agent spending this offseason?

Dude, it's too early to assess anything.

The Senior Bowl and Combines will provide some information. The first few days of Free Agency will provide some direction.

But until the Chiefs name their offensive and defensive coordinators and begin to assess the roster, it's silly, IMO, to attempt to address anything with a hypothetical.

And JFC, I forgot: CB is a MUCH more important need than DE, even if the Chiefs lose Dorsey and Jackson. FTR, Dorsey can go. Jackson can come back at a reasonable salary. If not, **** 'em both.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Dude, it's too early to assess anything.

The Senior Bowl and Combines will provide some information. The first few days of Free Agency will provide some direction.

But until the Chiefs name their offensive and defensive coordinators and begin to assess the roster, it's silly, IMO, to attempt to address anything with a hypothetical.

And JFC, I forgot: CB is a MUCH more important need than DE, even if the Chiefs lose Dorsey and Jackson. FTR, Dorsey can go. Jackson can come back at a reasonable salary. If not, **** 'em both.

Gotcha.

Seems you are hoping we keep the 34?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by O.city

Gotcha.

Seems you are hoping we keep the 34?

Absolutely.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Absolutely.

I'm in the same boat.


I would really like to bring in Ray Horton as the DC if he gets outta Zona.

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Dude, it's too early to assess anything.

The Senior Bowl and Combines will provide some information. The first few days of Free Agency will provide some direction.

But until the Chiefs name their offensive and defensive coordinators and begin to assess the roster, it's silly, IMO, to attempt to address anything with a hypothetical.

And JFC, I forgot: CB is a MUCH more important need than DE, even if the Chiefs lose Dorsey and Jackson. FTR, Dorsey can go. Jackson can come back at a reasonable salary. If not, **** 'em both.

There is no way the need for 1 CB is more important than the need of 2 DE. This is a QB driven league. We need DLine to go along with our current pass rush to disrupt the opponents QB play.
The good defenses always have a better front 7 than the secondary.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

There is no way the need for 1 CB is more important than the need of 2 DE. This is a QB driven league. We need DLine to go along with our current pass rush to disrupt the opponents QB play.
The good defenses always have a better front 7 than the secondary.

So you believe this team needs a DE more than they need to get Arenas the **** off the field?

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by jd1020

So you believe this team needs a DE more than they need to get Arenas the **** off the field?

If we lose Jackson and Dorsey. Yes I do.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

If we lose Jackson and Dorsey. Yes I do.

Even if we lose them your belief is stupid.

UDFA's can do what Jackson and Dorsey have been doing.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

There is no way the need for 1 CB is more important than the need of 2 DE. This is a QB driven league. We need DLine to go along with our current pass rush to disrupt the opponents QB play.
The good defenses always have a better front 7 than the secondary.

You're smoking crack

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

You're smoking crack

Oh really. Do you think that the Ravens, Steelers, 49ers have a better secondary than they do in thier front 7?

If you do you are the one smokin crack.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

Oh really. Do you think that the Ravens, Steelers, 49ers have a better secondary than they do in thier front 7?

If you do you are the

I am the what?

You're a ****ing reerun.