|
|
View Poll Results: If no QB then who? | |||
LT Luke Joekel | 40 | 31.01% | |
DE Star Lotulelei | 30 | 23.26% | |
LB Jarvis Jones | 19 | 14.73% | |
Other (who, why?) | 40 | 31.01% | |
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-09-2013, 10:24 AM | #1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
This is the first time in the four decades I have been a Chiefs fan that we have the top pick. If we want to never have it again we should be very careful on this one. |
|
Posts: 26,959
|
02-09-2013, 10:38 AM | #2 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $2554064
|
Quote:
The 3 teams of the last 15 that didn't take a QB at 1, said player didn't even sign their second contract with that team. Anyway, to play this "game" I'll take Milliner I suppose. |
|
Posts: 81,401
|
02-09-2013, 10:39 AM | #3 |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
Yep. Franchise LT will help avoid this situation again.
|
Posts: 47,521
|
02-09-2013, 12:26 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
|
Posts: 26,959
|
02-09-2013, 12:29 PM | #5 | |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $2150208
|
Quote:
NOTHING is going to shoot us past 8-8 if it's not a real QB. You might disagree, but then I'd tell you that why draft one of those above positions when we can take the best QB and get a starter at one of those spots later in the draft? Either way we still get everything we need. Why does it have to be the QB that gets put on the wait list for later in the draft? Answer: It doesn't, and these hypotheticals are silly |
|
Posts: 90,628
|
|
|