Chiefs Chiefs looking to Trade down - Page 6

HotCarl · 02-26-2013, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy

And that makes zero sense. ***** had Brady and Dorsey had Rogers. You would think these two guys would value the QB position as being the top priority fod sure but neither of them seem to. Just throw anyone out there BS.

...or they judge that the underwhelming QB crop this year contains no Brady or RoDgers

Frankie · 02-26-2013, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy

And that makes zero sense. ***** had Brady and Dorsey had Rogers. You would think these two guys would value the QB position as being the top priority fod sure but neither of them seem to. Just throw anyone out there BS.

But both of them also got those elite QBs way under value. Their case is the exact opposite of the situation this year. You are arguing that Dorsey should get a QB OVER value.

htismaqe · 02-26-2013, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

But both of them also got those elite QBs way under value. Their case is the exact opposite of the situation this year. You are arguing that Dorsey should get a QB OVER value.

What value?

Is he worth the #1 pick? Why yes, yes he is.

Take him and shut up about it.

King_Chief_Fan · 02-26-2013, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTLB58

The Chiefs would love to trade down.

This is probably the worst year in a long time to have the #1 overall pick. The team will make the pick and just look around the room at each other and shrug their shoulders like eh? What else were we gonna do? And the LT will bust and be released just like Jake Long is gonna be after 4 years.

Here is my Opinion. Reid would take Geno if it were his call. Dorsey/Clark won't let him.

You really think that? Reid will get who ever he wants.

Frankie · 02-26-2013, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTLB58

The Chiefs would love to trade down.

This is probably the worst year in a long time to have the #1 overall pick.

Totally par for the course re Chiefs fortunes.

CoMoChief · 02-26-2013, 06:33 AM

told ya theyre looking to trade down

geno is not worth a 1st overall pick

Thig Lyfe · 02-26-2013, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

told ya theyre looking to trade down

geno is not worth a 1st overall pick

die

Sweet Daddy Hate · 02-26-2013, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thig Lyfe

die

**** no, friend. Let him play that goddamned fiddle from now until mid-April!
Posted via Mobile Device

KINGPIN CHIEFS FAN · 02-26-2013, 07:49 AM

I can't believe how many people believe everything they hear this time of year. It's 2 months until the draft takes place and people are going bonkers over every brokedick article that gets printed. Team personnel aren't going to tell us their draft plans even if they actually know what they're going to do themselves. Do you really think that Andy Reid spent 9 hours negotiating with Clark Hunt so he could play second fiddle to a rookie GM. Reid drafted McNabb and almost reached the pinnacle with him so it stands to reason that he will again choose a gifted quarterback to lead us to the promised land. Reid is driving this train and he doesn't want some mediocre castoff that he didn't draft and groom. Like Bill Parcells said "If I'm cooking the dinner then I want to shop for the ingredients". We're already light years ahead of where we were last year so sit back, relax, and enjoy the show!

Shox · 02-26-2013, 08:05 AM

Conflicting Positions:

1. Many say we must take Geno #1. He may not be RGIII, but we are in bad need of a QB and Geno has many of the tools you look for in a QB. So me must take Geno. I think it is a valid position.

2. Then many of the same people step and say there is no way we can find a trading partner. Well if argument #1 is true, then it seem Buffalo, Jags, Jets, and Cardinals would all be interested in moving up to get Geno. You also have Joekel, many teams would love to have a LT to plug in for the next decade.

If the Chiefs believe Geno is not the answer and get Smith or Foles, trading down is a real possiblity. It may have to be a little bit of discount compared to other years, but I don't see a situation where there is no trading partners.

Reerun_KC · 02-26-2013, 08:51 AM

If an irrelevant franchise could mess up the draft, it would be the Chiefs...

You dont become the Chiefs by doing the right thing.

You become the Chiefs by pushing for 9-7 and not screwing up the tailgating experience.

Trading the #1 pick tells you all you need to know about your failing franchise.

htismaqe · 02-26-2013, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

If an irrelevant franchise could mess up the draft, it would be the Chiefs...

You dont become the Chiefs by doing the right thing.

You become the Chiefs by pushing for 9-7 and not screwing up the tailgating experience.

Trading the #1 pick tells you all you need to know about your failing franchise.

RINGLEADER · 02-26-2013, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

If an irrelevant franchise could mess up the draft, it would be the Chiefs...

You dont become the Chiefs by doing the right thing.

You become the Chiefs by pushing for 9-7 and not screwing up the tailgating experience.

Trading the #1 pick tells you all you need to know about your failing franchise.

Well said.

If we let Albert walk for Joeckel or another LT it will be the clearest indication yet that this organization makes moves based first and foremost on money. That conclusion is, of course,rescinded if we address a meaningful need that makes the team better with the "Albert dollars," but I wouldn't count on it.

htismaqe · 02-26-2013, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER

Well said.

If we let Albert walk for Joeckel or another LT it will be the clearest indication yet that this organization makes moves based first and foremost on money. That conclusion is, of course,rescinded if we address a meaningful need that makes the team better with the "Albert dollars," but I wouldn't count on it.

There's only 1 glaring need on this team and it's perfectly addressed with the #1 pick.

Anything other than that is unacceptable.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 02-26-2013, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

There's only 1 glaring need on this team and it's perfectly addressed with the #1 pick.

Anything other than that is unacceptable.

This. Fiber-up, take off the depends, and do the ****ing deal.
Posted via Mobile Device

02-26-2013, 06:33 AM	#6
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $8042254	told ya theyre looking to trade down geno is not worth a 1st overall pick __________________
Posts: 39,163

02-26-2013, 07:49 AM	#9
KINGPIN CHIEFS FAN Starter Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $9905574	I can't believe how many people believe everything they hear this time of year. It's 2 months until the draft takes place and people are going bonkers over every brokedick article that gets printed. Team personnel aren't going to tell us their draft plans even if they actually know what they're going to do themselves. Do you really think that Andy Reid spent 9 hours negotiating with Clark Hunt so he could play second fiddle to a rookie GM. Reid drafted McNabb and almost reached the pinnacle with him so it stands to reason that he will again choose a gifted quarterback to lead us to the promised land. Reid is driving this train and he doesn't want some mediocre castoff that he didn't draft and groom. Like Bill Parcells said "If I'm cooking the dinner then I want to shop for the ingredients". We're already light years ahead of where we were last year so sit back, relax, and enjoy the show!
Posts: 863

02-26-2013, 08:05 AM	#10
Shox Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Casino cash: $10005765	Conflicting Positions: 1. Many say we must take Geno #1. He may not be RGIII, but we are in bad need of a QB and Geno has many of the tools you look for in a QB. So me must take Geno. I think it is a valid position. 2. Then many of the same people step and say there is no way we can find a trading partner. Well if argument #1 is true, then it seem Buffalo, Jags, Jets, and Cardinals would all be interested in moving up to get Geno. You also have Joekel, many teams would love to have a LT to plug in for the next decade. If the Chiefs believe Geno is not the answer and get Smith or Foles, trading down is a real possiblity. It may have to be a little bit of discount compared to other years, but I don't see a situation where there is no trading partners.
Posts: 718

02-26-2013, 08:51 AM	#11
Reerun_KC Rock Chalk Jayhawks! KU!!! Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $8301160	If an irrelevant franchise could mess up the draft, it would be the Chiefs... You dont become the Chiefs by doing the right thing. You become the Chiefs by pushing for 9-7 and not screwing up the tailgating experience. Trading the #1 pick tells you all you need to know about your failing franchise.
Posts: 934