Chiefs Prisco - Chiefs will go 6-10 - Page 9

Hammock Parties · 07-19-2012, 02:00 PM

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/1...as-city-chiefs

Kind of a weird article, with Clark Judge writing like a stupid homer, defending Cassel, calling McCluster a "dynamic and explosive playmaker."

Then it goes on to talk shit on Romeo Crennel at the end.

Most of it is tripe we already know, but there you have it. 6-10. Read it and weep.

Quesadilla Joe · 07-22-2012, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

The 2011 Denver Broncos said Hi

Denver didn't do things conventionally. The Chiefs are as conventional as it gets. Tebow was excellent at what he was asked to do.

Red Dawg · 07-22-2012, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus

We'll have a winning record this season and probably win the division.

I agree. We have all the pieces this season to win the division. OL is solid now and the D-line is soild. Running game should be back to top ten and our Wr's are a solid group. Defensively we have studs at key positions. Our questions are Charles, Berry and Tony returning back to form and of course our often up and down QB but is there any doubt we got better? We definitely got better.

We can take this divison. I am an not buying the Manning hype at all. 36, 4 neck surguries, did not played in 2011 and now he has a new team to get to know not to mention theie schedule looks pretty damn hard. I am afraid they will be very disappointed in Denver. SD did not improve that I can see and in fact I'd say they got weaker just like the Faiders.
Too many lost players.

**Easy 6** · 07-22-2012, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy

We can take this divison. I am an not buying the Manning hype at all. 36, 4 neck surguries, did not played in 2011 and now he has a new team to get to know not to mention their schedule looks pretty damn hard. I am afraid they will be very disappointed in Denver. SD did not improve that I can see and in fact I'd say they got weaker just like the Faiders.Too many lost players.

!

lcarus · 07-22-2012, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King

Generally the team with the worst QB in the division doesn't win the division.

Maybe so but I think the rest of the team is good enough to overcome poor-average QB play. Plus I'm not sold on the rest of the division. I believe the worst we'll do is split with the Raiders, Broncos, and Chargers.

**DaneMcCloud** · 07-22-2012, 11:20 PM

Cassel>Manning

What the hell bet did HE lose?

lcarus · 07-22-2012, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Cassel>Manning

What the hell bet did HE lose?

I already forgot. Probably something stupid like McGahee would rush for 2500 yards or some shit.

Micjones · 07-23-2012, 06:59 AM

Six wins would be the absolute floor for this team.

Hammock Parties · 07-23-2012, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

Six wins would be the absolute floor for this team.

UNPROVEN TALENT
SHITTY QB
SHITTY HC
SHITTY OC

SIX WINS, GUARANTEED

Dayze · 07-23-2012, 07:37 AM

I think 6-10 was around what I predicted. I think 8-8 is the ceiling.. first 6 games will basically tell us all we need to know about how the rest of the season will go / what the record will be like etc.

Chronic · 07-23-2012, 08:26 AM

Well the Chiefs sure do have a golden opportunity coming outta the gate to shock the world and prove everybody wrong

Falcons
Bills
Saints
Chargers
Ravens

Dayze · 07-23-2012, 09:15 AM

personally I htink the only game we win in the first 6 is against the Falcons.

FishingRod · 07-23-2012, 09:23 AM

The Chiefs are a fairly average team meaning 8-8 is about right but, a small handful of plays where the ball just bounces the right or wrong direction could easily make them 6-10 or 10-6. I would call the division a crapshoot and would not be shocked to see any of the teams come in first or last. Manning is the wildcard in the mix. If 85% as good as he once was Denver should win but, he is no spring chicken, has had neck surgery, and could easily be done for the season after a few weeks.

Messier · 07-23-2012, 09:38 AM

I'm sure in this thread it's been brought up, and maybe answered, but why are so many people here dead sure the Chiefs will finish one game worse than last year, assuming the heathy return of the injured players, plus the key additions? Is it all just hard schedule talk? If so, isn't it pretty much a given year in and year out that you can't predict which games are going to be hard and which games are easy? Last year before the season everyone was wringing their hands over the gauntlet of impossible games late in the season, and even with no running game, and Palko staring three of them we won two and almost another.

I don't see how this team is worse than last year, schedule aside. I think 7-9 has to be the starting point for the floor, just because I can't see any argument that this team is worse than last years team, heck, before the season and the injuries happened last year the en vogue thing to say was that the Chiefs might finish 8-8, 7-9.

O.city · 07-23-2012, 09:40 AM

Like it's been said in this thread, we played some pretty shitty qb's last year, that we likely won't play again this year.

The injuries coming back will make a difference, but so will not playing shitty qbs.

Messier · 07-23-2012, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Like it's been said in this thread, we played some pretty shitty qb's last year, that we likely won't play again this year.

The injuries coming back will make a difference, but so will not playing shitty qbs.

So our D can't make a good QB have a bad day?

As I see it we play five games against QBs that can win games by themselves, and I'm including Newton, but not Rivers, we've played him enough, and beaten him, that I don't think our D is in awe of him.

07-19-2012, 02:00 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4480478	Prisco - Chiefs will go 6-10 http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/1...as-city-chiefs Kind of a weird article, with Clark Judge writing like a stupid homer, defending Cassel, calling McCluster a "dynamic and explosive playmaker." Then it goes on to talk shit on Romeo Crennel at the end. Most of it is tripe we already know, but there you have it. 6-10. Read it and weep.
Posts: 278,546

07-22-2012, 11:20 PM	#125
DaneMcCloud Supporter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Hollywood, CA Casino cash: $10053648	Cassel>Manning What the hell bet did HE lose?
Posts: 88,960

07-23-2012, 06:59 AM	#127
Micjones Whose house? Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $10005180	Six wins would be the absolute floor for this team. __________________ It's like when I'm right I'm right, when I'm wrong I could been right, so I'm still right cause I coulda been wrong.
Posts: 15,344

07-23-2012, 07:37 AM	#129
Dayze Resident Glue Sniffer Join Date: Nov 2003 Casino cash: $4979358	I think 6-10 was around what I predicted. I think 8-8 is the ceiling.. first 6 games will basically tell us all we need to know about how the rest of the season will go / what the record will be like etc.
Posts: 37,374

07-23-2012, 08:26 AM	#130
Chronic Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Casino cash: $10005909	Well the Chiefs sure do have a golden opportunity coming outta the gate to shock the world and prove everybody wrong Falcons Bills Saints Chargers Ravens
Posts: 495

07-23-2012, 09:15 AM	#131
Dayze Resident Glue Sniffer Join Date: Nov 2003 Casino cash: $4979358	personally I htink the only game we win in the first 6 is against the Falcons.
Posts: 37,374

07-23-2012, 09:23 AM	#132
FishingRod Veteran Join Date: Mar 2006 Casino cash: $10016661	The Chiefs are a fairly average team meaning 8-8 is about right but, a small handful of plays where the ball just bounces the right or wrong direction could easily make them 6-10 or 10-6. I would call the division a crapshoot and would not be shocked to see any of the teams come in first or last. Manning is the wildcard in the mix. If 85% as good as he once was Denver should win but, he is no spring chicken, has had neck surgery, and could easily be done for the season after a few weeks.
Posts: 4,265

07-23-2012, 09:38 AM	#133
Messier MVP Join Date: Mar 2004 Casino cash: $10005050	I'm sure in this thread it's been brought up, and maybe answered, but why are so many people here dead sure the Chiefs will finish one game worse than last year, assuming the heathy return of the injured players, plus the key additions? Is it all just hard schedule talk? If so, isn't it pretty much a given year in and year out that you can't predict which games are going to be hard and which games are easy? Last year before the season everyone was wringing their hands over the gauntlet of impossible games late in the season, and even with no running game, and Palko staring three of them we won two and almost another. I don't see how this team is worse than last year, schedule aside. I think 7-9 has to be the starting point for the floor, just because I can't see any argument that this team is worse than last years team, heck, before the season and the injuries happened last year the en vogue thing to say was that the Chiefs might finish 8-8, 7-9.
Posts: 7,610

07-23-2012, 09:40 AM	#134
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $2534064	Like it's been said in this thread, we played some pretty shitty qb's last year, that we likely won't play again this year. The injuries coming back will make a difference, but so will not playing shitty qbs.
Posts: 81,418