It has gone beyond embarrassing

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Messier

No. I know we neeeeeeed a QB, but let's not take a late 1st, early 2nd round QB 3rd overall. If the first two QBs are gone, either take the next best one in the 2nd, or, sadly, we wait another year for the QBOF.

With the current CBA, a team should use their first pick on a QB every year until they find one.

[Baby Lee]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

With the current CBA, a team should use their first pick on a QB every year until they find one.

I think that's slight overstatement, particularly if you're a top five picker and 2 QBs are already gone.

Draft every QB you are fairly convinced has the goods and is at least on the block of BPA? Sure.

Draft a QB because even blind squirrels can find nuts. Not so much, particularly if clearly superior is still available.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

With the current CBA, a team should use their first pick on a QB every year until they find one.

You can't do that if you just got done picking a QB, though. You have to use that pick to support him.

[Rausch]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

With the current CBA, a team should use their first pick on a QB every year until they find one.

Complete agreement.

With rule changes and the new CBA it doesn't matter if you have 11 probowlers if none of them are at QB...