Chiefs Who were the clowns that claimed RGIII isn't that good?

Imon Yourside · 10-14-2012, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Seriously, I know there were a handful or so geniuses on here that didn't care for Robert's game.

I might trade our entire draft for the guy.

Out of curiosity where did you stand last year on him? I was kind of indifferent and would have happily taken him but really wanted Luck. I still think Luck will be the better QB when all is said and done, but would love to have RG III. Let's be realistic though, there was no chance Pioli was taking either of them.

Pitt Gorilla · 10-14-2012, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Out of curiosity where did you stand last year on him? I was kind of indifferent and would have happily taken him but really wanted Luck. I still think Luck will be the better QB when all is said and done, but would love to have RG III. Let's be realistic though, there was no chance Pioli was taking either of them.

I wanted to lose to draft him. I was unhappy when we beat Green Bay. I don't think I appreciated him prior to last season, but he was easily at the top of my board last season.

I did NOT want Tannehill, which may be a mistake in retrospect.

**notorious** · 10-14-2012, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I did NOT want Tannehill, which may be a mistake in retrospect.

I think you will be proven correct in time.

In a related story, who is Miami's coach this year?

What QB did that coach develop over the last several years?

Was said coach a candidate for HC here, and if so was he not hired because he wanted to bring in a new QB?

Intradasting.

tredadda · 10-15-2012, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Out of curiosity where did you stand last year on him? I was kind of indifferent and would have happily taken him but really wanted Luck. I still think Luck will be the better QB when all is said and done, but would love to have RG III. Let's be realistic though, there was no chance Pioli was taking either of them.

I think this could end up like the QB class of 83 in the sense that Luck might end up being the best QB of this class (Elway or Marino), but RGIII will still be a phenomenal talent (Kelly, Marino, or Elway whomever is viewed as the second best from that class.)

Denver Mike · 10-15-2012, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

I think this could end up like the QB class of 83 in the sense that Luck might end up being the best QB of this class (Elway or Marino), but RGIII will still be a phenomenal talent (Kelly, Marino, or Elway whomever is viewed as the second best from that class.)

I'd be willing to throw Wilson in with that group..

Sorry but Tannehill is garbage. We'll all see very soon if not already.

Luck, Griffin and Wilson will all 3 be elite starting caliber in the next 2-3 years. Instant contenders.

tredadda · 10-15-2012, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denver Mike

I'd be willing to throw Wilson in with that group..

Sorry but Tannehill is garbage. We'll all see very soon if not already.

Luck, Griffin and Wilson will all 3 be elite starting caliber in the next 2-3 years. Instant contenders.

I could see that honestly. The only true knock on Wilson coming out was his size. Many thought he would be a 1st rounder if not a Top 5 pick had he been like 6' 3".

Denver Mike · 10-15-2012, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

I could see that honestly. The only true knock on Wilson coming out was his size. Many thought he would be a 1st rounder if not a Top 5 pick had he been like 6' 3".

Yeah to be honest I'd take any of the 3 over Cam Newton..

Brees was a lil guy too.