Let's be real....our Defense....

[Woodchuck]

Originally Posted by milkman

What the **** is really wrong with you?

Did you miss the reports that told us that Crennel spent the majority of his time with the offense this week?

When you shit, have you learned to use paper to wipe, or do you still use your hands?

Yes, I heard them. They had 10 days to prepare. It was RACs gameplan imo and he owned him. Do you think he spent every minute of 10 days in the offensive room or some shit? Why is this such a crazy idea?

Romeo has owned everyone at one point or another as a DC. Why in the hell would he not gameplan for his former coach?

That gameplan had RAC written all over it.

Ever seen him gameplan for Gates the way we did Miller? Did we ever slow down Gates before RAC?

You guys are blinded by hate.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

You guys are blinded by hate.

You're blinded by enormous stupidity and a pea-sized brain

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

You're blinded by enormous stupidity and a pea-sized brain

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

Yes, I heard them. They had 10 days to prepare. It was RACs gameplan imo and he owned him.

You, of course, never even considered the fact that Gary Gibbs was here for Todd Haley's entire tenure and knows him just as well, if not better, than Romeo.

I don't give a rat's ass if Romeo only spent half his time with the offense, though from reports it appears to have been substantially more than that, he doesn't have the time to do more than give input into the defensive scheme for the game.

I have seriously tried to discuss things with you rationally, but good god, you are just beyond any ****ing hope.

Single celled amoeba's have more functional brain power.

[Woodchuck]

Originally Posted by milkman

You, of course, never even considered the fact that Gary Gibbs was here for Todd Haley's entire tenure and knows him just as well, if not better, than Romeo.

I don't give a rat's ass if Romeo only spent half his time with the offense, though from reports it appears to have been substantially more than that, he doesn't have the time to do more than give input into the defensive scheme for the game.

I have seriously tried to discuss things with you rationally, but good god, you are just beyond any ****ing hope.

Single celled amoeba's have more functional brain power.

I considered it and remembered how Gibbs was under Clancy Pendergast and probably needed help game planning. Clancy was pretty ****ing stupid.

Think about what you are saying. Do you really think RAC didn't participate in the game planning on the defensive side of the ball?

That idea is more rational than thinking he didn't. Oh well, I'm going to drop it.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

I considered it and remembered how Gibbs was under Clancy Pendergast and probably needed help game planning. Clancy was pretty ****ing stupid.

Think about what you are saying. Do you really think RAC didn't participate in the game planning on the defensive side of the ball?

That idea is more rational than thinking he didn't. Oh well, I'm going to drop it.

Two reasons, beyond time, that I believe Gary Gibbs had more to do with this gameplan.

First, I don't recall usage of the 2-4-6 subpakage at all.

Second, there were (it appeared) a number of zone-man cover pakages, something that Gibbs really utilized extensively while the DC in New Orleans.

[Woodchuck]

Originally Posted by milkman

Two reasons, beyond time, that I believe Gary Gibbs had more to do with this gameplan.

First, I don't recall usage of the 2-4-6 subpakage at all.

Second, there were (it appeared) a number of zone-man cover pakages, something that Gibbs really utilized extensively while the DC in New Orleans.

We used it alot dude. Elam played like a whole quarter straight. Watch the tape.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-h...ers-highlights

Don't you remember Gruden asking why Haley didn't want to make Tamba and Houston play LBer?

It was more 3-4 than the rest of the games for sure but, we were in the 2-4-6 half the time.

Romeo uses zone alot. Traditionally, he has used zone coverage more than man. I'm not sure where you are coming from there. He had the most success with really good zone corners.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

We used it alot dude. Elam played like a whole quarter straight. Watch the tape.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-h...ers-highlights

Don't you remember Gruden asking why Haley didn't want to make Tamba and Houston play LBer?

It was more 3-4 than the rest of the games for sure but, we were in the 2-4-6 half the time.

Romeo uses zone alot. Traditionally, he has used zone coverage more than man. I'm not sure where you are coming from there. He had the most success with really good zone corners.

You want to know how I know you don't have a ****ing clue?

In the post you quoted, I notice that I committed a typo.

Can you spot it?

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by milkman

You want to know how I know you don't have a ****ing clue?

In the post you quoted, I notice that I committed a typo.

Can you spot it?

, no he can't. He's a dumbass.

[Woodchuck]

Originally Posted by milkman

You want to know how I know you don't have a ****ing clue?

In the post you quoted, I notice that I committed a typo.

Can you spot it?

subpackage - that spelling BS is for assholes imo.

I just don't give a **** about spelling. Now Sorter, get back to work. You missed one there.

Sorter can find alot of mispelled words.

[Woodchuck]

Originally Posted by milkman

Two reasons, beyond time, that I believe Gary Gibbs had more to do with this gameplan.

First, I don't recall usage of the 2-4-6 subpakage at all.

Second, there were (it appeared) a number of zone-man cover pakages, something that Gibbs really utilized extensively while the DC in New Orleans.

I corrected it or made it better than that anyway


The sad thing is that this is all you got. You have resorted to correcting my spelling because you didn't pay attention to the formations we lined up in and you spouted your mouth off.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

I corrected it or made it better than that anyway


The sad thing is that this is all you got. You have resorted to correcting my spelling because you didn't pay attention to the formations we lined up in and you spouted your mouth off.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

I corrected it or made it better than that anyway


The sad thing is that this is all you got. You have resorted to correcting my spelling because you didn't pay attention to the formations we lined up in and you spouted your mouth off.

Furthering the proof that you don't have a ****ing clue.

I already told you it wasn't a spelling typo.